You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Joshs

Comments

You refer to the being of a ‘we’. In what sense is it a being if there is no distinction? Isn’t pure absence of differentiation non-being?
January 05, 2023 at 22:43
Interesting. How would that work? Kind of like meditative awareness?
January 05, 2023 at 22:18
Try this: https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/self-consciousness-phenomenological/
January 05, 2023 at 21:30
I think that the Marcusian model , with its reliance on libidinal energy and it’s notions of social conditioning, is too reductive and monolithic. It ...
January 05, 2023 at 20:30
Aren’t we talking about different epistemological accounts of causation? For conscious actions we use an intentional motivational account , and for ph...
January 05, 2023 at 19:21
Absolutely, and Husserl’s natural attitude.
January 05, 2023 at 14:31
Alternately, we could say that to make progress, the realm of the physical will have to be rethought such that we recognize that the subjective was al...
January 05, 2023 at 01:05
I’m not convinced that it is in the interest of ‘advanced consumer society’ to keep personal identity fragmented and internally conflicted. On the con...
January 05, 2023 at 00:01
What circumstances do you think require a reason via those that do not? Some are perfectly happy with the current status of quantum theory , and other...
January 04, 2023 at 20:39
You mean like S-M? It hurts so good? Pleasure through pain? Harm me, baby?
January 04, 2023 at 19:19
I discovered when I was very young that I had a talent for drawing. This was the first skill that I was good at, and I enjoyed sharing my art with fam...
January 04, 2023 at 19:13
This seems to be just the contrast pole of the ‘Is good indefinable’ thread.
January 04, 2023 at 18:37
:up:
January 04, 2023 at 18:00
I must have missed how your definition avoids being circular. Did you somewhere indicate how good is more or other than just what benefits an individu...
January 04, 2023 at 17:58
‘Why’ questions have to do with the fact that explanations in science aren't just about what works, they are about coming up with different ways of co...
January 04, 2023 at 17:45
To be fair to hypericin, the recent ambitions to explain consciousness were only possible as a result of innovations in thinking about biological proc...
January 04, 2023 at 14:49
Whenever our sciences leave us with an arbitrary starting point , this should be an impetus to start asking ‘why’ questions. Asking why a physical con...
January 04, 2023 at 14:39
I think all absolutes are also, at the same time, relatives. For instance, the qualitative content of a moment of awareness is contingent and relative...
January 04, 2023 at 14:11
Definitions are circular within a finite frame. The circular series of terms for ‘good’ used in this thread that I referred to are mutually defined ac...
January 03, 2023 at 22:17
The organizational dynamics I laid out don’t have to be understood in naturalized fashion. In fact I think it’s best understood as a metaphysical pres...
January 03, 2023 at 20:30
You lost me. How exactly are you understanding ‘proper functioning’ and what does it have to do with the normatively oriented organizational dynamics ...
January 03, 2023 at 18:50
What a mess. So far every contribution to this thread has used circular terms to ‘define’ the good. Even fairness implies a moral notion of equivalenc...
January 03, 2023 at 18:24
Davidson thinks he is dismissing the very notion of a conceptual scheme, when in fact he is only dismissing the Quinean model and its underlying Kanti...
January 03, 2023 at 02:11
I think I like this characterization of my position. But as regards Banno, I would ask you if you think that his thinking is significantly removed fro...
January 02, 2023 at 01:43
As others have pointed out, it may be the particular organizational terms ( reductive causality) in which the sciences of physics and chemistry are re...
January 01, 2023 at 19:45
This quote from Joseph Rouse belongs to a paper in which he critiques Steven Crowell’s Heideggerian account of identifying with a vocation. Even thoug...
December 31, 2022 at 15:35
Except that on one side are those who find the symbolism of logical formalism important, perhaps indispensable , because it gets at the root of all th...
December 30, 2022 at 16:23
Reformed analytic philosophers like Rorty will argue the opposite. Once we divest ourselves of our temptation to assume intrinsic features of the worl...
December 30, 2022 at 14:55
It’s interesting that you didn’t add that he knew WHY they were thinking what they were thinking, which is much more important. For instance, perhaps ...
December 30, 2022 at 14:10
Neither what is only ‘in you’ nor what is externally institutional get at how we understand language. The two need to be intimately interwoven such th...
December 30, 2022 at 14:00
I’m sorry I haven’t made myself very clear. Predicational logic assumes already defined and separable units or parts.The fact that these parts are alr...
December 29, 2022 at 22:18
Do you believe that radically relativistic perspectives of truth within philosophy, such as we see with postmodernist and post-structuralist writers, ...
December 29, 2022 at 18:43
Why does it seem to do exactly that? Because logical analysis uses at its ground-floor starting point the product of a genesis of sense, the point aft...
December 29, 2022 at 17:42
I think that’s difficult to do because one has to have a reason and a way to modify how one approaches the situation. All we have to go on is how we h...
December 28, 2022 at 19:03
It is about intentionality, that is , aboutness, which is an act of doing. To intend is to be about something in a certain way, and there cannot be a ...
December 28, 2022 at 18:47
A number of schools of philosophy, as well as researchers in perceptual psychology, believe that a ‘now’ divorced from memories of a past is a now wit...
December 28, 2022 at 17:23
Isn’t acting spontaneously still a making reference to one’s accumulated experience, which is shaped by their culture? Is t the immediate ‘now’ always...
December 28, 2022 at 14:52
My argument, drawing from Husserl, is that fa is not an analysis of predication so much as a naive restatement of the idealization that predication re...
December 28, 2022 at 03:41
I don’t think you mean to say that this is the only function of the word ‘is’, because it can do many things in a sentence. I assume you’re trying to ...
December 27, 2022 at 22:39
I didn’t mean to suggest that the ‘is’ is necessary in order for predication to do its job. My point was that whenever the ‘is’ makes its appearance i...
December 27, 2022 at 20:43
If it is in a sentence, it plays a semantic role in that sentence, albeit one that can vary widely in importance depending on the context. Components ...
December 27, 2022 at 13:39
‘Snow is white’: In this case , the ‘is’ tells us that white is a dependent attribute of snow. ‘Snow is snow’: In this case, the ‘is’ tells us that sn...
December 27, 2022 at 01:16
It has to be something. It carries a meaning, and the meaning changes with the structure of the logical relation. Logic doesn’t consist of S’s and P’s...
December 26, 2022 at 23:12
Thank you for that exemplification of how some of us use the word ‘reality’.
December 26, 2022 at 22:35
The fly-people?
December 26, 2022 at 22:01
Every product of culture, without exception, must be continually reinterpreted for each era. This goes for music, art, literature, history, science an...
December 26, 2022 at 17:59
I guess Foucault won’t be on your reading list any time soon.
December 26, 2022 at 17:44
Perhaps the distinction Husserl makes between the pre-predicative and the predicative stratum of constitution (and his notion of pre-predicative judgm...
December 25, 2022 at 23:12
I was going to respond to your comment on the expression of a rule, and then realized I didn’t actually disagree with it. From a Husserlian vantage, t...
December 25, 2022 at 00:26
[
December 24, 2022 at 14:52