Jackson

I would agree with that. Consciousness just means the way we interact with the environment.

Have you ever taken a philosophy class?

Sure. Or social constructivism.

What Hume would call convention, or custom.

I agree.

That is reasonable.

What is the objective world?

Science claims only physical particles are real. Christianity claims the spirit is real. Thus science is the outer and Christianity is the inner. A di...

"Dead" matter means it was once alive, yes?

I thing that is wrong or vague. That we have experience can be define as the subjective, but our experiences themselves are not merely subjective. My ...

Get lost.

I think they did. They had doctors. "Psychological and mental illnesses were viewed as the effect of nature on man and were treated like other disease...

I agree with that. The idea of the "hard problem" just makes a fetish out of consciousness.

Why did Aristotle and the ancient Greeks never talk about self-consciousness? Was there some huge leap in evolution where the brain developed self-con...

Yes. Notice the fruitless debate between science and religion. They need each other to protect their knowledge domains.

Good. I actually appreciate your contribution to this forum

I do not think we disagree on anything. My apology if there was offense based on my misunderstanding.

Misunderstanding. My mistake.

First person, third person. Isomorphic. Back and forth, back and forth. Each concept depends on the other.

Same metaphysics. Science needs to treat subjectivity as an opposite.

Goodbye.

I believe you are just wrong.

No, in the Physics, formal cause is "eidos" or "morphe". You are wrong that it is ousia. Ousia just means being or a thing.

I think we ran out.

Sorry, I just don't know what you're talking about anymore.

Where I am from, using wiki to debate philosophy would get you laughed out of the room.

Which is what philosophy is. One choses a specific thing to discuss.

How do you experience another person's mental activity?

Ok, close down the philosophy departments!

In the Science of Logic he criticizes the logic of Being and Nonbeing as opposites. Thus, the negation of Being is not Nonbeing but Nothingness.

Which is Chalmer's point. He wants to say there is a difference between a zombie and a human with self -consciousness.

Ancient Greeks, like Aristotle, never discussed consciousness. He talks about thought, but makes nothing of self-consciousness. Kierkegaard said Chris...

Consciousness is just thought and awareness. I think it's a fake problem.

Yes, me too.

That is confusing. I would think it is the other way around.

Okay, that is fair.

The idea of post-modern is first (to my knowledge) found in Hegel. Who often talks about the next period after the modern.

Lyotard said that. Not sure who belongs to the postmodern school.

A term by Fichte, not Hegel.

How, exactly?

Can you explain this sentence a bit more?

I have explained this. We just don't agree.

I do not see how that is a meaningful concept.

Eventually AI will make human anatomy an evolutionary dead end.

I do not need to care about the question.

I said nothing about knowledge.

No. I was asked a question and answered. And cut the ad hominem stuff.

Proof of what we were talking about.

I have lived in dangerous neighborhoods in Chicago, New York, and Los Angeles. Never carried a gun.

The Latin is wrong. By "essence" Aristotle means "form" or "shape." (eidos or morphê)