You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

S

Comments

Maybe. Though not the U.S., of course.
September 05, 2019 at 20:02
Okay, Canada should be more like the U.K., with the possible exception of the case of the comedian who went to jail for teaching his dog to do a Nazi ...
September 05, 2019 at 19:57
The U.K. is a member of the U.N. We're a founding member. So you must be cherry picking, instead of giving a full picture. Hate speech is obviously an...
September 05, 2019 at 19:51
Okay, so Canada should be more like the U.K. :up:
September 05, 2019 at 19:42
Yes, you're absolutely right. It irritates me when people do that. Do you think that they think that they're being clever or inventive?
September 05, 2019 at 19:34
I can't take you seriously at all, either, because you say things like this: And this: And this: And this:
September 05, 2019 at 19:30
In: Brexit  — view comment
I agree with Boris. I'd rather him dead in a ditch than seek an extension from Brussels.
September 05, 2019 at 19:06
In: Brexit  — view comment
I have to admit, the cover of The Sun (Corbyn-chicken) is hilarious.
September 05, 2019 at 17:17
Only when it is ceded in excess. I don't believe that restrictions on hate speech are an excessive restriction on the freedom of expression. It's too ...
September 05, 2019 at 17:13
I'm not insulting you, I'm just given you honest criticism about your expressed thoughts, and apparently you don't like that. You're actually the one ...
September 05, 2019 at 16:39
I wholeheartedly agree.
September 05, 2019 at 16:36
It's not normative. It's obviously just the default. That's why it makes sense to say that a cat isn't a giraffe. If you interpret it that way, then y...
September 05, 2019 at 16:18
That's implicit in saying that this or that interpretation is right or wrong. Your earlier interpretation was wrong. It's true to say that it's a fact...
September 05, 2019 at 15:28
No, exceptions include explaining how language works.
September 05, 2019 at 15:19
You're expressing your thoughts and so am I. That's what we do here. It goes without saying. And my thoughts are that your thoughts on this topic are ...
September 05, 2019 at 15:07
It's irrelevant when it commits the fallacy of appealing to the masses and not otherwise. The exceptions have been explained to you. As far as I'm awa...
September 05, 2019 at 14:55
So I haven't said otherwise. At least not without qualification. It's not irrelevant, it's just ineffectual against people who block out reason.
September 05, 2019 at 14:15
In cases where the crowd is right, like the case under discussion regarding hate speech, why wouldn't I go along with them? I'd be a fool not to. Your...
September 05, 2019 at 13:49
I'm a moral relativist in ethics. I'd say that there are correct judgements relative to whatever, whether that be a consensus, an individual, whatever...
September 05, 2019 at 13:45
I don't know about you, but I want to be understood, and you seem to be deliberately and childishly putting obstacles in the way just to make a point.
September 05, 2019 at 13:31
Yes, there are. Surely you're capable of figuring out the appropriate context in which it is true to say that there's a right interpretation. Try hard...
September 05, 2019 at 12:23
Yes there are. That's absurd.
September 05, 2019 at 12:05
It is if you interpret it right.
September 05, 2019 at 12:02
That's the problem, then. It's a problem to do with your poor judgement. You're like the 1 + 1 = 3 guy. Not only are you wrong, you're overconfident a...
September 05, 2019 at 11:59
We don't speak Terrapinese, only you do. In ordinary language, it is true to say that there are facts about whether something is a benefit. You're jus...
September 05, 2019 at 11:53
So, if you were the 1 + 1 = 3 guy, you wouldn't care, so long as, in your assessment, you're meeting your own goals?
September 05, 2019 at 11:44
A mental gym? Well, it isn't working. If I went to a maths forum claiming that 1 + 1 = 3, and I was reasonable, then my view would change to 1 + 1 = 2...
September 05, 2019 at 11:40
The conclusion that it's not a fact that such-and-such is a benefit is unacceptable, so you're making your own reduction to the absurd there. The obvi...
September 05, 2019 at 11:25
The purpose of pointing out that your opinion won't matter? Well, why do you bother to come here? Just to do the equivalent of declaring that you thin...
September 05, 2019 at 11:12
We don't have a burden to constantly satisfy your unreasonable doubts and denials. Why should we care what car-giraffe guy thinks?
September 05, 2019 at 09:26
It just means that you'll disagree, while the rest of us agree, and your disagreement won't really matter in the bigger picture, just like car-giraffe...
September 05, 2019 at 09:15
Yeah, if that's what he meant. People speak that way all of the time. People call a "car" what's generally considered to be a car, as in that metal th...
September 05, 2019 at 09:12
You know that you could interpret that statement more charitably, right? There are facts about what's generally considered a benefit. That's what he m...
September 05, 2019 at 09:03
Oh god. Who let him in?
September 05, 2019 at 08:59
Well, yeah, it will say "may" because it's not a sure thing. Would you expect it to be any different? And yeah, as the analysis states, it isn't easy ...
September 05, 2019 at 07:43
Just doing a little research.
September 05, 2019 at 01:34
I'm not the least bit interested in what you have to say on the matter.
September 04, 2019 at 23:58
I can't put a number to it, and I don't need to. I'm not going to guess. All that matters is that measures are in place to prevent potential terrorist...
September 04, 2019 at 23:53
No. Too many people try to be novel and poetic, but it just doesn't work. It might be boring, but examples of workable descriptions are the ones that ...
September 04, 2019 at 22:18
Sounds like you have too much of a conscience.
September 04, 2019 at 22:08
Yes, otherwise it's just a redundant label, and it would fail to distinguish theism from atheism. That I believe that the universe exists does not imp...
September 04, 2019 at 22:02
This I would classify as the worst kind of response to the question. Vague, unconventional, subjective, arbitrary, renders theism indistinguishable fr...
September 04, 2019 at 21:55
It's probably a pipe dream, especially here of all places. But you might get some or even general agreement on some key aspects. It'll have to be acce...
September 04, 2019 at 21:36
That sounds boring. I think I'd rather you were mean every once in a while. That would then make you human. I prefer humans to empty shells with prist...
September 04, 2019 at 21:05
What counts as an acceptable risk would include risks that are out of our control, risks that are too impractical to act upon, risks which are conside...
September 04, 2019 at 20:50
Poking fun at someone can be mean. I never suggested that it always is, and I never suggested that it's the same as being mean. It's just one form amo...
September 04, 2019 at 20:39
Yeah, that'd be a great analogy, if slavery and the average life were even remotely alike. The rest of your post is just more of the usual deliberatel...
September 04, 2019 at 20:29
It had some great moments, like the rare clapping across the opposition benches in response to an MP calling for an apology for Boris's remarks about ...
September 04, 2019 at 20:23
In: Brexit  — view comment
Jeremy Corbyn had a strong showing in PMQ's, I thought.
September 04, 2019 at 19:51
It can be, yeah, so long as you don't go overboard. There's a difference between, say, poking fun at someone and stabbing them in the liver.
September 04, 2019 at 18:36