Baden

I like that. Very often a dissonant twinge can reveal a hidden premise or some other logical (or otherwise) fault or omission if we're paying proper a...

This comment has virtually nothing to do with what I wrote either in terms of its intention or its substance. Short enough for you? :point: :up:

And thanks for the push. :wink:

Hey thanks! It could do with a little more exemplification here and there, but I feel like it was an afternoon well-spent anyhow. It was either that o...

Thank you, oh purveyor of Bannoism and all things goatish.

Give a shot at clarifying it. If that doesn't work, ignore them because no matter how much of a failure these people are at argumentation, they are li...

Cheers bro', will pin it in resources.

(Thought this might be useful for the learning centre and @"Amity" asked me to do it. So, there you go.)

Alright, did that. I put it in the learning centre for now: https://thephilosophyforum.com/discussion/7014/effective-argumentation

Well, you did a better job. I'm not sure that will please @"Wallows", but no doubt we'll find out.

This isn't very responsive to my post. I'm not calling for outrage, for example, I'm calling for awareness, preciseness, and diligence in the use of w...

(I might add that I'm very sympathetic to the rule of thumb of considering race realists racists, they almost always are, but collapsing the precise d...

:up: It's not really that simple. When it comes to politically loaded terms, definitions can have important consequences. If you dilute the definition...

No. I try to keep that stuff separate. I've started writing something along the lines suggested though, so I'll keep you posted. :up:

Check out all this attention. @"Banno" eat your heart out. :wink: Actually, I've started a blog on various aspects of writing on my site, including ho...

No, that's not what happened. Done here. And another goes on ignore.

And here's my takeaway from the local Banno Pizzeria. /uploads/resized/files/ub/hz0ojp136u82rig4.jpg

Another candidate for world's biggest arsehole. And, surprisingly, it's not Piers. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3iJ5uqdpEm0 This is why people hate...

You're completely wrong on this point and @"creativesoul" is right. Separate definitions are separated by numbers in dictionaries and such, or if not,...

So, the proposal is Banno celeb pizza for the front page. I suppose if you put a bit more effort in to the OP, I wouldn't object. PM me your best shot...

Maybe pick one of his ideas and go with it.

Sure, but didn't know you wanted the full celebrity treatment luvvie. Lol. Look at my questions above. There's no law against using Banno's ideas and ...

Look at the various definitions: This one: "2. One who believes that the human species is divided into observable races." is pretty much exactly: I'm ...

That's more specifically a definition of "race realism". https://en.m.wiktionary.org/wiki/race_realist

Oh, they're predominantly academic style guides for my editing work (Chicago, MLA, APA, Turabian etc). They're very fine grained and differ on minutia...

The fact that you are too lazy to scroll up and read is indicative of the pointlessness of dealing with you. You've earned Chrome ignore. Good luck.

Yeah, hence the comment. If I thought you spent all your time on the forums, I wouldn't have said that, would I? The only question in that is what rac...

Lol. Not since I started on philosophy forums. :nerd:

Look, if you don't like the decision, appeal it. I have a feeling though I'm actually one of the more indulgent of you among the mods. I reckon you're...

As I've tried to make clear, the move has nothing to do with the quality of @"Banno"'s philosophy. I like the old goat.

You made at least 4 discussions in the past 24 hours. Stop making discussions for a while and when you do, please fulfil the elements of a decent OP a...

A few questions: 1) Did you ask Banno if you could analyze his ideas on the front page? 2) What of substance did you contribute to your own OP? 3) Wha...

Work out the non-sequitur there then get back to me with a better objection.

Clever.

Hehe, I doubt Tiff will join you in that sentiment on this occasion. Not to worry though, I'll make a Marxist of her yet. Might take a huge pizza brib...

Conversations with Zizek—Zizek with Glyn Daly And a bunch of grammar/style guides for work.

Presuming no major third-party runs, Trump will lose 46 to 49 against any Dem short of Biden or Bernie (who'd both break 50). The electoral college wo...

Political Darwin award shared?

No idea what this has to do with my post. Hardly. But he's unlikely to come here and debate, so you'll have to do.

Stupid working-class dummies burned themselves to death. I would never do such a thing. What? Did I say something wrong? Surely, Mogg must be a sleepe...

Along with Trump, another great liberal hero of yours, I guess.

The word "racial" is neutral. It just means pertaining to race. There are good and bad ways to address issues concerning race. So, it means nothing to...

@"frank" Who knows when HH will show up. So, might as well give you my own definition I held back earlier. Doubt it differs much from the standard. Sy...

Why is so much rambling theological verbiage given space on 'The Philosophy Forum'? Because @"Hanover" was chewing on Doritos and watching MMA when he...

Yes.

I'll post my own definition afterwards, but I don't want to be accused of prejudicing any replies. I want Harry to look it up himself from a neutral s...

You're on Chrome extension ignore now. @"Harry Hindu", if you're capable, answer the question.

Do you realize that I asked a simpler question above in order to begin the process of clarification? Do you realize that above you answered that simpl...

Your usual tactic of answering questions with questions. :yawn: In what way could you justify society not at all being involved in identity formation?

This has nothing to do with natural selection. We're presuming the existence of humans of both sexes. So, I'll try again. To start off: Society, at wh...