You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Alkis Piskas

Comments

I agree. You aren't. :grin:
December 29, 2023 at 08:58
I don't think I missed anything. I made this comment referring to your saying "Look up the definition of a word in the dictionary. Then look up the de...
December 29, 2023 at 08:11
The following is from https://www.etymonline.com/word/sensation sensation (n.) 1610s, "a reaction to external stimulation of the sense organs," from F...
December 28, 2023 at 19:55
"Sensation" is mainly a widely used scientific term, as it refers to the senses, a mental condition and physical feeling, all of which are used in the...
December 28, 2023 at 12:14
Judaka, I think I undestood your concerns. You are referring to a kind of "constant" use of definitions in a discussion, writing or speech. And your p...
December 27, 2023 at 13:49
Thank you for participating in the discussion. Right. Do you refer to a particular lexicon, like a specialized dictionary or encyclopedia --e.g. Oxfor...
December 26, 2023 at 19:09
Thank you for responding to the topic. Of course not. I talked about that (multiple times). Yes, this is normally the case. When children don't undest...
December 26, 2023 at 18:48
Thanks for your reply to the topic. And welcome to TPF! :cheer: Good point. I will take up this later ... This is a very plausible question. Ah! You g...
December 25, 2023 at 19:32
Thank you for responding to the topic. Of course dictionaries sometimes contain ineffective definitions. But it is obvious that one is not bound or su...
December 24, 2023 at 19:10
Thanks for your reply to the topic. Whys would I do I have to read a whole page or I don't not how much text in order to get the meaning of the word. ...
December 24, 2023 at 15:02
Thanks for replying to the topic. This is the perfect, absolute way one would use if one wants to become "superliterate". But this is rarily the case,...
December 24, 2023 at 14:11
Thanks for your reply to the topic, Fooloso4. This might be the case, but in these cases they describe, explain and even give the definition of the me...
December 24, 2023 at 12:22
Do you propose to throw all dictionaries and encyclopedias to the garbage can and with them more than 4,000 years of knowledge? (The first recorded di...
December 14, 2023 at 16:37
Certainly. Maybe the other way around ... In order to be aware of something you must first perceive it, don't you? Does this mean that you just don't ...
December 14, 2023 at 11:00
OK. Just checking ... :smile: Well, I find this somewhat twisted, but anyway, it's besides what we are looking for, i.e. the word "feeling" and how it...
December 14, 2023 at 08:52
I guess you have a different definition of the term "sentient" than the ones I presented and what is commonly meant by them. Indeed, I don't know what...
December 13, 2023 at 10:53
What do you mean by "from the exterior and interior"? Example? I have studied and worked a lot and for quite long with mind, and of course thinking as...
December 13, 2023 at 09:18
Quite interesting. This contributes a lot to the lack of knowledge I have about the kind of senses plants have and how do they work, which I was talki...
December 12, 2023 at 13:08
I think that the terms "sentient" and "sentience" is misconceived by many here from what I could gather from this and other discussions (topics). "Sen...
December 12, 2023 at 11:13
No problem, AmadeusD. You don't have to apologize. Esp., not in advance! :smile: I agree. S and C are two totally diffetent things; of a totally diffe...
December 11, 2023 at 12:58
"grin" It may sound difficult but my "filtering" is an automatic process: it means just ignoring external refs, thus actually simplifying things. "smi...
December 11, 2023 at 12:31
Certainly. But my comment was certainly not meant to invalidate your references. I never said or hold in general that references are useless. That wou...
December 11, 2023 at 10:15
Why being "not emotionally" against it? Isn't just "not against" it enough? :smile The question I think is whether we can make a solid, well-grounded ...
December 10, 2023 at 11:41
But I just gave you a reference about that, the definition of "Panpsychism". Do you reject it, as well as all references with a similar description, o...
December 10, 2023 at 09:32
Well, I can't tell. It's too general. Even after your elaboration of it, it's too theoretical for me. I love Math but not so muach on a theoretical le...
December 09, 2023 at 19:20
What about a ball? Or a pencil? :smile: "Stone" was just an example, Patterner. Any object would do. And surely you must have heard about matter havin...
December 09, 2023 at 18:57
Well, I undestood that in the first place. But what that has to do with the current topic, "Why is the Hard Problem of Consciousness so hard?" Do you ...
December 09, 2023 at 13:01
Why, is there an "Unconscious Experience"? :smile: Yes, I know about panpsychism. And I'm totally against it. Simply, I cannot imagine how a stone can...
December 09, 2023 at 12:25
That's much better! Why didn't you talk about that in the first place? Anyway, thanks for coming back with something that can be discussed about. :smi...
December 08, 2023 at 19:24
OK, but I also said that the term was not used in the meaning is used meaning today. Which is what we are trying to define. Certainly. Describing the ...
December 08, 2023 at 16:07
Well, you did use Nagel line. In fact, your whole message was based on it. Not only that, you referred me to @RogueAI 's question "Do you think there ...
December 08, 2023 at 11:49
I see. I know. That's why I said that it might take some time. But you don't need to do it perfectly. Anyway, I brought up this little "experiment" to...
December 08, 2023 at 11:00
Certainly. I just took it up and expanded it, because of my linguistic tendencies (I'm overplaying sometimes! :smile:) Well, the very common expressio...
December 07, 2023 at 11:50
It was my reply to @Gnome, who wondered whether plants can perceive or not. And it was not based on my comment on Nagel's "what it is like", which was...
December 07, 2023 at 10:52
I can't even know what it is like to be another person! :smile: Now, this is not serious. And I wonder how come you are asking me this, why have you c...
December 07, 2023 at 10:36
I believe you are referring to the etymology of C. Indeed, it's from Latin "con", which means "with", and scientia, which means "knowledge", i.e. "kno...
December 06, 2023 at 19:35
Certainly, you are not usually "aware" that you are alive. It would be quite annoying and useless, wouldn't it? But you can be id you want, right? To ...
December 06, 2023 at 09:41
Blindsight. Never heard of that before. Just looked it up. Wow, this looks quite interesting. I will have to learn more about it. So, at the moment I ...
December 06, 2023 at 08:54
Having the experience of consciousness, i.e. being aware, does not necessary involve meaningful mental images, or even mental images (i.e. thinking) a...
December 05, 2023 at 18:55
You are right. The word "definition" was not a good choice of mine. But I certainly didn't mean a technical definition. I meant rather a description. ...
December 05, 2023 at 17:41
Well, the word "feeling" has millions of meanings, and such a definition of conciousness is quite vague. Yet, it could be acceptable, if neurophysiolo...
December 05, 2023 at 09:04
Nice. I rarily see people connecting consciousness with experience. (In the sense of human feeling, as you say.) For me, consciousness is basically ex...
December 04, 2023 at 18:21
:up: Mainly that.
December 04, 2023 at 17:30
I undestand what you say. Indeed, I ignored the part of "there are facts of the matter", which plays a role in moral statements. However, this does no...
December 01, 2023 at 07:39
I didn't give an actual definition of "moral realism", but just a raw, very simplified description, just enough to present my views. And what I said a...
November 30, 2023 at 18:32
I won't convince you about moral realism, because you don't need it. :smile: I will instead support you in your goal. Although you don't actuall need ...
November 30, 2023 at 17:50
OK
November 29, 2023 at 08:46
When I say that there is an object on the table and that the name of this object is "apple", these are facts. I'm telling the truth. When I think abou...
November 28, 2023 at 19:45
Yes, you can call it an illusion. This is what a lot of Easter polosophies assert. But I never liked this term that is used to actually mean our perso...
November 28, 2023 at 13:49
Exactly. This is what I'm saying. Too conceptual. :smile: In fact, totally theoretical. Moreover, I can't even see how it applies to your "if I don't ...
November 28, 2023 at 08:44