You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

PhilosophyRunner

Comments

I would agree with that.
February 15, 2023 at 01:26
Could you expand on that?
February 15, 2023 at 01:24
This is why I much prefer Kuhn's description of science over Popper. What Popper describes is what a lot of scientists would like science to be in an ...
February 14, 2023 at 20:24
Exactly. Indeed. They are not two categorically different things.
February 14, 2023 at 13:30
I think you are flitting between two similar but different systems - one with pruning of observations and one without.. Addressing the system you desc...
February 14, 2023 at 13:28
I look forward to it. I will be busy for a couple of weeks, but I will read it with interest. Incidentally, this kind of topic is the reason I got int...
January 31, 2023 at 18:30
I think 2. and 3. in your list are conditional on context. What is the end? What are the means? How much good/bad does your end achieve, in your moral...
January 31, 2023 at 15:30
Yes, and I'll be happy to read your expanded explanation. At the moment, this is what I see you doing, in order: 1. Observing what "is" through scient...
January 31, 2023 at 15:25
This is true for how the in group is treated in different societies. But many societies that thrived had no problem murdering, stealing and raping the...
January 31, 2023 at 01:42
You thought correctly. And importantly this is a testable hypothesis that has been experimentally verified.
January 31, 2023 at 01:36
There is no contradiction as they are operating in categorically different spheres. But I think you also said this, so no disagreement here. I don't t...
January 30, 2023 at 19:33
My bad I made a typo in my post. Both my points were about instrumental oughts, but I incorrectly wrote imperative oughts in my first sentence. That p...
January 30, 2023 at 18:29
Yes I agree, and that is the point I was trying to make to the other poster. The means are themselves ends. The 100 people John killed are not merely ...
January 30, 2023 at 13:55
:up:
January 30, 2023 at 13:52
My goal was good, but not sure about my subgoal...
January 30, 2023 at 03:56
Non.But we are going around the mulberry bush, so best leave it there I think.
January 30, 2023 at 03:52
Ah I see your problem. Well I gave a number of examples. John want to save one person - Mark. This is an end, do you agree? To do so he kills 100, thi...
January 30, 2023 at 03:49
No I'm asking you. Your list suggests the goal carries more weight that the sub goal. My point is why? Most of your replies have been to repeat the li...
January 30, 2023 at 03:44
Ok, so killing 100 innocent people justifies saving my daughter. (this is hypothetical - I don't have a daughter only a son. Otherwise I wouldn't feel...
January 30, 2023 at 03:40
Yes, and that is what I too am discussing. Perhaps I should simplify further. Here is a new example: I want to save 1 person - my daughter. That is my...
January 30, 2023 at 03:37
Instrumental ought are really just conditional oughts. So it doesn't solve any problems, just kicks the can down the road to the condition. And an oug...
January 30, 2023 at 03:29
Which interestingly are equal in mathematics - there are proofs for that equivalency.
January 30, 2023 at 03:17
Ok, let me refresh on Mark and John. Mark killed 500 to save 100. John saved 500 to kill 100. Since you just repeated your list, i assume that you are...
January 30, 2023 at 02:57
That is a different example though. In Mark and John's example, who is better? At best your new example would show that the list is not fixed and is c...
January 30, 2023 at 02:52
Let me expand and clarify. There is a guy called Mark. Mark really really wants to save 100 people over there. That is his goal. in order to do that h...
January 30, 2023 at 02:44
Right. Using this in your previous ordered list, and the second and third item in particular: 2. Bad subgoals, good goals 3. Good subgoals, bad goals ...
January 30, 2023 at 02:22
Could you elaborate on that?
January 30, 2023 at 02:07
Yes, but that was not my question. Rather I was arguing that killing Mr X is an end in itself. And the saving 100 people are also ends. They are all e...
January 30, 2023 at 02:05
It doesn't answer my question - are the means also ends in themselves? It seems to me means are often (perhaps even always, but I'm not sure) ends the...
January 30, 2023 at 01:59
But aren't the bad means bad ends in themselves? If I can save 100 lives by killing 1, that is good ends (saving 100 lives) with bad means (killing so...
January 30, 2023 at 01:56
This is a misunderstanding of entropy and theory of heat death of the universe. Heat death is not energy dropping to zero. There will be just the same...
January 30, 2023 at 01:51
I also see a large component of moral norms being a common framework for a group to coorporate. of course there are many different ways in which peopl...
January 19, 2023 at 14:52
I mean value in the moral and ethical way - what is good, desirable and worthwhile. Science should strive for a moral free idea in this sense, though ...
January 13, 2023 at 23:06
In this instance it was the owner of the business, who was also the CEO, who decided. He wanted to challenge the existing traditional structure of how...
January 13, 2023 at 22:08
I agree with all that. Now when now get to science, I have a view that may look at first contradictory with the above, but I don't think it is. I thin...
January 13, 2023 at 19:02
Now to say what I think should happen 1) Different people should be payed differently based on their contribution to the companies profits, but based ...
January 13, 2023 at 18:57
I don't understand your objection to "the market". An analogy - I say the electorate selected Biden as president. You say the electorate had nothing t...
January 13, 2023 at 18:33
The "market" is the total set of real people making real decisions, all whose decisions are linked to each other. Company A run by Adam will pay $55,0...
January 13, 2023 at 18:10
Yes this is how it works. The people who put int he capital, through a form of competition, decide on market value. Your market value is simply how mu...
January 13, 2023 at 17:59
Is this question in my ideal world or the current world? Taking your subsequent clarification about a Fortune 500 company, I'll assume this is a US co...
January 13, 2023 at 17:50
Indeed, and the word "progress" has values embedded in it. I think it was Collingwood who said history doesn't exist. What exist is the present and in...
January 12, 2023 at 22:29
Isn't this is dependent on the time you live, where you live, the culture around you? What is shared and validated today is not necessarily what was s...
January 12, 2023 at 21:04
Yes a non sequitur is a formal fallacy as you explain and means the logic is not valid.
January 12, 2023 at 19:16
I think that is a very big question. Here are my thoughts. There may be an external objective reality. I go further - I operate on the basis that ther...
January 12, 2023 at 19:13
I too find fallacies curious. I have wanted to make a thread on these but never had the time. There are a number formal fallacies that invalidate a lo...
January 11, 2023 at 19:30
I think you are conflating two things. We currently have many governments with conflict, persecution, economic exploitation. You want a global governm...
January 08, 2023 at 03:37
Absolutely. However there are circumstance where these external circumstances are challenging or contradictory enough that that it becomes difficult f...
January 08, 2023 at 03:00
This is largely true when everything is as it should be. However I think the OP has a point about how this functional unity can breakdown, and has bee...
January 07, 2023 at 23:33
Is this not a specific instance of a greater theme - that which exists is given moral priority over that which has the potential to exist. And hence i...
January 03, 2023 at 02:06
I see, the AI technology is not just to make enable a post-scarcity world, but to also basically run the world on behalf of humans. It would be intere...
January 03, 2023 at 01:46