You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Tate

Comments

Why do you think it's warranted?
July 19, 2022 at 19:18
Because: I mean, if this is true, then how do you know about mind independent objects? What source of knowledge do you have other than your senses? Ho...
July 19, 2022 at 19:06
Why do you have confidence the standard model if you learned about it through your senses?
July 19, 2022 at 18:35
You agree with phenomenalism because of subatomic particles?
July 19, 2022 at 18:11
So science has access to the properties of mind independent objects? How is this possible if those properties are not present in experience?
July 19, 2022 at 18:04
Isn't the scientific data about things that are past your senses?
July 19, 2022 at 17:32
That's phenomenalism as I understand it. I guess my question would be: what supports this claim?
July 19, 2022 at 15:59
That metaphysical claims are nonsense.
July 19, 2022 at 14:27
In the TLP, he cautions against making claims of that kind (that's the overall message of the TLP, anyway). Russell did believe that direct experience...
July 19, 2022 at 14:07
"Every modern philosopher accepted some version of the theory of ideas—the view that we immediately perceive certain mental entities called ideas, but...
July 19, 2022 at 14:05
Hume was a phenomenalist. Why would exploring his ideas go in a different thread?
July 19, 2022 at 12:34
On precious metals? Like what?
July 19, 2022 at 00:12
I don't think that's what Hume was thinking. Would you want to explore his ideas more? By going through the logic of bundle theory?
July 18, 2022 at 23:04
Population growth is around zero in Europe, China, and the US. It's actually threatening to start going negative. Why do you think that is?
July 18, 2022 at 22:28
Of course. Why would you think I don't know that?
July 18, 2022 at 22:04
Phenomenalism just advises we not invest too much in the idea of concrete objects which possess ever changing properties. It says that an object basic...
July 18, 2022 at 21:07
:lol:
July 18, 2022 at 20:13
Running out of precious metals to make phones doesn't affect the climate. Burning any fossil fuels at all does. We either need to come up with a good ...
July 18, 2022 at 19:45
True. That doesn't affect the climate, though.
July 18, 2022 at 19:13
There really isn't anywhere for it to go. It all just goes round and round.
July 18, 2022 at 16:56
Username checks out.
July 18, 2022 at 15:54
The solution is a profound technological shift.
July 18, 2022 at 15:52
I see. Withdrawing from drugs can be fatal, so an addict probably should take drugs to avoid death. Same thing: If we try to abruptly withdraw from fo...
July 18, 2022 at 15:34
Paywall. Could you summarize?
July 18, 2022 at 15:01
In the TLP, language can be used to talk about the world. The world is whatever happens to be the case. If the proposition that I saw a red truck is t...
July 18, 2022 at 13:37
"the sauce is the boss"
July 18, 2022 at 12:02
I think this video will help: https://youtu.be/I7JBAcxreBw
July 18, 2022 at 02:28
The title of the OP is phenomenalism, not phenomenology. Hume was a phenomenalist.
July 18, 2022 at 00:23
Oh. There's another interpretation after that. If I understand it correctly, it says that the Tractacus can be taken as a demonstration. No one climbs...
July 18, 2022 at 00:16
Who are you directing this question toward? Wittgenstein? Us? Yourself?
July 18, 2022 at 00:03
David Hume will still be famous after I'm dead and buried, so I'll hold back on calling him a philosophical novice. :grin:
July 18, 2022 at 00:01
So we have interpretations by decade: 1960s:. mystical readings 1980s:. metaphysical readings, some insisting on realism 1990s: the "resolute reading"...
July 17, 2022 at 20:40
For some interpreters, TLP 3.3 foreshadows the private language argument: "Only propositions have sense; only in the nexus of a proposition does a nam...
July 17, 2022 at 18:37
Reading Schopenhauer left me pondering the limits of the intellect, at how some intellectual avenues seem to be dead ends. This is a theme I'm picking...
July 17, 2022 at 16:05
This is just garbled.
July 17, 2022 at 16:02
I wasn't saying Kant was a mystic. I was saying that the metaphysics Wittgenstein offers would be compatible with a lot of different ontologies. He's ...
July 17, 2022 at 14:32
Yes. An inference regarding a hidden state is never called an "observation." I'm glad to see papers aren't being written with that kind of confusion.
July 17, 2022 at 14:28
If you recall a specific case of a hidden state being referred to as "observed", could you point that out? As I mentioned, in Markov analysis in gener...
July 17, 2022 at 13:50
In the uses of the term I'm familiar with "observed" and "hidden" are very distinct. Could you give an example of the two being used to refer to the s...
July 17, 2022 at 12:05
Sorry, I wasn't talking about perception. I was talking about hidden states in general. It makes more sense to me to say we have some degree of confid...
July 17, 2022 at 10:44
Cool!
July 17, 2022 at 01:01
I think phenomenalism is from Hume's bundle theory, isn't it? You can't imagine an object that has no properties. And somehow we get from there to: an...
July 17, 2022 at 00:25
.'The nature of his new philosophy is heralded as anti-systematic through and through, yet still conducive to genuine philosophical understanding of t...
July 16, 2022 at 23:49
"To sample the future, what you do is first sample the last state, given its distribution. Then sample the next hidden state, using the transition mat...
July 16, 2022 at 20:57
Nah. There's an 80 percent chance of rain. I don't know it's going to rain.
July 16, 2022 at 20:29
So we're not trying to be serious here?
July 16, 2022 at 19:20
You can read it. If you don't like it, fine. If you think his message is mystical, fine. If you think he was a materialist, fine. I'm going to turn my...
July 16, 2022 at 19:06
You know what happened when you tested the model. That gives some degree of confidence in your subsequent inferences. No need to overstate things.
July 16, 2022 at 18:30
Yes. I'm not sure why Wittgenstein bugs you. If you're a Schopenhauer/Tolstoy/Kierkegaard fan, it seems to me you'd at least be curious about what's g...
July 16, 2022 at 18:18
I guess the metaphysics he presents would be compatible with Kant. It would be compatible with some kind of mystical view. Does it matter though? In t...
July 16, 2022 at 18:16