You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

flannel jesus

Comments

Once you have a fully featured model of what it means to make sense in any world, I think you'd find it means the same thing if we're deterministic or...
July 25, 2024 at 13:08
That doesn't make a lot of sense to me. If it makes sense to you though, keep on keeping on.
July 25, 2024 at 12:57
Intended by whom?
July 25, 2024 at 11:00
I think you've missed the context again
July 25, 2024 at 10:45
But the context is that we do have a consciousness literally telling determinists what to do, here in the thread. So comparing THAT - a real thinking ...
July 25, 2024 at 10:32
We all do, I appreciate the acknowledgement.
July 25, 2024 at 09:51
But that's not what he said. He said he's observed that they do fret, he didn't say he's observed that they're less likely to fret. If anything, he's ...
July 25, 2024 at 09:22
No need to be generous, just Google what it means to fret about something. First result is "to be constantly or visible anxious" for me. Anxiety is an...
July 25, 2024 at 08:58
I think they aren't all zen monks. Some are - in fact Zen Buddhists generally believe in determinism - but clearly not all determinists are zen monks
July 25, 2024 at 08:33
The entire context of this conversation is one person suggesting determinists not fret about decisions - that is the same as saying "determinists shou...
July 25, 2024 at 08:32
It hasn't been made to fit yet. I still don't see any sensible lines to draw between determinists and non determinists in regards to fretting. Either ...
July 25, 2024 at 08:12
I answered that, but I'll try to answer it more clearly: Either a) fretting about decisions frequently produces better decisions than not fretting, in...
July 25, 2024 at 07:07
No idea what this means
July 25, 2024 at 06:45
Not in the way that this person was telling determinists what to think. If someone wants to make an argument that it "tells" us things, they should di...
July 25, 2024 at 06:44
You can prove it pretty succinctly .9999... = x 9.9999... = 10x 10x-x = 9.999... - .999... 9x = 9 x = 1
July 24, 2024 at 16:30
the part here, now, where i am. I'm not some addition that someone decided to add in, that wasn't previously there. Everything that is "me" has always...
July 24, 2024 at 16:28
I'm not adding to it, i'm part of it, I'm a piece of it. It defines me, I am defined as a part of it. If your choice is not part of the causal chain, ...
July 24, 2024 at 16:14
Without? No, of course not. We're part of the causal chain, not merely victims of it.
July 24, 2024 at 15:48
I prefer to have my beliefs caused by rational thought and evidence, not beliefs without causes.
July 24, 2024 at 15:26
Do you really have a solid reason to believe this? What is it? Why did you step out of the casual chain? Did something... cause that?
July 24, 2024 at 15:10
This conversation seems predicated on causality to me - if it were free of the casual chain, we would just be writing random stuff. You're writing to ...
July 24, 2024 at 14:47
I think you lost sight of the train of conversation
July 24, 2024 at 14:14
What is this a reply to?
July 24, 2024 at 07:23
You've observed determinists doing... what exactly? "They fret about making "wrong" decisions" - yes, this isn't the part I'm arguing with. It's the p...
July 24, 2024 at 07:11
Yes but determinism isn't telling us "don't think" if we're already thinking - determinisms the one telling us think! Or rather, "we" are defined by d...
July 24, 2024 at 07:11
But if determinism is true, the obvious answer is "because I'm not determined to".
July 24, 2024 at 07:10
So what I've noticed is a bunch of non-determinists saying that determinists do, or should, think this way (even though it's not beneficial to think t...
July 23, 2024 at 20:41
Are you a determinist?
July 23, 2024 at 16:43
yet they don't what? yes, that's certainly part of the process.
July 23, 2024 at 06:31
let me rephrase: it doesn't match MY intuition, and many other people. To many of us, (2+2=4) implies (Kamala Harris is a presidential nominee) makes ...
July 22, 2024 at 09:53
I'd push back against this - this is one of the most egregious examples of logic disagreeing with our intuitive use of implication. In classic symboli...
July 22, 2024 at 09:42
But if you know that determinists do deliberate, despite being determinists, then you know that that's not an example of determinism leading to imprud...
July 22, 2024 at 08:06
You didn't ... make an op in which you talk about determinists and what they think and what their ideas are? Come on dude. Your op talks about determi...
July 22, 2024 at 07:42
You made an op in which you talk about determinists and what they think and what their ideas are, and the consequences of their ideas - whether you li...
July 22, 2024 at 07:35
Let me put it this way: There's these apparently competing ideas of how the world works. One idea is, we are "agents", and agents have minds and make ...
July 22, 2024 at 07:23
Just because some person wrote that there's a difference in some OP doesn't make it so
July 22, 2024 at 07:14
the alternative is that there isn't a real difference between those things. Between a series of specific brain states, compared to pondering and weigh...
July 22, 2024 at 06:55
Because I wanted to talk about the question of their contradictoriness without the baggage of the riddle. I think most people got the correct answer, ...
July 21, 2024 at 20:17
why? He's acting exactly as he's determined to. What's the line of reasoning that ends with "therefore I shouldn't deliberate?"
July 21, 2024 at 15:13
yes, he keeps talking like you can just skip straight to the end, but... that's not how determinism works in principle. You can't just cut out deliber...
July 21, 2024 at 14:57
you talk about it as if they could choose not to
July 21, 2024 at 14:55
The way I've stated it is relevant to this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barbershop_paradox The way I stated it was no more or less vague than it nee...
July 21, 2024 at 09:03
I think it should be worded as "Elvis is a man DOES imply that elvis is NOT simultaneously immortal and mortal". It positively implies something, rath...
July 19, 2024 at 13:29
Is that the right English translation of that? Keep in mind that ¬(B and ¬B) is equivalent to B or ¬B - would you say A ? (B or ¬B) can be worded as "...
July 19, 2024 at 13:22
Depending on circumstances, it might make more sense to say something like "A can't be proven to imply a contradiction" rather than "A doesn't imply a...
July 19, 2024 at 13:16
This might seem crazy to you, but I would translate that as just A, or in other words, A is true. If you are stating, for a fact, in classical logic, ...
July 19, 2024 at 13:12
https://www.umsu.de/trees/#~3a~5(a~5~3(b~1~3b)) https://www.umsu.de/trees/#~3a~5(a~5(b~1~3b)) I would reword it from "a does not imply a contradiction...
July 19, 2024 at 12:41
What's the general beliefs here regarding Trump's culpability for the infamous events of January 6? The two main takes are: he incited what happened h...
July 19, 2024 at 11:49
One way of approaching the problem might be thinking about the fact that wars are fought - some wars - ostensibly over freedom. Which means that a hug...
July 19, 2024 at 09:19
Which one of the above phrases are you saying is the english translation of (a?¬(b?¬b))? It's either «A implies a contradiction» is false or «A does n...
July 19, 2024 at 04:32