You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

frank

Comments

Ontological anti-realism is just some level of skepticism about ontology in general.
February 23, 2021 at 20:41
So you're a soft ontological anti-realist, which means you don't put much stock in metaphysics. Reality, or whatever may be the case, impresses itself...
February 23, 2021 at 18:08
I agree that introducing jargon should only be done when there's a really good reason for it.
February 23, 2021 at 13:11
Experience with mandatory diversity training, yes. My co-workers and I had reason to use the training with respect to a person in our care. They had v...
February 23, 2021 at 13:08
Playing chess would be analogous to using language? If using language by yourself is a social construct, then all language use is socially constructed...
February 23, 2021 at 13:00
That's fine. I had a feeling you wouldn't be able to answer. I think Mww will say whether he thinks reality is a social construct.
February 23, 2021 at 02:59
Gender fluid people want to be talked about using the plural pronoun, and at the same time, using "they" is being used to replace "he or she", as you ...
February 23, 2021 at 02:28
There have been a few cases of feral children. In some cases they never learn to speak. If private speech is primary, you'd expect them be able to ada...
February 23, 2021 at 01:15
Interesting. So would you argue that the set of things we declare to be real is largely produced intersubjectively and has the stamp of culture on it?...
February 22, 2021 at 21:39
Probably because it's not saying much more than that language, like individuality, requires a social setting as a launch pad and touchstone. So what?
February 22, 2021 at 21:04
Point is, your private language would be built off work done by others, so it wouldn't really be your own personal thing. If you were feral, I don't t...
February 22, 2021 at 20:35
Maybe no one in this thread is actually talking about the PLA. We're just talking about subjectivity. If I tried to make a personal language (so we di...
February 22, 2021 at 18:16
Could you help me understand this? Isn't it drawing on common sense? Does "private" mean untranslatable even in principle? That's a thumbs up, right?
February 22, 2021 at 17:28
True. What's the PLA's take-away? It's not actually an argument. It's just a handfull of reckons. It suggests that linguistic structure is reinforced ...
February 22, 2021 at 15:36
Face recognition is innate. Dogs have forward facing eyes like a human, so dogs should be stand out to babies.
February 22, 2021 at 14:23
Locked in. Your speech production center is separate from your sound interpretation area. You can talk to yourself.
February 22, 2021 at 14:18
But think about someone who's locked-in (they're conscious, but can't signal out in any way). The language of their thoughts isn't native to them orig...
February 22, 2021 at 00:21
This is Meno's paradox. Plato uses it to show that some knowledge is innate (that's one way to put it).
February 21, 2021 at 22:26
A mutation could happen to a dominant gene or a recessive gene. Either way, the mutant doesn't have to mate with a fellow mutant to pass on the change...
February 21, 2021 at 22:15
No. Visit your local emergency room. If you think you're feeling the pain of the patients, you're deluded.
February 21, 2021 at 20:31
Public and private are two sides to the same coin. Can't have one without the other.
February 21, 2021 at 14:19
What ontology are you expressing? How does the statement differ from a grammatical fact so that it's ontological?
February 21, 2021 at 01:27
The logic was: it's a yellow cup, hence there exists a yellow cup. Seven is a prime number, hence there exists a number 7. Same thing.
February 21, 2021 at 00:48
Ok. But then, the same logic applies to seven. That sounds like some sort of zen mantra. Is there an ontological commitment behind it?
February 20, 2021 at 23:35
I think we agree that we have no truth-apt ontological statements to make about either cups or numbers. As for sharing ideas amongst ourselves, we hav...
February 20, 2021 at 23:21
So is wearing pants. True. The vague universal is just one example of how we can't do without talk of concepts and notions. That doesn't imply anythin...
February 20, 2021 at 23:05
I was hoping you'd take the stance that we can do without talk of concepts, ideas, and notions. If we think of universals as an aspect of investigatio...
February 20, 2021 at 14:34
Yes, but the notion of a coffee cup doesn't. The notion of a coffee cup might be part of an inquiry. You see an object on the table, but the lights ar...
February 19, 2021 at 22:18
Notions aren't the sorts of things that have locations.
February 19, 2021 at 21:58
I think you've turned your brain into a pressure cooker.
February 19, 2021 at 21:57
My neighbor has unruly sons who do stupid things. One of them bashed his car into my mailbox, and its concrete anchored 4x4 tore up the front of his c...
February 19, 2021 at 16:16
Aw shucks. :blush:
February 18, 2021 at 21:11
Strangely enough, that makes for good conversations. :chin:
February 18, 2021 at 20:40
Twinings makes a tea called "Soothe". Check it out.
February 18, 2021 at 20:24
Don't you occasionally grant that there's ineffable stuff?
February 18, 2021 at 20:19
Primacy?
February 18, 2021 at 20:14
I think most normal people assume both. You demonstrate that you assume you can know what people think by asking questions. You don't act like you can...
February 17, 2021 at 02:11
It's assumed. You make this assumption regularly, that you know how others feel or what they think.
February 17, 2021 at 01:40
Yep. Treat others as you want to be treated.
February 16, 2021 at 23:48
Math is also not dependent on being shared. Would you call it objective?
February 16, 2021 at 23:46
Just kidding
February 16, 2021 at 19:44
That wasn't very compassionate of you.
February 16, 2021 at 19:27
Let's call that Compassion A. It has to do with awareness and doing the right thing relative to correctly perceived issues. This is not the Dalai Lama...
February 16, 2021 at 18:56
Sort of.
February 16, 2021 at 18:12
You can't have compassion for yourself?
February 16, 2021 at 16:22
You might enjoy The Reign of Wolf 21
February 16, 2021 at 16:02
Maybe you could get a compass out of it for your great sailing adventures. Remember, Schopenhauer was a determinist. He saw compassion as springing na...
February 16, 2021 at 13:13
People just assume that we all have the same kind of subjective experience. This assumption is essential to morality, and seems to hold up to some ext...
February 16, 2021 at 12:40
Is it recyclable?
February 15, 2021 at 19:35
:up:
February 15, 2021 at 13:34