You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

S

Comments

Oh yeah, I've just seen this: NBC News - Poll: The Popular Candidates Aren't the Ones Leading the Pack. How'd that work out? Doesn't seen very democra...
April 27, 2016 at 19:21
What you're calling an "idea" isn't an idea in the ordinary or Humean sense. Which raises the question of what you call an actual idea. If you have it...
April 27, 2016 at 18:42
How does this relate back to my comment? I didn't say that Hume's theory of perception - more specifically, The Copy Principle - is without shortcomin...
April 27, 2016 at 10:51
If you don't remember, then I suggest you go back through the discussion. I know what quoting out of context means, and I stand by my charge and its a...
April 27, 2016 at 09:21
Clinton, more as an anti-Trump tactic than anything else. I'd vote for Bernie if I could. I don't know anything about this Kasich guy. Is he less evil...
April 26, 2016 at 13:09
Well, similar dubious and unpopular trade deals have been prevented from going ahead in the past, so there's a likelihood that history will repeat its...
April 26, 2016 at 09:35
If you're referring to the fact that I haven't yet replied to your posts, then I'm sorry it seems that way. I was planning on getting around to it, al...
April 26, 2016 at 09:29
Indeed, it doesn't. You can cherry pick and so can I, and this has got us nowhere fast.
April 25, 2016 at 21:21
Thanks for the links, but that isn't doing what I said. You've not shown that they meet the conditions I spoke of. Do you expect me to do the work for...
April 25, 2016 at 20:50
Ok, Shia LeBeouf.
April 25, 2016 at 15:07
That's todays quote from my calendar of Shakespearean insults.
April 23, 2016 at 22:19
No, it's not a red herring at all. It's a fitting assessment. It's not in the least bit plausible that you could have overlooked my arguments against ...
April 23, 2016 at 21:22
What a remarkable display of wilful ignorance.
April 23, 2016 at 18:39
Don't you remember my earlier comments rejecting precisely this notion that you brought up? I compared it to a production line in a factory. No, I cer...
April 23, 2016 at 13:42
Correct. It's part of one that you've taken out of context. Well fucking done. You're making some assumptions about my position that might constitute ...
April 23, 2016 at 13:29
Oh, don't be so Victorian! What's the harm in a little dog fucking?
April 21, 2016 at 18:51
Again with the exaggeration and appeals to emotion. Oh noes! Chaos, strife, pain, suffering, misery, deprivation, disaster! Yep, that's a fair way to ...
April 21, 2016 at 18:38
The "most" part is arguable, but even if true, it's cherry picked and its significance exaggerated. It only seems that way to some, and it seems other...
April 21, 2016 at 18:07
No. Firstly, it's not about whether some people will or won't be dissuaded. It's about whether they should or shouldn't be. But it's about more than j...
April 21, 2016 at 17:32
Then, again, you're not talking about instrumentality, but rather, judging by the rest of your post and by other posts of yours, a particular emotiona...
April 21, 2016 at 13:40
Okay, we're all dog fuckers, then: both men and women. And children too, because what the hey, we're already depraved beyond redemption. Better? ;)
April 21, 2016 at 13:16
I know that more than consent would be required. I was just expressing my approval, or rather indifference, to such things occurring or being permitte...
April 21, 2016 at 13:02
Then please go ahead and do so, or link to a post in which you think you've done so. But remember that for your argument to be strong enough to stand ...
April 21, 2016 at 12:25
Brilliant. Where's that from? Edit: Ah, Life of Brian. It has been too long.
April 20, 2016 at 13:23
Especially when it overlooks me. It's all about me, you see.
April 20, 2016 at 13:21
Sure, but within reason. I don't have any objections to the examples you gave. There is an implication - whether intended or otherwise - in the way in...
April 20, 2016 at 13:16
Well, that depends on what you mean by "god". If so, then I agree. But as an atheist, I tend to leave the squabbling over what properties or plans God...
April 20, 2016 at 12:10
No need for that, either. What do you think this is? Some sort of "Jokebox"? START SHOUTING OR GTFO!!!!
April 20, 2016 at 11:55
Typical. My comments never get picked, but flawed comments like the one that you quoted do. I suppose it does have a ring to it, if you think that tha...
April 20, 2016 at 11:47
That's nonsense, since it fails to account for at least two very important factors: capacity and consequence. Firstly, if someone is not capable of li...
April 20, 2016 at 11:43
Oh no, we're in agreement again. Is this a cause for concern?
April 20, 2016 at 11:25
If you're suggesting that I've committed a fallacious appeal to the majority, then you're mistaken. What I was getting at is that the testimony of all...
April 20, 2016 at 10:22
If you mean simply that there are countless means and ends in life, and that once one ends, another inevitably arises, then yes, that is true. But I d...
April 20, 2016 at 09:03
If God exists, he exists in a world that is pretty absurd. So that rules out the existence of a certain kind of God. It would definitely rule out any ...
April 19, 2016 at 22:19
No, but if they express such a desire, and someone is willing, then I don't think that there's anything wrong with that. And no, sex isn't necessary.
April 19, 2016 at 21:36
No need.
April 19, 2016 at 21:17
Pizza, never shower again, 14-ish, nowhere (except on Facebook, but we don't ever talk). What's my result? Serial killer, again?
April 19, 2016 at 20:02
You can use that same reasoning to argue that we should let other people have children, and let those children live their lives unaffected by the acti...
April 18, 2016 at 22:58
I'm glad that you acknowledge the subjectivity of it, but I suspect that you go further than I would with the appropriation part. I would say that som...
April 18, 2016 at 21:35
I don't agree with that second paragraph if you're suggesting that it's necessarily true and/or true of every case and would (or would likely) be true...
April 18, 2016 at 20:58
It's quite simple, really. In a hypothetical future scenario, someone is born and experiences valuable things out of life. This scenario can become an...
April 18, 2016 at 20:34
I didn't. I said "IF such-and-such and bla-de-bla" because I'm tired of repeating myself. You've predictably filled that part in however you like, rat...
April 18, 2016 at 20:24
I can sympathise. That's how I feel when arguing against you.
April 18, 2016 at 20:13
Yes, but that's obviously not the condition - or not the only condition - I had in mind, so your reply is either an ignoratio elenchi or a straw man. ...
April 18, 2016 at 20:09
OKAY! SPEAK UP, THEN!
April 18, 2016 at 19:53
*Bites hand*
April 18, 2016 at 19:52
Gotta get back to work. I'm late now. :D
April 18, 2016 at 17:29
Woof woof.
April 18, 2016 at 17:29
No, it isn't. On the contrary, the opposite is irrational. It's rational to make a claim that can demonstrably be justified. Whether or not one choose...
April 18, 2016 at 17:26
That's not entirely true. Anyway, I think a debate/discussion about the Humean points I raised in response to some of your claims would be worth pursu...
April 18, 2016 at 17:18