You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Myttenar

['Member']Joined: November 27, 2017 at 19:30Last active: December 13, 2017 at 02:562 discussions59 comments

Bio

Perceptionist- truth is simply an average of a subset of mathematical probabilities and therefore can be deduced and expresses mathematically given the information used to deduce any truth is correct and information must be collected from every perspective. Further consideration should be given to perspectives capabilities of observation from dimensions beyond our own perspective and the possibility of the reverse.

Discussions (2)

Comments

In: Philosophy in our society  — view comment
well said. I am not in a good mind frame to brain at the moment or i would attempt to formulate a more provocative response. Later, I hope.
December 05, 2017 at 17:45
In: The experience of awareness  — view comment
Is that not what you did with what you have expressed here?
December 04, 2017 at 02:19
In: Is the human race a virus?  — view comment
Scientific classification is mammal but humans are a little different than most mammals, though I'm no biologist..
December 02, 2017 at 03:10
In: What is NOTHING?  — view comment
Again, as a frame of reference nothing needs no comparison, it is universal. Comparison arises between "things". I agree to this as part of my argumen...
December 02, 2017 at 00:40
In: Philosophy in our society  — view comment
This information + logic is why the man knows to fix the pump. Repeat process for next step. Information + logic. It's that simple
December 01, 2017 at 02:24
In: Philosophy in our society  — view comment
since deductions are made in the process, logic has been used. I'm not sure where the problem in understanding that is, I assumed it was common knowle...
December 01, 2017 at 01:39
In: Philosophy in our society  — view comment
Take for example a man attempting to fix an electric pump. Logic is the reason he is fixing it, first of all from the proposition of "does it work" wi...
November 30, 2017 at 23:53
In: Philosophy in our society  — view comment
I would disagree to this statement on the grounds that one can logically identify a problem for example. We can logically deduce if goals are met. We ...
November 30, 2017 at 23:24
In: What is NOTHING?  — view comment
"Doesn't that mean you are implying that at least in some places there is an absence of nothing?" Well yes obviously, every place where something exis...
November 30, 2017 at 22:08
In: What is NOTHING?  — view comment
Forgive me for assuming the point was made, I should have expanded. I believe an error is made when the idea of 0 is being regarded as a quantifiable ...
November 30, 2017 at 22:00
In: What is NOTHING?  — view comment
"The absence of evidence is not evidence of absence"
November 30, 2017 at 20:46
In: Machines should take over 90% of jobs and money should not exist  — view comment
I have had the same belief and hope for a more utopian society also, but this requires a change in perspective of our entire race to one that acts as ...
November 30, 2017 at 19:19
In: Philosophy in our society  — view comment
" I don't think there is a logical process that will solve any of our problems." So it follows that these problems then are illogical problems?
November 30, 2017 at 18:51
In: What is NOTHING?  — view comment
And I'm just going to point out here that nothing is, in fact not everywhere. I think the problem here is the attempt to assign value to nothing when ...
November 29, 2017 at 23:00
In: What is NOTHING?  — view comment
"doesn't it confuse you when you quantify N and realize that you have assigned it a property and it ceases to exist? — Myttenar Nothing is real anyway...
November 29, 2017 at 21:53
In: Welcome to The Philosophy Forum - an introduction thread  — view comment
Intro with a Solid argument though :D
November 29, 2017 at 09:23
In: What is NOTHING?  — view comment
This reminds me of the p=np problem for some reason.... Anyways I just wanted to ask, doesn't it confuse you when you quantify N and realize that you ...
November 29, 2017 at 08:50
In: Welcome to The Philosophy Forum - an introduction thread  — view comment
1. Everyone loves Oscar Meyer weiners 2. I will act in a way conducive to creating a life in which I am loved by all. Therefor I will become an Oscar ...
November 29, 2017 at 08:27
In: Truth - defining true and false  — view comment
"both propositions, both true. But what in their respective truths is the same? " Since "strawberries taste good" is subjective I'm going to say persp...
November 29, 2017 at 07:44
In: Philosophy in our society  — view comment
I actually agree with You, but in my perspective of a person is going to be receptive and responsive to an idea has little to do with how sophisticate...
November 29, 2017 at 07:30
In: Conversation: Time expressed as energy  — view comment
Actually thats the one big hurdle of the thought and the reason I doubt it's validity.. I assume the link is about a Rob Bryanton idea, imagining the ...
November 29, 2017 at 05:41
In: Conversation: Time expressed as energy  — view comment
I see your point. From my perspective i do understand your expression of time as a series of frames, and I am saying that there is, as part of that su...
November 29, 2017 at 05:29
In: Conversation: Time expressed as energy  — view comment
It is still explained by the same model of spacetime. It would refine it to show time as an energetic interaction between what we consider spacetime a...
November 29, 2017 at 05:26
In: Truth - defining true and false  — view comment
"it" was in reference to your post about correspondence theory.. Thought and belief without propositional content.. to me resembles instinct. I had as...
November 29, 2017 at 05:19
In: Philosophy in our society  — view comment
Your position on this is quite obvious so allow me to ask, do you recognize the problem that the statement calls our attention to and if so, is there ...
November 29, 2017 at 05:10
In: Philosophy in our society  — view comment
Nailed it :)
November 29, 2017 at 05:06
In: Truth - defining true and false  — view comment
does that mean then that some beliefs are inherent and are never questioned?
November 29, 2017 at 04:46
In: Philosophy in our society  — view comment
you're right, my language became stronger after the repeated attacks, I apologize for responding to the question with emotion clouded judgent. Try a r...
November 29, 2017 at 04:29
In: Philosophy in our society  — view comment
Feeling threatened by thread content no doubt. I do apologize.
November 29, 2017 at 04:22
In: Philosophy in our society  — view comment
Since the point that I still never asked to rule so this is a misrepresentation of my position and has no actual bearing on this conversation and cont...
November 29, 2017 at 04:20
In: Demonstration of God's Existence I: an Aristotelian proof  — view comment
well I can't speak for you but since I am conscious of myself I can deduce that I exist at very least.
November 29, 2017 at 03:59
In: Philosophy in our society  — view comment
No, if you read the statements I've made you would see that I simply want to create jobs in logic Oh and vive la revolution!
November 29, 2017 at 03:57
In: Philosophy in our society  — view comment
There is no refutation in your statements so I won't point out the fallacies. :)
November 29, 2017 at 03:54
In: Philosophy in our society  — view comment
And my point is that philosophers should be attending those experts to adopt the logical process. Let those trained in logic use it.
November 29, 2017 at 03:51
In: Demonstration of God's Existence I: an Aristotelian proof  — view comment
The point is the logical process one can attend. Questioning reality is the foundation of philosophy...
November 29, 2017 at 03:48
In: Demonstration of God's Existence I: an Aristotelian proof  — view comment
You tell me, i dont presume to know in reality let alone in a hypothetical. Besides that's why it's an interesting proposition some entity created a v...
November 29, 2017 at 03:30
In: Philosophy in our society  — view comment
You forgot rule by idea And the mechanism for rule does matter if society is to prosper not implode.
November 29, 2017 at 03:25
In: Philosophy in our society  — view comment
A logistician used their critical thinking skills to make deductions based on information provided. They don't need to be the one working in that fiel...
November 29, 2017 at 03:24
In: Philosophy in our society  — view comment
1. Opening with an attack is a nice touch but an appeal to emotion.. 2. My point is that given the critical thinking skills of the philosophers and tr...
November 29, 2017 at 03:18
In: Demonstration of God's Existence I: an Aristotelian proof  — view comment
1- deductive fallacy. Other possibilities have been overlooked. 2-Begging the question- given the idea of 'god' is acquired knowledge, built on ideas ...
November 29, 2017 at 03:01
In: Philosophy in our society  — view comment
That reminds me of that adage about for evil men rule the world if good men do nothing. You do have a good point, though I shudder at the gross over g...
November 28, 2017 at 23:49
In: Time and such  — view comment
yeah well... The reconciliation of special and general relativity lies in relative perspective.
November 28, 2017 at 15:51
In: A question about time measurement  — view comment
Indeed someone is eating their words ;) You do realize we can't know everything I hope.. On a side note. Time is energy.
November 28, 2017 at 15:43
In: A question about time measurement  — view comment
Yeah. Was a joke about the trolling thing nevermind. Oh and you refuted your own argument and so also, invalid. And no chicken.
November 28, 2017 at 15:35
In: A question about time measurement  — view comment
Good response though :) And I think you spelled refuting wrong. No troll in it and I kinda thought the first one I replied to was trolling...but yea I...
November 28, 2017 at 15:27
In: What's Wrong With 1% Owning As Much As 99%?  — view comment
the reason it is a problem is the list of bankers you forgot to mention in that 1% who are responsible for creating a system of debt that fabricate we...
November 28, 2017 at 15:19
In: A question about time measurement  — view comment
there was no measurement but an observation. Your argument is invalid. There is no spoon.
November 28, 2017 at 14:56
In: Philosophy in our society  — view comment
Philosophers are misplaced in society because they should have been the ones to engineer the society with logic but were instead being jailed and exec...
November 28, 2017 at 14:49
In: Philosophy in our society  — view comment
I have to disagree since philosophy gave us our sciences and the whole point is that the philosophers ask the questions that direct the sciences, not ...
November 28, 2017 at 14:31
In: The actual worth of an "intellectual"  — view comment
Propinquity! One can quantify interpersonal relationships using felific calculus :)
November 28, 2017 at 14:20
⇧