You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

flannel jesus

Comments

You don't even have a tentative definition of indeterminism?
March 11, 2025 at 19:14
the entire scenario with the 2 bobs is laid out assuming INDETERMINISM is the case. Not determinism. So that's why I didn't really understand why you'...
March 11, 2025 at 18:46
would you briefly paraphrase what you think the argument is in that article, and what the conclusion is? I'm really curious where you're at.
March 11, 2025 at 18:39
the article isn't about determinism
March 11, 2025 at 18:33
They HAVE TO perform the same action? I'm not sure we're reading the same article. Why do you say they have to? The author didn't say that.
March 11, 2025 at 18:30
My description of an indeterminist compatibilist didn't involve an indeterminist concept of free will.
March 11, 2025 at 18:19
every single word there has a clear prior context of meaning in this conversation, so I don't know why you think it's a jumble of words with no defini...
March 11, 2025 at 17:56
uh huh. And I stand by that. An indeterminist compatibilist is an indeterminist whose concept of free will is compatible with determinism.
March 11, 2025 at 17:52
Because that's what compatibilism means. Compatibilism in this context literally means, my concept of free will is compatible with determinism.
March 11, 2025 at 17:48
someone who believes in libertarian free will believes the following 3 things 1. We have free will 2. Indeterminism is true 3. Indeterminism MUST be t...
March 11, 2025 at 17:38
it can only be, yes, but that doesn't mean they mean the same thing. A square can only be a rectangle, but you can't just call things "squares" whenev...
March 11, 2025 at 17:18
I thought you were arguing for libertarian compatibilism.
March 11, 2025 at 17:10
did you know you don't have to be a determinist to be a compatibilist?
March 11, 2025 at 17:07
I think you've given the definition of determinism and called it "compatibilism".
March 11, 2025 at 17:01
Are those your definitions?
March 11, 2025 at 16:58
Other than the definition of what they are, which I wouldn't call "nothing". Now that you know what distinguishes determinism from indeterminism, do y...
March 11, 2025 at 16:19
What do you mean by "this"? What tells us nothing?
March 11, 2025 at 16:02
What does it mean more generally? For me, "free will" alone, without the term "libertarian" attached, is the general term. Attach "libertarian" and yo...
March 11, 2025 at 04:01
That's just the actual distinction between a deterministic system and an indeterministic one. In a deterministic system, the future states follow from...
March 11, 2025 at 03:54
this conservation started with you saying and you used yourself and your beliefs regarding teleological causation as an example, going as far as to ca...
March 10, 2025 at 23:04
an extremely unnecessarily narrow view of determinism fails, perhaps.
March 10, 2025 at 22:54
I think you're interpreting those words as narrowly as you can, so as to exclude the types of causes you're interested in. I don't interpret them so n...
March 10, 2025 at 22:45
I don't see why you think that quote excludes those types of causation. It certainly doesn't look like those types of causation are explicitly exclude...
March 10, 2025 at 22:25
I don't see why you think they're excluding goal-based determining factors. There's nothing, not one iota as far as I can see, of these definitions of...
March 10, 2025 at 21:57
That's much too opaque for me, sorry. I try to read between those lines, but I don't see anything. Can you spell out for me what you're trying to get ...
March 10, 2025 at 21:33
So wikipedia got it wrong you think, interesting. And I see people across the internet getting it wrong the same way (perhaps they're all just bouncin...
March 10, 2025 at 21:30
I succinctly said what determinism is? Can you copy and paste the thing I said that you think is the succinct definition of determinism? If you do tha...
March 10, 2025 at 21:27
Oh, I've never heard someone take that position. Wikipedia says Why do you think libertarianism isn't a subcategory of incompatibilism?
March 10, 2025 at 20:54
I believe in free will my dude I'm not sure what you mean by "do likewise for indeterminism"
March 10, 2025 at 20:09
He does? I missed this. I don't think he said incompatibilism at all in his article. Libertarianism is a subcategory of incompatibilism, and that's wh...
March 10, 2025 at 16:49
sure. When he's talking about world 1 and world 2, Bob 1 and Bob 2, that only makes sense in an indeterminist context. In a determinist context, Bob 1...
March 10, 2025 at 16:44
That's not two separate things. The machinery --is you--. Or at least a physical instantiation of the abstraction of "you" maybe. But probably simpler...
March 10, 2025 at 15:53
The conversation is about indeterminism. So the answer is, you don't. I think you've possibly misunderstood what's happening here.
March 10, 2025 at 15:40
I am a decision making machine. I'm free, perhaps in a trivial way, to do (or try to do) the things I want to. The things I, as a decision making mach...
March 10, 2025 at 14:19
?randomness? If you account for all facts between world one and world two, and all relevant facts about both worlds are precisely the same, then the d...
March 10, 2025 at 14:18
I don't think it's strictly logically impossible that Bob2 would do something different. I just think it makes no sense to attribute that difference t...
March 10, 2025 at 13:38
because your will is the same. How can you attribute a difference to something that was the same? Let's say one little kid grows up to be a great athl...
March 10, 2025 at 12:50
physics has come a long way since newton. Banno is most probably thinking about QM when he says that.
March 10, 2025 at 11:34
I conceive of compatibilism as quite general, not any specific way of framing the process of choice making. Compatibilism is a classification of a set...
March 10, 2025 at 09:51
I think we just have a difference in vocabulary, because my beliefs are really similar to yours, but I just call it compatibilism.
March 10, 2025 at 09:03
Wait, it could be predicted with perfect accuracy, but it isn't necessary? Are you sure this isn't a distinction without a difference? If something ha...
March 10, 2025 at 08:05
It sounds like you think, given the same state, the same future will follow. And it sounds like you believe we have free will anyway. I guess, to me, ...
March 10, 2025 at 07:32
what makes your view libertarian, instead of compatibilist?
March 10, 2025 at 07:01
In my view, yeah, that's really the alternative to determinism. If we have a system evolving over time, it seems to me that any given change in that e...
March 10, 2025 at 06:20
That's not what the article in the op is about
March 10, 2025 at 06:18
you really don't think I've captured just about everything you've said, much more succinctly and clearly, in my plain language paraphrasings? Dang dud...
March 10, 2025 at 00:02
mate, I can't do these crazy sentences. It seems like you're going out of your way to make the most basic concepts sound as complex as possible. You'v...
March 09, 2025 at 23:42
Honestly it just sounds like you can skip all the jargon and say, You've imagined a statue that you want to make. It becomes your goal to make it. You...
March 09, 2025 at 23:36