You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Moliere

Comments

I want this thread to consist of less trolling. After your first attempt I decided it was important to have a public record to refer to. From here out...
April 06, 2025 at 13:02
Yes. "But did you think of this!" is pretty much off topic because, like any natural phenomena, there will be many things that relate to it -- we can ...
April 06, 2025 at 06:33
I have deleted comments regarding the effects of cold on human beings as off-topic.
April 06, 2025 at 01:20
Personally I'm fine with either formal or less formal writing. I'm not going to screen essays on that basis, anyways. Part of writing philosophy is ch...
April 04, 2025 at 16:43
There's a similarity there, but I'm not tempted to universalize based on that. But, yes, this technology -- supposing it's possible -- questions those...
March 29, 2025 at 23:59
The most disturbing thought that comes to mind is that the nervous system is so unnecessary that the BodyWithOrgans/not-brain is sentient in its own w...
March 29, 2025 at 23:34
Amen. :pray:
March 29, 2025 at 23:16
https://www.livescience.com/animals/giant-fungus-like-organism-may-be-a-completely-unknown-branch-of-life I had never heard of this organism before re...
March 28, 2025 at 12:56
Bodies with Organs (but no brains)
March 28, 2025 at 12:19
OK that makes sense seeing it like that rather than the muddle I wrote. (While it's interesting to me I claim little knowledge here) That helps me wor...
March 25, 2025 at 21:26
I think it's because quantum stuff is based on the notion that reality is discrete vs the continuous reality of the block universe; but, yes, if it's ...
March 25, 2025 at 21:12
I'm not sure, actually... That makes sense by what I said, but then your objection also hits home -- if there's a 1-to-1 mapping then really all I'm d...
March 25, 2025 at 11:56
In that case I'd say I'm in even less understanding of the difference between the "size" of infinite sets. The way it was explained to me was the diff...
March 25, 2025 at 01:06
Truth, so I'd put it, is a predicate which applies to sentences. Measurements can be true, but it's not the same as "true" above. I can be a true frie...
March 25, 2025 at 00:57
Oh, definitely. Or accurately? Precisely? :D I think this lays out a good difference between truth and measurement -- we have to be able to say that t...
March 25, 2025 at 00:45
Heh. Well, give it some time. Perhaps we'll figure out the non-physical way to measure time :D I can't say I agree with your first statement because "...
March 25, 2025 at 00:38
I think it's a half-fib when I speak to people who really believe that what you measure is what you get. You're right it's not a "fib" because measure...
March 25, 2025 at 00:34
Yup. The "accuracy" part of the distinction is what I consider to be a noble fib. Speaking to a person who believes that the gauge they've always used...
March 25, 2025 at 00:26
Actual measurements fail far above Planck's constants :) One of the concepts I've found hard to teach is the difference scientists attach to "accuracy...
March 24, 2025 at 23:57
The paradox between discrete and continuous seems a good example, to me on the outside, as something to treat Zeno's paradoxes as genuine paradoxes. T...
March 24, 2025 at 23:30
Mostly, though, I want people who are interested in the idea to participate; insofar that the "rules" enhance participation then thems the rules we sh...
March 20, 2025 at 02:33
I'm good with spinning out some possible topics for help here in this thread insofar that we all are thinking together.
March 19, 2025 at 16:43
Not quite. @"Jamal" robbed me of this notion once upon a time -- it's not Newtonian mechanics as much as the basis of natural science which contrasts ...
March 17, 2025 at 18:25
Hah! :D
March 17, 2025 at 17:48
And, also, I may be lost in the noise.
March 17, 2025 at 17:38
Heh, fair. I'm familiar, but undecided on the right way to read. My preference is actually for the one-world interpretation, though it may only be a p...
March 17, 2025 at 17:37
And @"Mww" I don't believe that Hegel cared to understand Kant in the "proper" sense --i.e. in the sense that he'd count as a Kantian -- he only riffs...
March 17, 2025 at 16:53
I own a copy of Science of Logic by Hegel, but it's huge. It's the A. V. Miller translation. I'm wondering what the ISBN of that book is in your pictu...
March 17, 2025 at 16:48
Far too few of us, I'm afraid.
March 17, 2025 at 16:44
Ahhh OK. Makes sense. ... Now I might be contradicting myself, but then it seems like philosophy might be useful at something after all ;)
March 17, 2025 at 16:39
I cannot claim to say I always felt this way, but I do now. I believe that all moral systems are flawed. I do not believe that they are futile. I can ...
March 16, 2025 at 19:22
I think it's important to see that Heidegger never ended Being and Time by his own design. I think he got lost in his own hermeneutic, or perhaps just...
March 13, 2025 at 23:12
You're making me want to become persnickity in the use of terms :D "Intuition" has a special meaning in Kant, for instance -- it's the form in which t...
March 13, 2025 at 23:08
Yeahrp. :up: No. There's a lot of lingo there that can be interpreted in various ways. But "No", I think, is the true answer to all of your questions ...
March 13, 2025 at 22:07
I think that's about right. To continue the metaphor, though, I'd say that we're grasping for something we sense but do not know where it's at -- such...
March 13, 2025 at 21:49
:chin: I've no idea what you're talking about. Any links for the ignorant?
March 13, 2025 at 21:09
According to Bertrand Russell it was the transcendental aesthetic, in the CPR. I'd say it's his introduction to the CPR, though. A and B editions make...
March 12, 2025 at 23:50
Can confirm.
March 12, 2025 at 23:30
I encourage you to participate on that basis, else fall into performative contradiction ;) But, yes -- my thinking is that it ought be a celebration o...
March 12, 2025 at 23:21
Good point. "contradiction" is part of the logic, but in Kantian terms I'd say he'd deny that contradiction is ever true in the transcendental logic.
March 12, 2025 at 23:14
Heh, if Kant was anything he was not an absurdist, in my view. More the opposite -- that everything which can be understood can be understood in logic...
March 12, 2025 at 23:10
j No. Kant's use of the antinomies was to demonstrate that we do not know such things -- we can rationally argue for both the assertion and the negati...
March 12, 2025 at 22:07
Welcome, brother! :D To my circle of thinking that ends in . .. circles... of thinking......
March 12, 2025 at 01:57
Does anyone have no expectations? Is that a good basis for understanding irony at all? I can't say what David Moore means. I don't take Quora seriousl...
March 12, 2025 at 01:26
heh ,no. The thought that came to mind was how if the thread was posited this or the other way @"Banno" would say his bit, and I was thinking how it'd...
March 12, 2025 at 01:11
And you would have been right, just as you are right now. :D
March 12, 2025 at 01:05
To keep my annoying persona, I must say both-and :D I didn't mean that up front though. And find: A refreshing change of pace. I'll take as the origin...
March 12, 2025 at 00:47
Well, you responding in this manner makes me wonder if I understand the joke? I'm guessing we all pretty much get the joke?
March 12, 2025 at 00:38
We shall overcome, though. Unless we throw spanners in.
March 12, 2025 at 00:31
Well, it must be the calculation since the thread will never satisfy -- given how often we go past the point of explanation here :D
March 12, 2025 at 00:03