@"Michael" I'll leave it for now as we're coming at it from different angles. I think you are treating the first and second event as independent and I...
There can never be a possible spread from £5 to £20 given that you've chosen an envelope already. Given that you've already chosen and you've chosen o...
I don't understand why you don't understand. There is no point in this scenario after an envelope is chosen where X( £5) and 4X(£20) are compatible po...
No I didn't. I said I don't know what happened with that but in future if something gets folded in you don't agree with you have the right to complain...
Whether you benefit by switching or not is dependent on what envelope you just chose, which must be Envelope X or Envelope 2X where X is a given sum o...
Not sure if you saw my edit: The only combinations given that you have a 10 are A or B. Therefore picking 10 is incompatible with both a possibility o...
If the envelope contains 10 then the original pair must have been either A(5 and 10) or B(10 and 20) according to the OP description. If it was A(5 an...
Two envelopes are e.g. 5 (X) and 10 (2X) - Pick 10(2X) and switch get X - But if you've already picked 2X you cannot get 2(2X). There is no 4X (20). T...
Mm, that sounds right. I certainly can't think of any (non-religious) principle that would cover regular sexual intercourse and not also cover oral an...
Yes, it is, which is why I answered you and Phil O Sophy and Free Emotion. It's just getting repetitive. The answer's not going to change: I'd like to...
And I don't know anything about what's been folded in here. You can take that up with Street. The OP is the OP and we're in the Lounge. That's the con...
The stance is not specifically about Trump. The stance is that if the conversation, any conversation, is in the Lounge and the OP specifically describ...
And again, I don't know how many million times I have to mention this, but we're in the Lounge in a discussion that is meant to include, for example: ...
No it's not. And you've just made a bare assertion without trying to reason for it, so that puts you in a self-defeating position here regarding reaso...
We are in the Lounge category, so this is not a philosophical discussion (plus again, see the OP). If it were a philosophical discussion, it would nee...
There'll always be bias and there'll always be a degree of double standard in that sense, but the specific argument is over whether outrage from the l...
It seems credible to me as it's unlikely all those that witnessed and reported it are lying, and let's face it considering Trump's actions and words b...
http://www.newsweek.com/trump-racist-apprentice-tape-sexist-claims-producer-678944 “We recorded constantly. We went into the boardroom to set up discu...
Trump is a racist with Neo-nazi sympathies as Charlottesville showed but Hanover will vote for him anyway because of those lefties and their outrage. ...
https://lawandcrime.com/high-profile/twitter-explodes-after-homeland-security-headline-appears-to-mimic-14-words-neo-nazi-slogan/ This article which s...
It's weird and it wouldn't surprise if some alt right troll in the admin helped put it together and spiked it for his own amusement. No American admin...
You could try Thailand although job ops are limited to teaching. But yes, with the supreme court going full right-wing, you're in serious doo doo over...
You didn't answer to my point: Roseanne comparing a black person to an ape in order to belittle her is worse in degree of offensiveness to Bill Maher ...
That's a good one. Can you write a poem about it? Never mind, I will. There was a young lad called Baden, Who knew not what country he lived in, raza ...
No, I didn't. I made some important distinctions and qualifications (including using words such as "gray area" "probably" and most importantly pointin...
No, but you can make racist actions, like refusing to hire someone because they're black or they're a woman, a criminal and / or civil offense. And we...
Quote me where I contradicted myself then. What I said above is a criticism of your argument not an expression of mine. I explained my position very c...
Pointing out that discrimination used to be embedded in law is about the worst argument you could possibly make for having anti-discrimination not emb...
Maybe things are simpler for you because you have a tendency to conflate and ignore nuance. Sanders was refused on the basis of her behaviour not her ...
And I say if you think he's not aware of the effect of his words, you are extremely naive about the nature of politicians. Maybe you just have a rosie...
If you are trying to say they weren't well organized enough, I'd agree, and would invite you to write an instructional pamphlet for the next attempt a...
I've heard this what-aboutism so many times and it's just boringly easy to refute. I mean do you really think comparing a person of black heritage to ...
I'd add that Sanders was refused because of her behaviour, not because she's white, not because she's a Republican etc. And as with the Roseanne case,...
Comments