You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

S

Comments

I can guarantee you that there is no racial discrimination in the legislation, so your problem must be with how it's used in practice. So argue for re...
June 23, 2016 at 15:22
If a disproportionate number of those listed are Muslim, and that is a problem, then argue for reform. If even one of those people listed carries out ...
June 23, 2016 at 15:03
I haven't called you a fascist! It makes you anti-democratic to an extent, and unjustifiably so in my view.
June 23, 2016 at 14:50
I said that it effectively will be. Meaning that it will be treated as such by the government. Do you disagree? I thought you were a pragmatist, yet y...
June 23, 2016 at 14:47
It means accepting it as binding and authoritative, rather than a meaningless pretence which can easily be overturned. That's effectively what it's go...
June 23, 2016 at 14:42
I took too long to reply, and you beat me to the punch. :-|
June 23, 2016 at 14:32
No, it's not about what you should want, it's about what you ought to accept, regardless of what you want. You ought to accept the results, and not fa...
June 23, 2016 at 14:31
It's not as black-and-white and you're trying to make it appear, though. Being in favor of overturning the results of this referendum is not justifiab...
June 23, 2016 at 14:16
The problem with that analogy being the massive difference in degree. Leaving the EU isn't comparable to slavery, patriarchy, etc.
June 23, 2016 at 14:09
I thought that that's what you were referring to. I think that I must have misinterpreted Michael's comments initially. Now I understand where you're ...
June 23, 2016 at 14:05
Thanks. I just read some of the Guardian article. I find the views expressed there to be irritating. In my view, it's linking two very important issue...
June 23, 2016 at 13:49
But what are you basing this on? Are you taking something that Michael has said as an example? From my point of view, it just looks like hyperbole.
June 23, 2016 at 13:21
It can indeed be more complex, but it need not exclusively be about personal subjectivity, as indicated by the statement 'I disapprove of X'; it can a...
June 23, 2016 at 13:14
I'm obviously defending some of the benefits of remaining a member of the European Union. Grow some serious criticism! (Emotional nationalist cries, l...
June 23, 2016 at 11:58
Then we'd no longer be bound to those EU laws which are beneficial, and which the Tories (the current government) do not seem keen to replace. Hurrah.
June 22, 2016 at 12:17
Well, it's shocking for a number of reasons, and if it isn't, then it should be. Otherwise the status quo will be strengthened, since perceived normal...
June 21, 2016 at 23:03
My diagnoses for the two reasons you stated are, respectively, wrong priorities and corruption. Then there is the failure of cross-party cooperation. ...
June 21, 2016 at 15:13
No, actually it doesn't. I think that you've misunderstood the point that you addressed. I wasn't talking about any particular moral issues, or indica...
June 14, 2016 at 15:15
One day closer to death.
June 14, 2016 at 14:59
I turned twenty-eight years old last Saturday.
June 14, 2016 at 09:07
Thanks for all of the birthday wishes.
June 13, 2016 at 13:53
I share your views about thinking of morality and moral behaviour and psychology in abstract and rational terms. We typically and primarily relate to ...
June 10, 2016 at 10:37
I can't relate very much with your position, but I suppose it's much like the position of an atheist with regards to many philosophy of religion discu...
June 08, 2016 at 23:14
I was wondering why I didn't remember you, so I looked into it, and I discovered that you were known as BalanceofEquilibrium. I remember you.
June 08, 2016 at 11:26
It's funny that you chose to focus on terrorism: the one example which has exceptions, as I indicated. Although there are also many examples in which ...
June 08, 2016 at 11:04
@"Agustino" Told ya so.
June 04, 2016 at 22:51
No, again, that's the goverment, rather than the people. None of the examples that you've provided are typically directed against the people, with the...
June 04, 2016 at 12:59
So it would seem. A couple of my younger workmates recently told me that I came across as annoyed in a message that I sent because I used "those dots"...
June 04, 2016 at 02:21
Evidence?
June 04, 2016 at 01:49
Ah, those good old days of schadenfreude. Hanover, you do remind me of Gerald. Remember him? I was discussing this with my cat, but just when I though...
June 04, 2016 at 01:37
But that is no fact. The laws are enacted and formulated by the will of some people - not all people - and, in some cases, not even a majority, or eve...
June 01, 2016 at 09:30
Hi, and welcome.
June 01, 2016 at 08:36
I've just noticed that @"angslan" joined. Welcome, angslan. :)
June 01, 2016 at 08:34
Does it? It makes me think of Kant, but it seems quite far removed from Plato. Also, in what way do you think a priori "know-how" knowledge is involve...
May 31, 2016 at 20:42
Welcome. You need more than 60 posts per 24 hours?!
May 31, 2016 at 15:31
It can do. One can state agreement that there is a cup, even if one doesn't believe that there is a cup, and even if there isn't a cup. There are many...
May 24, 2016 at 23:50
Exactly.
May 24, 2016 at 23:16
Yes, but my point was that some components of complex desires are incapable of being comprehended by other, less advanced species, so such desires can...
May 24, 2016 at 23:13
Yes, that sort of thing is largely speculation, but I reckon he's right about other species lacking the desire to change sex. But even if so, he's sti...
May 24, 2016 at 22:45
Again, this is laughably fallacious. They don't display a desire to become armchair philosophers either.
May 24, 2016 at 22:36
It's laughable because it's a blatant category error. You can't compare the occurence of such a phenomenon to species insufficiently advanced for it t...
May 24, 2016 at 22:33
Hilarious! You've got me there. I know from first hand experience, because, as part of a study, I've been observing the behaviour of sharks, and for y...
May 24, 2016 at 22:10
I've not looked into it, but I trust you conducted your research impartially with no hidden agenda.
May 24, 2016 at 22:07
Lol. What other being is capable of doing so?
May 24, 2016 at 22:04
Now there's a surprise. Well, maybe you should actually meet some of these people. I assure you, there are plenty of them who are indeed living a bett...
May 24, 2016 at 22:03
Well, you shouldn't be trying to do so in those cases where it'll prevent them from living a better life, because you'll be doing more harm than good....
May 24, 2016 at 21:58
Or, to be more precise, out of those people who don't outright reject it, a smaller, but still significant and relatively large number of people accep...
May 24, 2016 at 21:43
Ok, if you're going to be pendantic, then they accept it.
May 24, 2016 at 21:34
You might not think so, but they do. They don't outright reject the concept of gender identity being determined by means other than what you're born w...
May 24, 2016 at 21:31