You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

frank

Comments

So though you claim we should be rational about this, you've got nothing rational to say. :up:
October 10, 2024 at 22:39
You have insisted that the question be approached rationally. Your presentation includes 1. An argument that ends up being a rationale for infanticide...
October 10, 2024 at 22:29
That doesn't support your assertion that they're wrong.
October 10, 2024 at 22:11
If there are those who hold views to be in step with God, that doesn't mean their views are suspect. In fact, in both the USA and the UK, the majority...
October 10, 2024 at 21:39
You wanted to approach the question rationally and you're throwing out logical fallacies.
October 10, 2024 at 21:32
That doesn't mean they're wrong. Hey, you're the one who wanted to employ reason. :lol:
October 10, 2024 at 21:23
Cool.
October 10, 2024 at 15:10
Is this something you think should be outlawed? Or are you just expressing your sentiment?
October 10, 2024 at 15:05
And one ring to rule them all... Actually I still don't know what logical pluralism is supposed to mean. I'll continue trudging through the article.
October 09, 2024 at 22:15
But why? That's what I was asking.
October 09, 2024 at 21:57
Would you want to flesh that out?
October 09, 2024 at 21:52
:up: :up:
October 09, 2024 at 19:59
The first objection is what passed through my mind as I was reading the definition of pluralism: "One way to object to logical pluralism via cases is ...
October 09, 2024 at 17:03
I went through the argument(s) for pluralism and it made no sense to me. It seemed the proponents are already using alternate logic, so my strategy is...
October 09, 2024 at 16:55
But you don't favor legislating it, right?
October 09, 2024 at 15:52
But abortion is much older than you might think. Native American women knew which plants would bring about abortion. Anti-abortion is more a Christian...
October 09, 2024 at 14:34
The Russell article was over my head, and the PhilosophyNow article didn't have enough meat, so I'm going with the SEP article on logical pluralism. F...
October 09, 2024 at 13:56
:up: :up:
October 09, 2024 at 02:39
I wasn't just talking about you. The pro-choice spokesperson said abortion is not a matter of morality, it's about the right to choose. No, if someone...
October 09, 2024 at 02:04
Very much so. Your own morality isn't based on arguments. It comes from the way you feel. No. I'm pointing out that you're building arguments that no ...
October 09, 2024 at 01:48
What you're referring to as the "wider picture" is basically logic. How does logic have any force for you if you're a logical pluralist?
October 09, 2024 at 01:28
He's infuriating. It's by design.
October 09, 2024 at 00:49
That's important to you. I get it. My attitude about it comes from an event where I was listening to a pro-choice spokesperson and it struck me that s...
October 09, 2024 at 00:48
Victor Frankl said that you can't compare one person's pain to another's. The pain in any being takes up all the available space. The preference angle...
October 09, 2024 at 00:02
:up: mañana
October 08, 2024 at 23:54
You know only part of the blastocyst becomes a fetus. The rest is a protective covering and the placenta.
October 08, 2024 at 23:36
Right. The preferences-angle is BS. People decide for their own reasons.
October 08, 2024 at 23:31
Why not?
October 08, 2024 at 23:28
That was in the PhilosophyNow article. We could do a read through. Russell mentioned that logical nihilists don't tend to measure up to the name. They...
October 08, 2024 at 23:27
All life demonstrates preferences.
October 08, 2024 at 23:24
That's just the first example given of shooting down so-called laws of logic in G Russell's article.. The PhilosophyNow article focuses on what strike...
October 08, 2024 at 22:59
It just comes down to power. Where abortion is illegal, there are few doctors who will do it because they don't want to be punished. If you want abort...
October 08, 2024 at 21:38
And that worked out really well for the Jews.
October 08, 2024 at 17:13
okey dokey
October 08, 2024 at 16:06
I feel so refreshed. Where's the paypal button?
October 08, 2024 at 15:14
@"Banno"Quick question: It looks like logical nihilism is going to hinge on the Liar. It's supposed to be violating the LONC? I haven't seen other exa...
October 08, 2024 at 14:21
That's true. This is why they use computer models to discover anthropogenic climate change. Pointing to today's weather is not the way to convince non...
October 08, 2024 at 13:40
yep
October 07, 2024 at 23:24
With that guy, I'll note that at time 1, he's opposed to x, while being as insulting as possible at time 2, he's in favor of x, while being as insulti...
October 07, 2024 at 22:57
That may be true, but Frege was interested in thoughts. I think comparing and contrasting him to Wittgenstein would be a cool way to examine that. Tha...
October 07, 2024 at 22:37
sock puppet?
October 07, 2024 at 22:32
Why not focus on the topic rather than on psychoanalysis?
October 07, 2024 at 21:40
The last time I was in Las Vegas it was 52 C. So what? I haven't heard anyone to talking about Kuwait. :razz:
October 07, 2024 at 20:52
Why did you bring up Kuwait?
October 07, 2024 at 20:24
:cool:
October 07, 2024 at 19:15
Leontiskos is the guy who was just a few days ago forcefully insisting that Frege did not philosophize in terms of thoughts. Then he said maybe Frege ...
October 07, 2024 at 18:36
The coolest results I get from using AI (I use Wonder) come from giving it an image to start with. If I wanted a three story building, I'd give it an ...
October 07, 2024 at 18:33
She's not a mod anymore.
October 07, 2024 at 15:50
See the SEP article on states of affairs. "Thoughts can be the contents of propositional attitudes. When one says “There are three things that everyon...
October 07, 2024 at 14:02
I live in a capitalist society, so that's something that money settles. Some rappers are billionaires, right?
October 06, 2024 at 23:57