You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Ludwig V

Comments

I think I can make sense of that. I've taken a vow not to be sucked into commenting on anything quantum. I'll only make an ass of myself. But I can't ...
August 02, 2025 at 10:09
Obviously. Consequently, we are inescapably part of the universe that we observe and interact with. There is an understanding of this that says that o...
August 02, 2025 at 09:58
The whole universe could, I guess, be regarded as a single body. For a universe that consists of a single body, there is no way to differentiate rest ...
August 02, 2025 at 08:50
Yes, there's a real problem about EPP. The root of the problem is the idea that something can exist before any predicates apply to it, or that somethi...
August 02, 2025 at 08:12
This reads to me as a specification of something that may well be possible. But without specific cases, one cannot assess what it really means. That s...
August 02, 2025 at 07:54
So what is more fundamental than that? Oh, I see. The criterion you are applying is simply "being in a relation with something that exists". I can mak...
August 01, 2025 at 17:27
I was very impressed by this post. It demonstrates things about language that most of us have to gesture at. At the same time, your post manages to ex...
August 01, 2025 at 13:22
It could. The question would be what impact would that have on how one thought about that process. I'm very suspicious of the idea that we, or the uni...
August 01, 2025 at 09:27
I think that may be common ground. The issue may be what the implications are. I think we have also agreed that our knowledge of how the world was bef...
July 31, 2025 at 10:31
A neat point. I'm not sure how convincing it would be for a true idealist. I think you might find that they might argue that since the cosmos was not ...
July 31, 2025 at 08:43
I think that one cannot name something by merely thinking, because the name has to be shared to be meaningful. Hence I focused on the speaking rather ...
July 30, 2025 at 17:18
It may well be special because it is observed. But observing something doesn’t normally cause it to exist. So even if it is special because it is obse...
July 30, 2025 at 17:06
Well, if a difficult philosophical point is not worth spending time on, what is? I could not persist unless you were prepared to persist with me - so ...
July 30, 2025 at 10:37
A tempting argument. But you beg the question, which is whether speaking of something affects it. An obvious question is, "In what way is it affected"...
July 30, 2025 at 10:32
Yes. This is very like the argument that Berkeley calls his Master Argument, because he says he will rely on that argument in favour of his idealism a...
July 30, 2025 at 08:02
In answer to the second question, the short answer is no. In order to count something as visible it is only necessary to demonstrate that it is capabl...
July 30, 2025 at 07:41
So, I went through your OP carefully. I’m afraid that I do not come away with a general criterion for mind-independence. So I won’t be able to meet yo...
July 28, 2025 at 21:31
You have noticed that I am cautious. That’s true (most of the time). So, with due caution, that looks like something I can accept. Apart from deleting...
July 28, 2025 at 11:21
That sounds like my cup of tea. But which article exactly. What if a thing is the cause of a sensation? I'm very glad to hear it. It all depends on wh...
July 27, 2025 at 23:30
I'm a bit confused. Are you saying that the methods by which we come to know what something is aren't methods at all? That seems odd. How did you come...
July 27, 2025 at 20:01
Quite so. No-one except Nietzsche seems to have spotted the distinction between compulsion and determinism. There's something we agree on. I'm offerin...
July 27, 2025 at 10:02
I'm sorry this has taken so long. I hope this is not a disappointment to you. All these quotations come from the original post for the thread "The Min...
July 27, 2025 at 07:47
Yes - "too compromised" means "not working as it should or normally does." If their mental state was normal, we would hold them responsible. Yet a det...
July 26, 2025 at 13:40
you can imagine that I'm not paticularly sympathetic - especially to the second sentence. However, I've read the first paragraph of your thread and wi...
July 25, 2025 at 22:53
Then I'm afraid I don't see what you are getting at. I'm afraid I'm lost again. This doesn't help me at all. I don't understand any of the above. A ge...
July 25, 2025 at 18:26
Are you also saying that there is no connection between those two facts? I don't see that things that don't exist are relevant here. Mind-independence...
July 24, 2025 at 19:31
It may be that I/we are stretching the language. There's not a lot of popular interest in the modes of existence - even, I suspect, among philosophers...
July 24, 2025 at 09:29
I think I understand that. So "unicorn" is not an irrelevant example. I like it just because it is not straightforward, but requires some thought. Tha...
July 23, 2025 at 19:40
It's an excellent topic. It might well. The variations will be very instructive. If I believe that the moon is exists independently of what I, or anyo...
July 22, 2025 at 19:34
I think it helps. I don't think there is much missing in the physical explanation of a rainbow. A rainbow, understood as we perceive it and conceive o...
July 21, 2025 at 11:15
Well, I guess that's an opening for me to chip in. I do have a problem, however, that I haven't got my head around what the criteria are for mind-inde...
July 21, 2025 at 09:22
I'm no expert, either. But somehow you are presenting the issues in a way I can get my head around. There are definitely strange things going on in ph...
July 19, 2025 at 19:51
I don't disagree with that. The problems with conscription are partly ethical and partly practical. So conscription even of adults is a step over the ...
July 19, 2025 at 19:11
I don't think conscription is OK. Period. Nobody likes it, not even the army. If you have to force someone to join the army (or navy, air force, whate...
July 19, 2025 at 18:30
Yes. Good point. Thank you.
July 19, 2025 at 12:34
Yes, indeed. I suspect that motive is very much present in this case. Yes. Getting those in power to vote for something that will make their lives mor...
July 19, 2025 at 08:30
Insofar as recognition of another ideology as disagreeing with oneself means recognizing (often at the same time as denying) that the other side are a...
July 19, 2025 at 07:57
Yes. I know. But I thought it was a theoretical discussion. I didn't suggest assuming anything. On the contrary, I suggested evaluating the informatio...
July 18, 2025 at 17:35
Do you mean that someone will have to write these tests of competence - with the issue that a miracle of dispassionate objectivity would be needed? Th...
July 18, 2025 at 09:30
If I've got it right, the prefrontal cortex doesn't stop developing until around 25. So that ship sailed long, long ago. Yes, it is true that younger ...
July 18, 2025 at 08:14
That's been the classic arguments against democracy since the Athenian expedition to Sicily 415-413 BCE. Plato builds a political philosophy around it...
July 18, 2025 at 07:39
OK. I agree it's not going to change the world.
July 17, 2025 at 05:55
This reminds me of the Aristotle's practical syllogism, which is supposed to give a structure that applies to all actions whatever. In a way, it does,...
July 16, 2025 at 22:36
You put the difference very neatly. Only, I didn't intend it as a criticism, but as an analysis. BTW, yes, I had thought of Ryle when Ramsey first cam...
July 16, 2025 at 08:10
That's a rather charitable interpretation of "forced". It's an interesting issue. On the one hand, it seems ideologically loaded and it is hard to bel...
July 15, 2025 at 13:14
Well, gambling was important in the development of probability theory from the beginning. So it's no surprise that it crops up here. More than that, i...
July 15, 2025 at 09:45
It's a good point. Yet arguments do fly back and forth between ideologies, even though in principle they do not recognize how radical the break is at ...
July 15, 2025 at 09:19
I think I may be a bit more sceptical than you. But I agree that you have outlined the context in which we need to think about this technique. The dis...
July 15, 2025 at 07:20
Help with consistency is always a good idea. Dropping induction, I fear, may be more difficult. Pavlovian conditioning works at levels beyond the reac...
July 15, 2025 at 05:22
OK. That makes sense. I'm trying to keep the enthusiasm for Bayes in proportion by anchoring our conversation in how we do things, or how we think we ...
July 14, 2025 at 16:40