You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

John Harris

['Member']Joined: August 12, 2017 at 01:13Last active: August 19, 2017 at 21:31None discussions248 comments

Comments

If you don't consider Agustino's horridly sexist posts as sexist, then you are sexist too. But feel free to denounce them as sexist any time. And sorr...
August 16, 2017 at 23:10
No, it's not basically that at all. It was specifically saying that women on TV actually wanted to be groped by Trump and were also lying hypocrites t...
August 16, 2017 at 23:08
Yeah, I'll definitely give you credit for that. You expressed an important point really well, there.
August 16, 2017 at 23:05
I got ya. Thanks for the clarification.
August 16, 2017 at 22:58
Except by failing to admit his sexist post was sexist and wrong and failing to apologize to Mongrel, and actually slandering her for rightly accusing ...
August 16, 2017 at 22:46
I didn't say you "attacked" me, so that own strong word was of your dishonest making. I said you took an erroneous swipe at me and you did. And don't ...
August 16, 2017 at 22:45
Sure, but he hasn't admitted he was wrong or even admitted his posts were sexist. So, he's made it clear he has no interest in learning or changing an...
August 16, 2017 at 22:41
No, he successfully branded himself with his sexist posts.
August 16, 2017 at 22:33
That's your personal opinion, one with which Mongrel and I clearly don't agree. The only prejudices shown was Agustino's sexist posts, post with which...
August 16, 2017 at 22:33
Pipe down, Beebert; you're not making your wrong stance right by getting hysterical. We didn't attack him. He wrote some horridly sexist posts and we ...
August 16, 2017 at 22:22
Oh, no, we handled It very well, and you haven't shown otherwise. However, you handled it very poorly by supporting Agustino in his sexist posts.
August 16, 2017 at 22:18
And it's ironic and disgusting that you slandered Mongrel on your own "slander" thread:
August 16, 2017 at 22:11
No, I addressed the topic (as I always have) as I was addressing Buddha's post. Stop being hysterical.
August 16, 2017 at 22:09
Actually, when Mongrel was asked to show one of Agustino's racist posts, she did just that, and I provided another, and Baden thought both were sexist...
August 16, 2017 at 22:06
Sorry, until you take down what you said about Mongrel, it still is about her. So, take down what you said about her and I will stop talking about her...
August 16, 2017 at 21:49
You can decide the topic of the thread, but you can't stop people from addressing what you yourself brought up, and you brought up Mongrel and accused...
August 16, 2017 at 21:48
Sorry, you, yourself, made if very clear it's about Mongrel and what she said in your massive passage below: You can't write all that and then say it'...
August 16, 2017 at 21:45
Sorry, you made it about Mongrel and sexism by bringing her up and wrongly using her as your main example. Sorry, the OP doesn't get to censor or boss...
August 16, 2017 at 21:42
No, it's not beside the point; it backs up my point Baden did find your statements to be sexist. And I'm going anywhere. If you accuse Mongrel of slan...
August 16, 2017 at 21:36
No, based on your sexist statements, Mongrel's statements were very legitimate presumptions, not slanderous at all.
August 16, 2017 at 21:34
Yes they were. Baden and one other moderator considered them sexist. Go ask him.
August 16, 2017 at 21:33
Sorry, we can't discuss slander without discussing your horridly sexist posts, that even the moderators thought were sexist. So, you can't accuse Mong...
August 16, 2017 at 21:29
No, the conclusion doesn't follow from the premises, since they aren't misusing gender terms and you haven't shown they have. But thanks for proving w...
August 16, 2017 at 19:52
Of course you are, and you just did it again by saying one could make a case transgered people are misusing gender terms, when that isn't a valid case...
August 16, 2017 at 19:46
No, it isn't. It's asking them what it means to them personally to be a man, not what it means to be a man generally; many don't know or care about th...
August 16, 2017 at 19:44
No, it doesn't, you asked this specific question and I answered it: Your question wasn't "what does it mean to be a man" so youre just shifting the go...
August 16, 2017 at 19:29
He means exactly that: he's a man...regardless of having a penis or ever having one. Many men have been castrated or even had their penises removed th...
August 16, 2017 at 19:19
You're just ranting now. I never said the brain wasn't involved or that mental states weren't tied to brain states. And since you're just lying about ...
August 16, 2017 at 18:47
Only by ignorant people. The AMA and association of psychiatrists all recognize gender as also being physiological (tied to the body). And thanks for ...
August 16, 2017 at 18:46
That's an odd question to ask. If they're not separate in some way, why are they two different words instead of one?
August 16, 2017 at 18:29
I gave you no reason to be confused. How do you define it?
August 16, 2017 at 18:28
O can do anything it wants, and it doesn't have to check infinite universe, for the existence of U, as it knows everything at all times and knows ther...
August 16, 2017 at 18:05
This is very well said.
August 16, 2017 at 17:55
Again, you forget the rest of the body, which are factors in one's gender.
August 16, 2017 at 17:14
No, gender is also a question of being, body, and self-awareness.
August 16, 2017 at 17:03
I never said it didn't. The real issue here is you are excluding the rest of the body as factors in gender, and that is wrong.
August 16, 2017 at 17:03
Sure I have, in my bold quote below Now it's your turn to do so.: No, I don't think so. But feel free to provide a link to back it up. I learned at un...
August 16, 2017 at 13:35
First of all, this is wrong, and you need to attach to a link, because it looks like you're making this up. Sexuality is not just a gender identificat...
August 16, 2017 at 13:20
And that's your biased opinion with no backup for that. Firstly, that means you, if you are Straight, could turn gay at any time if someone was able t...
August 16, 2017 at 12:55
Oh my. When someone says something is a psychological state, they are saying it's just that. And that's what I said it wasn't. So, again you read all ...
August 16, 2017 at 12:40
Yes, and as I said, poorly. Yes, they're not just psychological states. As I said, they're both psychological and physiological. That's one you read p...
August 16, 2017 at 12:35
No, I don't, since I made it clear that I see it as both, not just psychological like Unenlightened. You really read my posts poorly.
August 16, 2017 at 12:25
You obviously don't know since you keep showing you can't say what you mean or say why being Gay or Straight is psychological.
August 16, 2017 at 12:23
Anyone who doesn't say both has an uphill argument ahead of them.
August 16, 2017 at 12:21
in a bracketed sense, yes, but that doesn't exclude the majority of states that are both. And I was addressing unenlighhteneds particular claim, so yo...
August 16, 2017 at 12:19
So you have no idea what you mean when you say being Gay or Straight is psychological. At least you're getting somewhere.
August 16, 2017 at 12:16
Sorry, you're the one who argued the distinction by erroneously claiming Gay and Straight are psychological, not me. So, you're the one who needs to e...
August 16, 2017 at 12:09
I did no such thing; and the only one pushing conspiracies is you. And since that both strawmanned my argument and personally and erroneously insulted...
August 16, 2017 at 11:48
No, your answer was meaningless and nonsensical, since you can't establish being Gay or Straight doesnt' come from one's body, so either has to be phy...
August 16, 2017 at 11:39
I see that you do get that about the "public alert,' and I missed that. However, your belief the GCHQ alert was the beginning still continues the mist...
August 16, 2017 at 11:36