You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

S

Comments

*your
March 21, 2018 at 14:23
You know you can edit you're comments, right?
March 21, 2018 at 14:23
Baden is a book-headed Hanover of a smashed potato.
March 21, 2018 at 14:20
That's a book-headed idea.
March 21, 2018 at 14:17
If it comes with the old man, not sure I want it. Unless... he "fell" off the speedboat and got "lost" at sea.
March 21, 2018 at 14:09
Really? Moments like these make the American presidential candidate debates worth watching: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=AE2t_6aMcF8 And there's more...
March 21, 2018 at 14:07
I don't know if I'll ever be able to hear the phrase "knew exactly what he was doing" and not be reminded of Marco Roboto's epic glitch.
March 21, 2018 at 13:48
There it is! :grin:
March 21, 2018 at 13:41
Actually.
March 21, 2018 at 13:40
A riddle! Is it an escalator?
March 21, 2018 at 13:39
Hmm, okay... Mods tinkering with the filter has now effected one of my replies. Interesting. No big deal though.
March 21, 2018 at 13:31
Test.
March 21, 2018 at 13:30
No, it's both. You can't truly understand or learn about what is good and what is bad without that vital emotional connection. It would be like trying...
March 21, 2018 at 02:48
A moral dilemma is an ethical situation. At least in accordance with my use of those terms. And I doubt that I'm alone in using them that way. In fact...
March 21, 2018 at 02:27
Like you do, only my definition is more broad. We've literally just been over this. I think a more encompassing definition works better than one such ...
March 21, 2018 at 02:08
:roll: Any moral dilemma comes under the umbrella of ethics. Your question doesn't really make sense, or the answer is obvious, or you're making some ...
March 21, 2018 at 01:40
Not bad.
March 21, 2018 at 01:17
Maybe that's because of your preconceptions about what morality and ethics are. But I don't know. I'm not a mind reader. Ethics deals with morality an...
March 21, 2018 at 01:13
I won't endeavour to correct you on that one.
March 21, 2018 at 01:02
Of course through morality; or rather, through moral judgement. Emotions are essential, and diminished emotional processing or reactivity, as in, for ...
March 21, 2018 at 00:53
You want me to educate you on what you already know, but deny to save face? I don't believe for a second that you're ignorant of the relationship betw...
March 21, 2018 at 00:00
What an absurd thing to say.
March 20, 2018 at 23:56
Maybe if you do this: :grin: And then gradually disappear, leaving only your grin.
March 20, 2018 at 23:19
Your crying won't affect him. He's stony-faced.
March 20, 2018 at 23:06
You know what would make it fun? Do it, but do it Moses-style. :lol: :up:
March 20, 2018 at 22:54
Well, you should be, because I'm fucking nuts, but that's beside the point.
March 20, 2018 at 22:34
So many gems! https://philosophiaetveritas.wordpress.com/2018/01/21/the-actual-conversation-occurred-in-december-2017/ :rofl:
March 20, 2018 at 22:24
I disagree. I think it's just his humour. It's what's known as anti-humour, I think. It's not supposed to make sense. I could easily create a blog lik...
March 20, 2018 at 22:22
https://philosophiaetveritas.wordpress.com/2018/03/07/some-attitude-of-bill-clinton/
March 20, 2018 at 22:19
It would take a lot to dissuade me from my belief that he's just an amusing troll, although I have yet to delve deeply into the gold mine that is his ...
March 20, 2018 at 22:06
Nah, he's just a troll, and he's trolled you.
March 20, 2018 at 22:01
Yes. Yes. Nah. Pushover. Hansom guy. :lol:
March 20, 2018 at 21:36
:rofl: :rofl: :rofl: I want him to say something about me! I wonder if he has said anything about me... :chin:
March 20, 2018 at 21:30
Yes, moar! :lol:
March 20, 2018 at 19:23
No sense of humour. :roll:
March 20, 2018 at 19:21
Lmao! Love that guy. The thing called 'darthbarracuda' has a troll.
March 20, 2018 at 19:19
:rofl:
March 20, 2018 at 19:07
No, I have the gall to talk about you in plain sight. :grin: In the context of ethics, it's the opposite.
March 20, 2018 at 11:00
Yes. Is that really worth debating?
March 20, 2018 at 10:35
Maybe, but from my perspective, it'd be much harder to actually believe it.
March 20, 2018 at 10:33
That may be interesting. In that case, I think the greater burden would rest with you. As for myself, I find the amount of work required to seriously ...
March 19, 2018 at 20:39
It's not all about risk. It comes down to a cost-benefit analysis, and, in my assessment, the costs significantly outweigh the benefits. Some risks ar...
March 19, 2018 at 19:29
It's not a fallacy to condemn a bad attitude towards an issue indicated by a statement made in the context of an ethical discussion about that very is...
March 19, 2018 at 18:50
Such a blasé attitude to a deadly serious issue. There's no "maybe" about it. There's no "who knows". A metaphorical shrugging of the shoulders simply...
March 18, 2018 at 23:27
I kind of don't really get it. There's already a field known as animal cognition. It has a history, a method, a vast amount of research has been condu...
March 18, 2018 at 23:07
My word of the day - or perhaps even the year - would be: "wat". As in: If one examines semanticist capitalism, one is faced with a choice: either rej...
March 18, 2018 at 22:40
The Second Amendment, not the Two-Dimensional Amendment. And yes, I don't need to be reminded of the unfortunate fact that it forms a part of the Cons...
March 18, 2018 at 21:52
Opportunity missed. :sad: (Obviously should've replied with "Is a false statement").
March 18, 2018 at 21:25
If this is what you're getting at in relation to different classes of guns, then I agree. But that doesn't change the bottom line, which is the genera...
March 18, 2018 at 20:31