M'kay. Then my example would not convince you of dialetheism, and at this point in the debate I'd ask -- if dialetheism were somehow justified would t...
The liar's sentence. "This sentence is false" is the liar's sentence. This doesn't fit your "for example", though, because it's not about a person, bu...
Your choice of words here has me wondering if I can or not. But I can give a straightforward answer to your question which may be aside from the point...
I'm a defender of dialetheism, thus far. Which rules out the LNC. Hence, the notion of pluralism -- at least so far no one has said that the logics wh...
Heh. I wouldn't go that far at least. I think @"Leontiskos" and @"Count Timothy von Icarus" would want us to come up with a notion of logical monism w...
I wouldn't restrict the lounge like that. Off topic, but I think the various "wonderings" which are lounge-appropriate can lead to cool and interestin...
One thing unmentioned that I really like is the "A Very Short Introduction" series of books, as well as the "Introducing" series for similar reasons: ...
Yours has been the hardest to respond to for me. Hence my tardiness. If we substitute normative social practices for Kant's Transcendental categories,...
I agree. I came to the same conclusion, and was disappointed. "Further research needed" :D I enjoy the phenomenology, but only got 1/2 through the log...
My brush with dialethiesm, and thereby paraconsistent logic, came from my studies of the liar's paradox. So for me it's the result of reading argument...
It could be thought of as a regulative principle -- here we have multiple logics, but we would like them to cohere: the monist would then be more of a...
I believe that I do, and I'm happy that you continue to respond in spite of the frustration. Gonna call it for tonight and rethink stuff, though obvio...
Interesting. I like this approach of defining the difference as a matter of method. I notice a distinct lack of dialetheism in your approach ;) The wa...
Suppose that the liar's sentence is false. Then the liar's sentence is true because it says that it is false. Suppose that the liar's sentence is true...
Nice. I don't mean to speak for @"Joshs", but I'd say that "living in the moment", which is possible, does not negate the triadic structure Josh menti...
What makes you say that? I kind of thought of Tarski's paper, that I still struggle with reading, was basically a correspondence theory of truth? Eith...
Cool, got it. Makes sense. One doesn't have to accept true contradictions to abandon the principle of explosion -- it could be that contradictions sti...
Yes Here I am using it, no? Its use-case is philosophical, rather than pragmatic, but I don't think that makes it meaningless. Also I've changed over ...
M'kay, cool. I was looking for uses to get an idea of what you meant, and the one use-case I found looked like it fits with your idea of being a perso...
What does it mean to "say something"? I'll say more, though it's fair to ask what are the conditions you're after here -- what I have in mind is that ...
Ran a search and found only one paragraph with the phrase. Is this the one you mean to reference? It seems like the whole paragraph gets along with yo...
I prefer to think of it as putting it to the side as something that can be discussed separately -- which isn't to say our choice of a logic is metaphy...
Cool. I mean logic prior to Frege. The square isn't found in Prior Analytics, but I would consider the likes of Frege, Peirce, and Cantor as part of t...
I don't exactly object to classical logic, though -- I'm saying it has limitations, not that it's wrong in every case. To clarify -- the wiki on syllo...
I'll quote Gillian Russell here from the opening of her One True Logic?: Humean skepticism comes to mind -- it could be that our logical discourse is ...
Right! And far from rejecting classical logic it seems to me to give clarity to its underlying intuitions. These extensions of logic aren't so much an...
Do they need to be counterexamples to Aristotle? I don't think so. I think that I'd simply have to want to utilize some other logic -- and there are s...
That's a lot closer to home to my way of thinking -- and why I like Feyerabend's deconstruction of Popper as a kind of object lesson for all philosoph...
The difference I intend between pure (as such) logic and applied (transcendental) logic is that we can do logic without addressing questions of being,...
I'd put it that the question which asks about the relationship between logic and being is no longer doing pure logic. The distinction I think of that ...
I agree. Being wrong, and realizing it, is like removing a splinter which also gives me a new perspective. At one point I thought it a pain but I've c...
pretty sure the cracked pots are an exponential function such that if you allow 3 or 4 it's containable, but 6 or 7 might make all the non-crackpots b...
As the czar of catsup I must order you to silence -- catsup is always good, and in fact isn't even a condiment. It is the better food. It can go on ic...
My philosophy for new members is to give them grace when they don't understand, and extend charity to the point that it doesn't disrupt the community ...
Right. So there exist some modern cynics, or some rough equivalent there -- all social backgrounds include people who want drugs or are mentally ill b...
That's where I end up in my thinking -- the personhood of a foetus is more in question than the personhood of the mother, and so the rights of personh...
To answer the titular question: Post on others' posts. If you start a new topic in the main forum try to utilize some resource or other -- you'd be su...
Comments