No, I pointed out far much more than that; I'm sorry you're having reading problems. So, the only pointless words were all yours. No, I've had to make...
Oh my. Relax, Locks. You said "good point," which means "good point," and I pointed out it wasn't. Using your faulty logic, one could say "good point"...
Actually, it's not a good point since my assertion was founded on the notion one couldn't assert something existed until it was found, not that everyt...
Then you've never seen an actual physical demonstration of reality, as in you've never seen a car drive or plane fly. Those are physical demonstration...
You may have noticed that Michael Ossipoof is making lame personal attacks, which makes him a troll. I never did either of these things, and Ossipoff ...
And this isn't an assertion; it is a crafted argument. However, feel free to counter and show how the experience of one person can speak for an entire...
I disagree, but again, we're making wide sweeping statements here. ?Noble Dust >:O ?Noble Dust I have experienced Christianity this way, so it must be...
I Actually, I have--in my last post, and in the post before where you ignored the part below. But since you've offered no actual points, we're definit...
You can disagree, but you'd be wrong, — John Harris Yes, you can disagree, but you'd be wrong, and no childish--are you over 18?--emolji changes that....
No, mostly they don't, and if they do go negative it's usually on "guilt,' not "shame"...very different things. The reality is most Christians, includ...
Again personal experience is never enough to speak for the realities of the group. Using that logic, a woman who was raped by a police officer could s...
You can disagree, but you'd be wrong, and when you disagree you are making wide sweeping statements here, so I guess we'll keep making them. Anyone sh...
I would say we should both avoid making such a gestalt. But if we were to comment on that gestalt/zeitgeist of the faith, then I would say most, parti...
Sure it is, and grouping members of all the various Christian groups in one gestalt is a mistake and a poor indicator. Many Christians, particularly A...
Christianity is all about the person since Christ revealed the divinity inherent in all people. And not all Christians, or even all Catholic scholars,...
Since we became an enlightened, scientific society. Otherwise people with your standard could point to a rock and say "look, there's a soul," or point...
Except scientific verification is still required for consensual agreement on existence of entities. Again, using your weak standards, people can asser...
Sure it hasn't been demonstrated. What you referred to was theorizing, not demonstrating. Using your faulty logic, many people have demonstrated God, ...
What you miss about that definition, and Comtes, of positivism, is it doesn't just reject non-scientific methods for determining the scientific existe...
I'm not trying to hide anything. I lost my password and wanted to respond to the posts addressed to me on the "soul" thread. And I am old school with ...
No, the thing I call "life" is life. What people like you call the soul or prana or Qi or Christ's spirit or the boogeyman are different things entire...
Life is evidence of life, not the soul. Your reasoning is as bizarre as your worldview. And I've experienced life, but you surely haven't . You've red...
No, it's not and you need to show the science and scientific effort that even tried to do that. Denying qualia is no different than denying God or ang...
No, you denied life by calling it the soul and you gave no evidence. You don't even know what that word means. That's not surprising, you don't know w...
I didn't say "demonstrated to me;" I correctly said it hasn't been demonstrated, period, and it hasn't. So, I'm going to have to mention the words "pr...
Sorry, you appealed to supernatural forces since you appeal to the soul which has never been shown or revealed in nature. So, you're right there with ...
None of that has been demonstrated. And, sorry, but there is no evidence that any of those things, including the soul, are real and you havent' provid...
Of course we all haven't. It is not the life force inside us all, and nobody has shown it to be. Many say God gives us life too, that's no less ridicu...
And you argue incorrectly since all living things are animated and it is not the soul that causes it. So, your term fails. If you want to call life "s...
The real question is on what principle do you say the soul was discovered and named. Using your logic, God, the angels, and the demons were discovered...
No, it doesn't. We know where memory and mnemotic activity occurs but we have no idea where one word is located as opposed to another and in which par...
Words aren't stored in any one singular part of the brain, and no neurologist claims that. So, that comparison doesn't work. However, the soul has not...
Sorry, you compared the soul to the part of our brain that generates language, a physical part of the brain, so you did argue the soul as something th...
I've made clear I'm no idiot, Cashkev, unlike you trying to compensate for your poor education and intelligence with your hilarious pretentious posts ...
No, not knowing the exact in a particular organ causing a particular effect does not make the cause of that effect supernatural; it makes it natural b...
Sorry, ensoulment has no basis in reality since the a material soul has never been discovered or recorded. It makes as much sense as believing in ange...
No, you're missing the point Meta. A rock is still a physical object that was discovered and named, a soul isn't. So, your comparison is completely no...
Comments