Neutrality clause was implemented when NATO (i.e. Germany and France) have shelved Ukraine's aspirations to indetermined future in place of the schedu...
Yes, it is truly incredible that your reading comprehension is so low. But it does explain some of your views. I have specifically written that AT THE...
It should be noted that at the time of annexation of Crimea Ukraine had neutrality clause in its constitution, and the reason given was that the new g...
I think the scenario of Belarusinization was much more likely - subjugation without formal annexation. It is simply more convenient this way. But for ...
The point is that even considering differences, Russia was not going to occupy the whole Afghanistan with 70 thousand troops or America was not going ...
Do you know how many Soviet troops have initially attacked Afghanistan? Or how many American troops have invaded Panama? By the way, you have not answ...
Yes, it is easy for anyone to check what was actually said and in what context. That it flies over your head is not exactly my problem, I have tried. ...
Yes, that is about it, the only thing that might not be clear from the first paragraph is the sequence: Putin became the prime minister, he has risen ...
No, I have provided five references. Not to mention the bigger context that has just flown over your head. So let me sum this up for you, in a way tha...
No, I have four other that say exactly the same thing. 'Russia has no concerns about the expansion of NATO from the standpoint of ensuring security, b...
I have provided five quotations of Putin that basically say that Ukraine is free to do as it pleases, all in context of NATO expansion or cooperation,...
Not so much yet, rather to stave off dissent. Note that whoever lately dared to criticize Putin directly (like the late Prigozhin or now imprisoned Gi...
Well, a full-scale war is not something you can do overnight. The plans must have started a few years back. Besides with the smoldering conflict in Do...
I have provided four such quotes, including two from the Kremlin presidential site itself. here is the fifth one: Lol, no, I supplement the historical...
Again, you are confused. Ukraine has trained troops with the US support and asked for weapons AFTER the conflict with Russia has already started and s...
No, it plays a major role, but not in every single event. Sometimes it plays an important, but not decisive role. Contrary to beliefs of some American...
Ignorance of the underlying conflict, its roots and progress. The internal divisions in Ukraine do not change the fact that the majority no longer wan...
Amusingly, on Russian TV Rita and others have stated grave warnings about foreign interference in Russian presidential elections, to which Michael Boh...
I am sure it does, given that I have proven your ignorance again and again. I have clearly written 'independence from Russia'. And that is exactly wha...
Yes, it shows how ridiculous your claims are. NATO, a strictly defensive alliance, with steadily decreasing army in Europe, is a grave threat, while R...
Again, my point, which I have repeated over and over, is that the shelling was insignificant. I admit I did not find the two cases you have quoted, bu...
But I did not assert anything of that kind. I have claimed that Russian shelling had a negilgible effect. Given that you were able to produce evidence...
By the way, it should be constantly repeated that this figure has been made up by Tzeentch and is a result of his complete misunderstanding the Russia...
And we have evidence that they have shelled ONE FACTORY. Given that your initial argument was LITERAL QUOTE: 'shelling targets of military value for 2...
I was pointing out that the article specifically described missile attacks as 'shelling'. Yes, that is one target of shelling which we have already me...
No, the Wikipedia does not say the 'siege' lasted in that period, in fact it did not use that term at all (only you and the sensationalist press insis...
I am perfectly aware of what you were arguing for. You have claimed that the nothern campaign was successful two-month siege of Kiyv that was supposed...
The thing is that nobody denies that Russians got a lot of territory and put Ukrainians in difficult situation. Yes, the southern campaign was much mo...
So it was not 'two-month shelling of military targets' and 'Russia sieges Kiev until Mariupol is fully taken', just two of your claims that were paten...
It is reported that about 150 people died in the 'shelling' of Kiyv in that period. It is hard to estimate, but it seems most of those were victims of...
'Shelling targets of military value for 2 months'? I suppose you mean shelling of residential suburbs from March 4 (when the main convoy got close eno...
It needs to be pointed out that the whole theory of 'just threatening Kiyv' with an army that was supposedly obviously and clearly incapable of threat...
You are wasting your time. He simply repeats the same claim which I have already shown to be false. In short, he does not understand the structure of ...
Some interesting posts from Murz (you can google translate them): https://t.me/wehearfromyanina/2860 https://t.me/wehearfromyanina/2861 https://t.me/w...
Well, there is this delicate problem that nobody in Russia knows what exactly they have annexed. On the anniversary of the 'referendum' different medi...
So the answer is: a) it is obvious b) actually, it does not Your backtracking is definitely getting better! Because, as it has become the norm in our ...
The actual arguments were right after that. Maybe you should read the whole paragraphs instead of just the first sentences, that would make our discus...
No, it was not the same position. Your claim was that it was always a 'red line', which is not true, as I have shown multiple times now. No, it is not...
No, I have quoted them as the explanation of what happened in Bucharest. Due to Russian protests, Germany and France's objections and lack of support ...
No, I do not 'change it up', I consider both, so do Ukrainians and obviously so do Russians. It is your problem that you are fixated on the NATO issue...
The support for joining NATO was about equal in 2002 and decreased from then (as the Russian opposition increased), but the support for closer ties wi...
It is not a matter of my interpretation. Belarussians are dying and are jailed to get out from the rule of 'one guy' and do not mind the other one. Pe...
Not exactly, the two are not even simliar. While the US did many things which should be condemned (like the war in Iraq), the influence it has in its ...
Maybe I was not clear - when I wrote Russia 'wants it back' I meant the control, not the physical territories. In fact, in many ways it is more conven...
The difference is that if Russians oppose the Ukrainian independence in general, then the conflict would likely arise sooner or later anyway, as Ukrai...
Oh, so now it is 'social engineering', because you simply cannot accept the fact that it is Ukrainians themselves that finally want to leave the Russi...
Great, so finally we agree that at that period NATO was not seen by Russia as a direct threat. But Yanukovych was ousted due to the course of events i...
Comments