You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Mitchell

Comments

"In ordinary English, whenever we use the noun ‘being’ we refer to human beings, and sometimes to higher animals" So there is no such thing as inanima...
December 15, 2017 at 21:01
"So much better than the "arrogance" espoused by the "New Atheists." " Ah, the sweet sound of sarcasm fills the air.
December 15, 2017 at 20:55
"Do not do evil in order to brinig about good." St. Paul
December 15, 2017 at 00:44
"The good that I would do, I do not do; the evil that I hate, that is what I do." St. Paul
December 15, 2017 at 00:43
"What would you count in the category "universal" that you would also count as real?" Mathematical concepts & truths; Scientific Laws, (at least) term...
December 14, 2017 at 23:48
I think, but may be mistaken, is that all pantheism needs is the idea of a universal mind, inherent in all things. Panpsychism would have the universa...
December 14, 2017 at 18:00
"What's wrong with Platonic Realism?" Feser's objection focuses of Plato's postulation of a "third realm", transcending the physical and mental realms...
December 14, 2017 at 14:37
Pantheism? It seems to be making some inroads into Philosophy of Mind of late.
December 14, 2017 at 14:19
I found this article https://philarchive.org/archive/CHAAAF-3 "Augustine’s Argument for the Existence of God" by H. Chandler.
December 13, 2017 at 22:33
The link leads me to a blank page. Fortunately, I have that volume in my Library, so I'll look up page 24. Thanks
December 13, 2017 at 21:53
I would question two things. (1) What is meant by "greater" in "greater than the mind". (2) The first premise seems to need argument. In fact, I would...
December 13, 2017 at 21:47
BTW: "God would be eternal truth as such" I honestly have no clue what that means.
December 13, 2017 at 20:11
I can see how that would be where he winds up, but I don't see the move from (1) eternal truths are real to (2) eternal truths must exist in the mind ...
December 13, 2017 at 20:09
Greenwell's articulation on Augustine's "Proof" has much in common with Feser's "Argument from Mathematical and Logical Truths". Greenwell puts it: "O...
December 13, 2017 at 12:12
Thank you so much for your two links. His *Proofs* book seems to be too recent to generate much discussion.
December 13, 2017 at 11:44
I have a professor friend who teaches "Philosophy in Film" course, in which she showed Tarkovski's version. She claimed that Lem was distraught that "...
December 12, 2017 at 11:50
One of the questions that fascinated me was the relation of personal identity to the memories others have of you.
December 12, 2017 at 02:10
Yes! And I think that heat by radiation provides an example where the Aristotelian account of change fails. But then, some think I misunderstand that ...
December 11, 2017 at 23:05
Pages 60-63 is the discussion of "simultaneous causes"
December 11, 2017 at 23:00
His example of the coffee getting cold because of the cold air from the air conditioner. Also, his interpretation of "Formal Causality" seems to sugge...
December 11, 2017 at 14:49
I'm sorry, but I must be dense. I see two issues here. First issue is that any change requires an existing (actual) cause, for something cannot come f...
December 11, 2017 at 14:28
I don't have a problem with the notion of a sustaining cause, whose activity would be simultaneous, What I question is the notion of a hierarchy of su...
December 11, 2017 at 13:00
Addendum: The problem I have is with Feser's (Aristotle's and Aquinas's) view of causality. I'd like to think that it is not just a disagreement about...
December 11, 2017 at 01:40
Thanks andrewk. I posted my issue there, but will do so here as well. I have several problems with Feser's argument. 1. His Principle of (Aristotelian...
December 11, 2017 at 01:38
I have several problems with Feser's argument. 1. His Principle of (Aristotelian) Causality: Every change is a change from potentiality to actuality b...
December 11, 2017 at 01:31