Deleted User

No.

It doesn't exist. It is a projection from my brain being produced from stored memory data in the hippocampus.

No.

Yes. However, depending on how I wish to imagine this apple, it can change color, or shape, or species at will.

You're too gone, dude. That article was specifically disagreeing with you. Data comes from sensory data of the material world. That's where the corres...

But, they only appear in your brain. How is that existing outside of your brain?

Hey, you're not going to get any pushback on that from me. There's still so much that is a mystery as far as topics of this nature. It's just, when yo...

That's right. We have a disagreement. You believe thoughts are real, and I know they are imaginary. In fact, they're the definition of imaginary. Lot'...

Can I smack you in the face with an imaginary book?

They do not exist. They are data formulations produced by the brain. The brain is the source of all thoughts, which remain exclusively within the indi...

That is describing a particular philosophy, not an accurate description of the term 'reductionism' in proper usage. I am not a reductive physicalist, ...

Yes, multiple factors go into the brain being able to make the heart do its job, but it is in fact the brain doing so. Then we agree. Yes, the ENS doe...

Being: existence Thoughts don't exist, the brain does.

That's not what I said. Creatures are objects. Rational abstractions come from sensory date of the objective world. Numbers do no exists, they are hum...

Which one of these definitions do you think includes imagination?

No, my accurate description of the complex reality in question includes them as projections of a real brain that can produce abstractions from real da...

All incorrect, or irrelevant. See articles I posted for more information.

These are individual parts of the body, all of which is dependent on the regulation provided by the brain. No, the heart does not beat without the bra...

From your article: "most physicists would agree with Krauss and Tyson that observation is the only reliable source of knowledge about the natural worl...

Nope. Not what that means: reductionism: the practice of analyzing and describing a complex phenomenon in terms of phenomena that are held to represen...

That is exactly correct, you've discovered it. Bravo, you're the first. To make the case that reality is not material, or that it even has non-materia...

Yes. Yes. The brain regulates it entirely. Nothing else to it. It beats because they brain tells it to. That is, as far as is known in cognitive neuro...

If sight, or "products" of the brain cannot be separated from the brain, then yes its "products" are an element of itself. The brain is responsible fo...

And if he did, he was wrong. It didn't exist, he imagined it. A reduction would require it to be something less complex than what you're describing. T...

I said extant. That's not extant, that's imagined.

hehaha

Yep, the moment I walk up, they fall down.

This is just more of you embarrassing yourself. There is nothing true about this statement whatsoever. You have been dispensed with, guy. Move on.

You've been dispensed with, embarrassingly so, move on to something else.

I knew your pathetic attempt to fight reality would only lead you to offer up insults like a coward. Coward, another concept, much like occupying spac...

Yes, I will shoot down every fake argment you present against reality. It would be wise of you to "stick with your plan."

No, it is requisite to perform the action. Nothing to do with sufficiency.

An argument from ignorance does not negate physical reality. Not understanding how subatomic PARTICLES, that's material, operate, in absolutely no way...

The people of Hiroshima don't share your opinion, neither does science, and neither does that definition. In general does not imply conceptual, you ju...

You poor fool... I'm the only one of the two of us that has said anything scientific all day long. But, you go ahead and keep insulting me because you...

Reality is real, Janus. Not accepting the facts of science is what is dogmatic.

No, they are made by brains and interpreted by brains. That's the material realm. With their brain. Writing is a physical action, interpreting is a ph...

If you don't understand the law of identity A=A is a tautology, or that valid propositions when arranged in truth tables are tautological, you are not...

Incorrect usage is a support for your claim, and not the actual definitions of the words? Okay... Where's the irony? No, I was moving on from it becau...

All valid arguments and facts of identity are tautological in nature. It's you're first clue something is correct, or complete fabrications of the min...

Psychosomatic effects are physical. The words I'm seeing you having written are the results of physical actions on physical hardware. There is nothing...

(laughs in response to data computed by brain emoji) This is a contradictory statement. You have made a strawman for yourself. There is no subjectivel...

I'm glad to see you're understand that material reality has laws one must obey. Good to know we're making progress.

I am, indeed. Any other arguments in there? I swear you people on this website only know how to insult when your position is defeated. How do you know...

Then they are not real. Luckily, everything that happens to me has a material explanation in association with my cognition, which is produced by my br...

As in the exact same way it produces sight, smell, taste, heart beat, blood circulation, etc. Literally just like that. That's why when your brain sto...

This statement bears no relevance to what we're discussing. Asking why isn't what led them to the discovery. Figuring out how is what led to the disco...

I do not need to show to you what you are already proving you understand by typing words into your computer to send to me. It is YOU who must demonstr...

Yeah, the whole history is on Stanford: https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/neuroscience/ Okay, we'll try just defining the word, so that you can under...

Me too, pal.