You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Paine

Comments

I try to see through those lenses. But my personal and family quality of life will suffer if those changes occur. My workplace will change for the wor...
February 04, 2025 at 19:55
What was it like? Does this dream of Manifest Destiny promise to bring the old USA back? Musk and Zuckerberg run global empires whose fortunes will in...
February 04, 2025 at 18:35
It will be surprising if Canada puts together a rope-a-dope response to the tariffs of the kind that Mexico has done. Each of the Provinces have been ...
February 03, 2025 at 21:51
As far as values go, Nietzsche drew a sharp distinction between Christianity and ancient philosophers:
February 02, 2025 at 22:56
The scope of the book, of which I am less than halfway through, is said by Rödl to address the validity of empirical judgements by the end of it. That...
February 02, 2025 at 00:14
It was the day before tariffs and all through the house, not a creature was stirring, unless you were one of the many nations planning their responses...
January 31, 2025 at 23:56
What is being opposed by Rödl is the ground for thinking: By speaking of how "objectivity and self-consciousness can be conjoined", Rödl is sounding a...
January 31, 2025 at 17:16
The Klima quote does demonstrate that he and Rödl are both addressing a shared understanding of force/content propositions. 's description of second o...
January 30, 2025 at 15:33
Now that T company has had to retreat from the federal funding freeze fiasco, I wonder if they will carry out the promised tariff show on Feb 1. These...
January 29, 2025 at 23:00
You presume what you might conclude. If 'matter' is not a something we encounter in experience, then it has been shuttled off into another ward. No ne...
January 29, 2025 at 00:58
From what I have gathered so far, that is not Rödl's interest. It is in 2.7 that the objection to the force/content distinction comes to a head: Wheth...
January 28, 2025 at 22:13
The Federal Grant Freeze announced today has already started to draw lawsuits. The broad sweep is a thumb in the eye of the Legislative Branch as they...
January 28, 2025 at 19:40
T administration has their best people on it. The broad sweep of the federal raids has already prompted many workers to stay home in California.
January 28, 2025 at 17:38
Fair enough.
January 27, 2025 at 00:23
What is a self in the thesis is not a given. The critique of the Fregean sets of references moves away from the self who affirms stuff (or not) in all...
January 26, 2025 at 23:54
Have you not settled all possible readings to be useless?
January 26, 2025 at 00:17
While I appreciate many of your observations, the arrogance of this remark is not a benefit.
January 26, 2025 at 00:10
That is odd to hear after your years of arguing for a particular vision of that above others.
January 25, 2025 at 23:58
I was not predicting who came out on top. Just pointing to a paradox to accepting trump's conditions for those interested in doing a particular job.
January 25, 2025 at 23:18
As the matter involves the balance of power between the executive and the legislative branches, even the most hard core trumpsters may not kiss the ri...
January 25, 2025 at 23:00
Since the IGs are a crucial element of Congressional oversight, it will be interesting to see if the GOP will let this go forward. At the very least, ...
January 25, 2025 at 22:29
Are you saying this in response to actually reading the book or stating an opinion in general about such attempts?
January 25, 2025 at 01:25
So, what do you make of Rödl's statement that Nagel is making a similar mistake? (as pointed to previously}.
January 24, 2025 at 22:05
I think the problem of talking about what is a new 'thought' has to first pass through the issue of the first person being the one making the judgemen...
January 24, 2025 at 21:45
The non-discriminating pardon of 1/6 criminals is bad for the rule of law. It specifically empowers those who see themselves as executors of T's will ...
January 22, 2025 at 00:52
I get that you do not desire retribution. But there are others who do. What to do with them? Will they have power in the coming days? You seem confide...
January 21, 2025 at 00:42
Is your condition bereft of any differences that choices made will affect outcomes? Your laughter is like that of the gods.
January 20, 2025 at 23:35
Why comment when so satisfied with your superior position?
January 20, 2025 at 23:25
There is an ambiguity in your delight. You are above the fray.
January 20, 2025 at 23:19
Said like a true adult.
January 20, 2025 at 23:14
The latest T proposals speak of sending U.S. military down to the border before figuring out how that fits in with the other federal, state, and count...
January 20, 2025 at 23:00
I need to read and think more about it but perhaps Rödl may not want to accept all of Hegel either. Mww's account of the 'thinking substance' undersco...
January 20, 2025 at 19:18
I think Rödl is greatly influenced by Hegel's criticism of Kant. The expression of common ground can be found here: Where Rödl diverges from Kant rela...
January 20, 2025 at 15:43
On the eve of the new executive, it is impossible to know which part of the rhetoric was bluster and what was not. Will there be trade wars, the remov...
January 20, 2025 at 01:58
This says to me that the problem is not an unnecessary division. Rödl objects to Nagel and Moore in this way: The proposed solution is not to find a r...
January 19, 2025 at 23:20
What puzzles me in your charge of dishonesty is that it dissolves Rödl's efforts to separate first person thinking from objective judgment. Whatever u...
January 19, 2025 at 21:52
Rödl proposes "absolute idealism" as the way forward from where Nagel and Moore stopped: As your reference to the Hegel formula suggests, the goal is ...
January 19, 2025 at 17:21
Pardon me, that was a lame response. I will try giving a better one soon. I need to work for a bit.
January 16, 2025 at 18:50
If the problem is not like Nagel put it, then it is another problem. Röd proposes an alternative response after honoring Nagel for making it a problem...
January 16, 2025 at 02:04
Is not the Harmann quote appealing to those who have nothing to gain from the outcome?
January 16, 2025 at 00:03
January 15, 2025 at 23:59
Said like an entry in a text that does not concern you.
January 15, 2025 at 23:56
I have a problem with the encyclopedic approach to expression of ideas. Half of me roots for Harman's language while the other half objects to another...
January 15, 2025 at 23:49
About the remark about schools of thought?
January 15, 2025 at 23:40
I don't accept the pertinence of schools as presented here but do credit Harman for giving an excellent rant.
January 15, 2025 at 23:29
Thanks to you and to Wayfarer. Whatever else comes from the book, it is a different way to approach what has often been discussed on the forum before.
January 15, 2025 at 00:54
Rödl is more specific about where Nagel and Moore miss the mark: Put that way, "non-duality" sounds like a bridge between the terms as opposites where...
January 15, 2025 at 00:01
Rödl treats Nagel as the last exit from the highway of absolute idealism: This seems to be where Rödl also moves beyond Kant (as referred to here). Th...
January 14, 2025 at 14:34
I was just reading the post as it appeared. Did not realize that you were drawing from your notes. Taken at face value, that is a description of thing...
January 13, 2025 at 00:27
Now that I am reading Self-Consciousness and Objectivity, it would help if you cited where you are quoting from. I read the Schopenhauer passage as no...
January 12, 2025 at 23:36