Joshs

This sounds like the Aristotelian idea of time as change , change as continuity and continuity as akin to the continuity of magnitude. Eternity is lin...

But it is a continuity based on the continuity of magnitiude. “Aristotle says that time ‘follows’ change and change ‘follows’ magnitude. Aristotle use...

Then it needs to be made clearer. If we assume that what makes mathematics and logic possible is the view of time as the processual transformation of ...

But Heidegger claims that for Aristotle time itself is derived from motion, a continuous change within something enduringly objectively presence. So i...

We also have definitions of God that are not dependent on time. Or I should say, that believe themselves not to be dependent on time.

The fact that it does not know change and time doesn’t mean that change and time don’t underlie it. If you stare at the period at the end of this sent...

You don’t get formal logic without assuming that you can return to the same identical symbol from moment to moment in reflection or perception. The en...

Are you suggesting that Wittgenstein begins from hinge propositions ( taking them for granted) in the way that Frege begins from formal logic?

Yes, a thoroughgoing reduction leads us to this simpler beginning.

Are these discussions a competition for you? Take a look at the two paragraphs below by Husserl. The first describes sensations as we identify them ob...

Tell me what is represented in a=a.

It wouldnt be more, it would be less. That is, the ‘a’, ‘b’ and ‘c’ presume too much about the minimal condition for ‘presencing’.

There is no way around the fact that logic and any variety of mathematics cannot begin without first assuming a ‘present’ object ( which includes empt...

It may be wrong , but why don’t you do me the courtesy of answering my questions?

Why isn’t it an answer? What does first order calculus depend on? A=A is a relation between A and A. But what presupposition lies behind the invocatio...

All perceptual experiences are based on associative synthesis, wherein ‘higher’ senses are constituted out of simpler ones drawn from memory on the ba...

Because formal logic depends on the notion of the self-identical object. “A true object in the sense of logic is an object which is absolutely identic...

Any evidence-quotes from the later Wittgenstein for the idea that a language game is ‘in’ space? I don’t think you’ll find him describing space in thi...

The simplest sense impressions; color , sound ,touch sensation, are examples of basic intuitions for Husserl prior to their being synthetically connec...

I’d just like to point out that within phenomenology intuition means something quite different than the way it is being defined in the OP. “Husserl’s ...

I’m not sure how to answer this. If we equate space with ‘use’ as contextual performance and interaction we can clearly see the fundamentally temporal...

I think of neuro-cognitive models of the development of concepts of spatial relations which reveal perceived space as a product of a progressive proce...

I don’t see a contradiction here with either Wittgenstein or Heidegger. They are both talking about ‘doingness’ and ‘use’ in general, as you are.

Yes, thank you for finding it. Hard to type and hike at the same time.

He does t say beingness or existence are predicates. Or subjects. They mark the original relation between self and world before we idealize this binar...

Formal language , as a capacity humans possess due to brain structures , is one thing , but language understood in a much broader sense has been claim...

If this is true , then one can be justified in saying no more than this about the accomplishments of science. Newtonian physics did no more than clari...

Isn’t that what stories do?

Not for Heidegger. He has a very particular understanding of ‘world’ that is neither planned nor just ‘revealed’ , and not a product of reflective rea...

Yes, he makes the distinction between the ready to hand and the present to hand ( objectively present ). But he derives the present to hand from the r...

One doesn’t have to know why it was manufactured or for what purpose. Heidegger’s larger point is that , not only when we use something as a tool , bu...

Here’s a phenomenological way of putting it: “ “Equipment is “in order to.” This proposition has an ontological and not merely an ontical meaning; a b...

One doesnt have to accept Heidegger’s reading , but his analysis of Hegel’s model of time concludes that: “Hegel's con­cept of time presents the most ...

Now that’s what I call garbled. It’s garbled but I can still recognize the traditional notion of time dating back to Aristotle in it. This is what Hei...

Those are the Kantians. We phenomenologists don’t buy that unknowable stuff. Our motto is ‘To the things themselves!’.

I felt bad for threatening to take away his security blanket.

I know that apokrisis has gone on record as being anti naive or direct realism

Relax. Giving up naive realism doesn’t mean simply doubting what you know and preventing you from doing what you previously thought you could do in th...

You should ask @Isaac how the predictive processing model of perception treats naive realism. Here’s Lisa Barret , one of the proponents of predictive...

Naive realism simply isnt backed up by recent research in perceptual psychology or the more sophisticated thinking in A.I.

Mine too.

A weak point. Xtrix and I have differing readings of Heidegger , but they’re not that different. We both grasp in our different ways what makes Heideg...

I can add to that : If we were to be shown right now two pictures by Paul Klee, in the original, which he painted in the year of his death-the waterco...

I wanted to add a comment on the Heidegger quotes I took from the introduction to Being and Time. He begins the book saying his aim is to answer the q...

The ‘is’ is a happening, and the ‘is’ is another word for being. “ As a seeking, questioning needs prior guidance from what it seeks. The meaning of b...

I’d have to think about how Wittgenstein would distinguish place from time , but my sense is it would be secondary and derivative from context, which ...

Except that if you examine the language of being primarily via predicate logic you’ll have Wittgenstein rolling over in his grave. Witt didn’t write a...

It sounds like that from the quote , but for Husserl there isn’t a primordial beginning of consciousness in terms of a particular content that all hig...

I’m getting this from Heidegger. He uses lots of similies for Being. Happening, occurrence, the in-between , the ontological difference, the ‘as’ stru...

This is how Husserl modeled the pre-interpreted basis of experience: “Every apperception in which we apprehend at a glance, and noticingly grasp, obje...