John Harris

But you didn't agree in this previous statement, since you said a woman who wants groping, but doesn't give consent, is not assaulted if groped. You'r...

And you keep proving I'm right since you fail to even address my correct argument and fall back on sad childish personal attacks. Now you're sexist an...

And the women in your scenario never said yes, so you're moving the goalposts again. You keep showing how wrong you were.

That wasn't the scenario. So, you're moving the goalposts just further shows how wrong you were.

Says the sexist loser...:)

And you just proved you should have addressed this to you...:)

No, the "retarded" one is clearly you. In this vile post of yours, you claim that it is not assault to grope a woman if she actually wanted it, which ...

Your post explains it all. I warned you about digging your hole deeper. You should have listened.

This one may be even worse than the original post.

I already have. Go back and read.

Yes, it's sexist and arguably misogynist. You context didn't help things at all. It was sexist polemic writing, and its hyperbole to emphasize things ...

I know exactly what Augustino was doing Crank, and it was sexist--if not downright misogynist--and vile. To say all the women on TV who protested--and...

It's on page 42 of the Post-Truth thread. Go check it out for yourself. I direct quoted it at the end of that thread.

Here, Baden. Augustino wrote this on page 42 of the Post-Truth thread. It's both sexist and repellent:

This truly is vile.

No, your line of questioning assumes she doesn't know and needs to prove she does to you. She doesnt

[ Apparently not.

And you show you still don't get it. You must really charm those HR people. Oh, that's right; you don't.

I pity your female co-workers if you need that defined for you.

Addressing me with "you also" is a great way of getting me not to do something. Start with "please" next time.

He also said in a thread about Trump that most women would enjoy the particular "treatment" he bragged about giving them during the campaign. It was p...

Looks like somebody's buttons really got pushed...:)

On that we can agree...:)

?John Harris Which button should I press so that you tell me that you won't read any of my future comments in this thread? >: I've already pushed too ...

No, I've clearly made you my toy in our discussions, where you've been left a child well-"spanked"...:)

Because I respond to your trolling? That only makes the children you who aren't here to talk philosophy but immaturely try to get reactions out of peo...

Rofl. The only mad man is you, and your trolling and mad emolji proves it. Keep on causing conflict, though...:)

Actually, it's Buxtebuddha since he just trolled me out of nowhere again. It's what people who can't actually contribute tend to do...poor kid.

One can neither experience the world entirely subjectively or objectively. One can never escape themselves or the world around them.

You already wrote that nonsense and I've already responded: And that still stands true. You have both failed to embrace the dictionary's definitions a...

I made perfect sense, and your memory is terrible. You said "sufficient reason to believe" right below:

That only matters if you embrace the dictionary's definitions of evidence and justified. You havent done so. So, I still stand right on the matter. An...

I am engaging it and you're wrong right from the get-go when you say: "For my money Post Truth (PT) has more to do with the establishment loosing the ...

Sorry, you haven't proven any of that and you're wrong.

Yes I have, you've been reading things wrong.

These things have been happening for thousands of years. Again, this doesn't point to a post-Truth world

None of this points to us being in a Post-Truth world as opposed to other times.

Yes it does, since you can't even do that. Anyone who understands a term can at least define it.

I know. I thought you were Creative.

And yet you can't even define it, which shows you understand it even less. So, we're done on this discussion Creative. I'm getting tired of your provi...

So, you still can't provide definitions for evidence, being justified, and what counts as sufficient reason to believe, as you said people must be abl...

Any interested reader can see Creative has just proven again he has no clue when talking about evidence, being justified, and or warrant. He is practi...

Of course you could if you could define them. You've proven you can't and proven me right. The Irony...:) And it's adorable you write this but you kee...

Yeah...you.

And yet you've continually proven yourself to not having a clue about any of those things. Feel free to define them and prove me wrong. We both know y...

The establishment has always done this. The governments of Queen Elizabeth and Augustus certainly pushed their own versions of the Truth. So, we do no...

Natural entities arent' hypothetical examples, you know that perfectly well and just cant come up with any examples. Thanks for proving I was right. N...

Yes, I did forget my password and explained it to, and cleared it with, Baden, who has erased the Thanatos Sand account. And since I never hid the fac...

The only one nitpicking, and erroneously, is you. If you think I'm wrong, name one natural entity that isn't chemical. We both know you can't. I said ...

It's no assumption and you haven't shown that it is. Again, erroneous smugness is not an argument.