You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Ludwig V

Comments

I wasn't arguing that secular morality is not part of how we bring up our children. So I don't disagree with you at all. My perception of the politica...
February 02, 2026 at 21:21
Are you saying that the apple is a constituent of the episode during the first 10 seconds? I would then point out that the relationship of the apple t...
February 02, 2026 at 11:21
I think that both religion and politics were tabu, except on specific occasions. I don't know about wider society, but it seems to be still observed i...
February 02, 2026 at 08:39
A lot depends on what you mean by "separation". I was tempted to say that it is relatively simple to sort out at the institutional level. Quite a lot ...
February 01, 2026 at 18:06
H'm. Perhaps we agree, then. What is perceived is the same object in both time periods. I see the apple during the first time period, so I also see th...
January 31, 2026 at 23:14
So would I, except that I would specify that you see the apple placed in front of you. The delay in transmission does not affect this. I don't see wha...
January 31, 2026 at 18:49
There may be some level at which our personality favours one kind of theory over others. Scepticism seems to be a good candidate - a yearning for cert...
January 30, 2026 at 22:48
There is a problem from the start here. You think that "the direct object of perception" refers to something. If I've understood you, you don't know w...
January 30, 2026 at 21:21
It's certainly stupid if "direct awareness" is defined as "by introspection" - perceptions that are guaranteed correct, even if they are wrong. But, i...
January 30, 2026 at 10:08
In: Infinity  — view comment
I think it's just a coincidence. I used this example because it occurred to me at the time, not because I had read it before. I imagine that there was...
January 28, 2026 at 06:50
In: Infinity  — view comment
Thanks for that distinction. I wasn't aware. I'm glad you agree with me. I had noticed that people often speak as if the procedure (or function) someh...
January 27, 2026 at 22:47
In: Infinity  — view comment
OK. In that case, you carry out the procedure. What bothers me is the idea that a formula like S(n)=n+1 is not a set of instructions about how to do s...
January 27, 2026 at 22:27
In: Infinity  — view comment
Who said anything about reducing being to value? Hierarchy, yes. Order not necessarily. Alphabetical order doesn't imply value. Oh, dear. How can one ...
January 27, 2026 at 22:13
Statements do not always have clear meanings and sometime people deliberately mislead us and sometimes we just get it wrong. But not always. The fact ...
January 27, 2026 at 21:39
... and they don't always show their minds via what they say. Feeling the water and reporting feedback is one thing. Putting on (or taking off) clothe...
January 27, 2026 at 19:16
That's odd. That's exactly how I feel about what people say. I would much rather trust how they behave. Actions, as they say, speak louder than words.
January 27, 2026 at 18:02
I'm afraid that philosophers are not immune from the temptation to coin descriptions of doctrines they disagree with that have a rhetorical effect on ...
January 27, 2026 at 15:40
In: Infinity  — view comment
However, in the case of symbols used in calculation, an equivalence can be established. So you think that "to be is to be the value of a variable" is ...
January 27, 2026 at 15:22
In: Infinity  — view comment
I was referring to the previous two posts. Beyond that, there's much that I agree with, but I still have puzzles (questions), which is not quite the s...
January 27, 2026 at 10:32
In: Infinity  — view comment
I don't think I can add anything to your replies. I would likely just confuse the issue.
January 26, 2026 at 21:47
In: Infinity  — view comment
You are right of course. Like you, I am disinclined to back either option. But I prefer to treat each claim as a comparison or analogy and to note sim...
January 26, 2026 at 16:19
In: Infinity  — view comment
That's fair enough. Thank you for your comments.
January 25, 2026 at 19:33
In: Infinity  — view comment
Do you mean the premiss that space can be infinitely divided, not merely conceptually, but also physically? I think most people would accept some vers...
January 25, 2026 at 18:57
In: Infinity  — view comment
OK. As I said, I don't think the Aristotelian account clarifies anything much. If anything, it deepens the mystery. Perish the thought of denying that...
January 25, 2026 at 11:41
You may be underestimating him (or his advisers). I've heard a suggestion that the plan is to provoke serious unrest so that the Insurrection Act can ...
January 25, 2026 at 10:41
In: Infinity  — view comment
I wouldn't argue Wittgenstein's point, though doesn't that point us firmly in the direction of the Aristotelian distinction between actual and potenti...
January 25, 2026 at 10:32
In: Infinity  — view comment
No, it is simpler than that. We are using "medium" is different ways. I think. For me, empty space is not a mediium. A medium is substance that fills ...
January 24, 2026 at 16:47
In: Infinity  — view comment
I agree with everything you say. But it is not easy to say it clearly. What bothers me is that we seem driven to talk about processes in connection wi...
January 24, 2026 at 16:41
I agree with you. If I'm right aht Milton's defence of God, that the Fall was, in the end, a Good Thing, seems to me the deepest problem here.
January 24, 2026 at 16:38
I recently read this book. It was a real treat. I don't often finish a book thinking that I should read it again immediately. But I do still resist re...
January 24, 2026 at 11:39
In: Infinity  — view comment
It seems to me that the question of a medium in space is secondary. The first move is to set up a co-ordinates and rules for plotting the position of ...
January 24, 2026 at 11:02
In: Infinity  — view comment
Let me try to be a bit clearer. I cited the bumble bee just because it was a case where there isn't much, if any, doubt about how the world is as oppo...
January 23, 2026 at 00:13
In: Infinity  — view comment
That would indeed be of great interest. I wonder if we could construct a reply that they might have made? It may well do so. It may also set you in fr...
January 22, 2026 at 22:34
In: Infinity  — view comment
Of course. The ghost at the feast, perhaps. Well, one could simply argue that the argument is not a proof, but a reductio of a certain approach to spa...
January 22, 2026 at 08:36
In: Infinity  — view comment
Thanks, Banno. I knew I would not get it quite right.
January 22, 2026 at 06:14
In: Infinity  — view comment
I think it is important to underline that the mapping between the sets is identified between the first few steps in the series (I may have the exact t...
January 21, 2026 at 22:08
In: Infinity  — view comment
I realize that you see the contradiction as implicit and unavoidable. But you are not recognizing the meaning given to the terms within the system. "c...
January 21, 2026 at 15:47
In: Infinity  — view comment
It is possible, and has been the case at times in this discussion, that both sides of a debate are thinking in terms of "straightforwardly true". But ...
January 20, 2026 at 19:37
In: Infinity  — view comment
I'm sorry. I should have said "separates", not "divides". Can you think of a form of measurement that is not counting - apart from guessing or "judgin...
January 19, 2026 at 21:36
In: Infinity  — view comment
Are you suggesting that is a reason for rejecting his conclusions? Either way, I would suggest that we leave Cantor's theology as a matter between Can...
January 19, 2026 at 18:12
In: Infinity  — view comment
There's a lot that could be said about that. It is tempting to classify some rules as habits. Habits neither have, nor require, any kind of justificat...
January 18, 2026 at 10:09
In: Infinity  — view comment
I didn't know that came from Ramsey. But it is in the same spirit. Instead of having to remember each specific F and that it is G, and that my list of...
January 17, 2026 at 20:20
In: Infinity  — view comment
So you do know that the series is infinite without completing the count of them all. Zeno, if I remember right, thought that he had developed a proof ...
January 17, 2026 at 18:09
In: Infinity  — view comment
How do you know that the natural numbers go on for ever? Have you tried to count them and failed? That doesn't prove that they go on for ever. But per...
January 16, 2026 at 08:48
Quiite so. I'm afraid I'm among those who doesn't want to be bothered. And then you will be locked in for life. Then I find myself thinking that it wo...
January 15, 2026 at 22:08
I can see that moving towards subscriptions and rents is better business than selling people copies of software. That seems to need continuous updatin...
January 15, 2026 at 18:03
Quite so. I think there may be people who think that things will get better once Trump's term ends. We'll see. But even if they did get better, I can'...
January 15, 2026 at 16:32
Exactly. If you are painting from a mental image, how could you distinguish between mistakes you have made because you are not very good at painting m...
January 15, 2026 at 15:42
Isn't that a moral and political question, rather than a strictly economic issue? In any case, I doubt if it is reasonable to expect to draw those lin...
January 15, 2026 at 15:39
Yes. It seems to me that the fact that we do not perceive light waves as such is important. Light and sound are the means by which we perceive, not wh...
January 15, 2026 at 15:16