You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

S

Comments

Compared to my arse.
January 12, 2019 at 22:21
Yes, I know you're impressed. You'll have to come over for dinner some time and we can discuss it further. I'll provide the main course and you can br...
January 12, 2019 at 22:10
Speaking of Protestant Europe, do you remember when it went to war with Catholic Europe? I wonder what that was about. I seem to remember reading some...
January 12, 2019 at 21:49
Alright then, how about the 918 people who died after drinking poison in the Jonestown Massacre, some of whom were forced? Or was that badly reported ...
January 12, 2019 at 21:16
Maybe not everything, but let's not forget that Socrates was literally made to drink poison as a result of being charged with impiety and corruption o...
January 12, 2019 at 20:43
You must be new.
January 12, 2019 at 20:17
The not-so-wise ape.
January 12, 2019 at 19:54
It's alright, I understand. We all have our coping mechanisms.
January 12, 2019 at 19:44
You say that from a position of privilege. In another place or time, you probably wouldn't be so fortunate. And this privilege didn't come out of nowh...
January 12, 2019 at 19:36
Good point. You know, I almost added, "especially for a philosophy enthusiast", but then I remembered that, in some ways, philosophy is a parody of it...
January 12, 2019 at 19:04
And there it is again. Never mind? Have a nice day? I've waded in to waters too deep?
January 12, 2019 at 18:58
Indeed. It's beyond belief that some people actually think of faith in that way. The lengths that some people will go to in order to rationalise the i...
January 12, 2019 at 18:53
Party B is wrong. You can't know anything by faith. Faith is a means of achieving peace of mind, not a means of obtaining knowledge. If you want truth...
January 12, 2019 at 18:40
Yes. What now seems like a curious phenomenon might have helped us outcompete other species in the past. Theism and other such beliefs might be a quir...
January 12, 2019 at 18:32
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-46846467 :lol:
January 12, 2019 at 13:42
I think that it's not so much that there aren't enough of us to fill these gaps in the job market, but more that there aren't enough of us who are wil...
January 11, 2019 at 16:34
Lol! You're kidding yourself if you believe that. Your right wing views stand out like a sore thumb. And you seem much more like the UKIP type than th...
January 11, 2019 at 13:00
:roll: It's consistently rated as number one in terms of accuracy and reliability out of UK news sources. I'm curious, who do you think you're arguing...
January 11, 2019 at 10:34
There's a lot of criticism against that argument. See here. Firstly, it makes no sense whatsoever to say that a mystery suggests theism. A mystery sug...
January 11, 2019 at 08:40
To me, that's pie in the sky romanticism, unsuited to the questioning, critical discussion, and rational argument associated with the philosophical me...
January 10, 2019 at 23:19
Just FYI:
January 10, 2019 at 22:25
Have you read the Bible?
January 10, 2019 at 18:57
I don't think that that's such a big mystery. It's difficult to forgot what's around you. That would be a bit like trying to forgot politics or the en...
January 10, 2019 at 18:38
Predicable. I must remember to take you less seriously the next time it seems as though you're looking to challenge me. You've shown that as soon as t...
January 10, 2019 at 18:10
The rest of your post makes no sense, and completely ignores my reply which exposes the faulty assumptions in how you're attempting portray my positio...
January 10, 2019 at 18:01
Why on earth should I refrain from those discussions? That makes no sense. I'm challenging the claims of theism as unjustified. I'm not merely saying ...
January 10, 2019 at 17:26
You seem to be stuck in your own little world and do not seem to be accounting for what myself and DingoJones have been saying. You have beef with pos...
January 10, 2019 at 13:10
No, it's not an example of that fallacy. It's not fallacious, whatever the topic, to justify an absence of belief because of an absence of sufficient ...
January 10, 2019 at 13:02
There's a difference between known unknowns and unknown unknowns which is of relevance here. That claim you refer to above is rightly categorised unde...
January 10, 2019 at 07:27
If the ignorant refers only to those who have an unconscious lack of belief, then we aren't necessarily in disagreement. I get the argument for exclud...
January 10, 2019 at 07:12
If you had've clarified sooner, you would've gotten a different answer from me. Instead, you keep pushing these insidious suggestions about dishonesty...
January 10, 2019 at 06:57
I think that it's very important to think about meaning in relation to life, and I also believe that there are a number of similarly important questio...
January 09, 2019 at 22:38
After all that, that's what you respond with? So be it. I kind of feel like you've wasted my time. I was under the impression that you were trying to ...
January 09, 2019 at 21:41
Oh the irony. You don't like my answer, so you respond with an ad hominem. I highlighted the wording which makes it a loaded question. Before we can t...
January 09, 2019 at 21:18
The only sensible way to answer a loaded question is to identify it as such and await a response from the questioner.
January 09, 2019 at 20:57
How does any of that answer the question? The question did not ask whether or not we can make accurate predictions.
January 09, 2019 at 20:48
It is so for thinkers in comparison to my kind of atheism. It's the difference between stopping at the edge of a chasm and taking that extra step whic...
January 09, 2019 at 20:28
Yeah. Could it be that he's getting all defensive because he takes that as a slight, or maybe he's making the mistake of assuming that "they" are just...
January 09, 2019 at 19:02
Even if I were to accept the exclusion of those who have an unconscious lack of belief from the category of atheism, it seems wrong and futile to excl...
January 09, 2019 at 18:47
Right on? That's a red herring, mate.
January 09, 2019 at 18:38
That is not implied by what I said. You would be reading that into my comment. That depends on what parts matter and how they're interpreted. That's a...
January 09, 2019 at 17:33
You seem to have answered your own question. From what you've said, it doesn't have a unique role. And we have already past the turning point in histo...
January 09, 2019 at 13:43
No, not necessarily. If everyone realised that the answers that science provides are better, then that possible consequence would make sense. But sadl...
January 08, 2019 at 17:33
But in reality, that probably ain't gonna happen, because most voters vote for what they're for rather than what they're against, and the two major pa...
January 08, 2019 at 12:54
Are you both non-Tory and non-Labour? If so, that would make sense. A system other than first-past-the-post would be an advantage to the minor parties...
January 08, 2019 at 12:35
That we already have the option for what's known as a blank, null, or spoilt vote, and in light of the potential for this: I don't think that it's a g...
January 08, 2019 at 12:21
Nancy Pelosi for president.
January 07, 2019 at 19:43
No u.
January 07, 2019 at 18:47
It should be obvious that that doesn't really clarify anything and still leaves a lot of ambiguity. Healthy according to who? Or according to what cri...
January 07, 2019 at 08:42
No, it's not possible to be certain of the future, except psychologically for some people under the right circumstances. But it's always possible to b...
January 06, 2019 at 23:25