You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

j0e

Comments

For me the dance is a metaphor for language. As thinkers, we're aren't IMV primarily individuals (see Feuerbach quote.) In the same way, a good driver...
April 19, 2021 at 20:18
I think that's a fair theme. To the degree that it's mine to decide, I like open discussions. So talking about what we mean by 'esoteric' is fair game...
April 19, 2021 at 20:09
Do you mean my realizing that the 'I' is primarily a 'we' ? As I see it, quite a few philosophers talk about this. I consider the realization the resu...
April 19, 2021 at 20:05
One last post for the night, which I think addresses the 'relativism' of OC and 'form of life' in general.
April 19, 2021 at 11:10
I don't know Mahler well, but his name makes me think of Bukowksi, who loved to drink and smoke and write to Mahler on the radio. (My Favorite Things ...
April 19, 2021 at 11:01
Ah yes, those elusive glimmers of the numinous...and I agree on the sources. Do you dig A Love Supreme? Solidarity! Yes. Also: 'The worst vice is ad.....
April 19, 2021 at 10:53
I think it's a deep question, because it's about what it means to be rational in a secular sense, but it's something like science being POV-invariant ...
April 19, 2021 at 10:48
Intensities of sublimation! The other (you) is/are a frontier, horizon, Beyond? from/of monotonous subjectivity? Striving toward (and as?) the more-th...
April 19, 2021 at 10:37
:up:
April 19, 2021 at 10:23
There may be an important difference in the 'exalted' sage. It's not just a matter of knowing our shared reality in more detail but seemingly knowing ...
April 19, 2021 at 10:22
I'm glad you emphasized this theme. I think I am trapped in the same way, and we both belong to some humanist scientific 'inner circle.' (I mean that ...
April 19, 2021 at 10:13
I think history is coming up because it's maybe 'really' about politics. Or largely about politics. Personally I want to live in Denmark and not this ...
April 19, 2021 at 09:23
I agree. It's off-topic (if also interesting.)
April 19, 2021 at 09:17
I agree. Humans are complex indeed. Yes, that makes the best sense now that you mention it (again, complex indeed.)
April 19, 2021 at 09:05
I think you are on to something, so I guess I was trying to build a bridge between you and @"Isaac". The Catholic church and Christianity in general l...
April 19, 2021 at 09:04
:up: They'd only be sure to have knowledge of those books, which might have its own value but is not the same thing. One can even imagine that false a...
April 19, 2021 at 08:49
Yes, the social role is especially fascinating. Even the quote mentions the charisma of its exponents. It's tempting to interpret claims of higher kno...
April 19, 2021 at 08:46
:up:
April 19, 2021 at 08:35
I agree that we kept the equality (equal before God the law ...one of these days.) I suggest that science is only the arbiter for some,some admittedly...
April 19, 2021 at 08:34
I don't think Wittgenstein is directly connected, though any charismatic thinker can inspire various 'inner circles' of those who (act is if, understa...
April 19, 2021 at 08:27
I lean that way myself. I suppose a secondary issue is whether 'our' rational/secular philosophy is its own kind of inner circle in a nonpejorative se...
April 19, 2021 at 08:19
I think this articulates the spirit that objects to the esoteric. To be a philosopher (in the newer, critical sense) is (roughly) to share this spirit...
April 19, 2021 at 07:25
Somehow we're all drawn to the same forum, literally and metaphorically, despite serious differences.
April 19, 2021 at 07:18
:up: https://www.gutenberg.org/files/10615/10615-h/10615-h.htm#link2HCH0001 This might be a bit too foundationalist, but the critical spirit is nice.
April 19, 2021 at 07:14
My own approach to this is 'Wittgensteinian.' I don't think 'direct experience' can mean more than a grand feeling here, since meaning is social. I ca...
April 19, 2021 at 07:02
:up:
April 19, 2021 at 05:15
I can understand a theory of the 'pure witness.' We can imagine that when humans (puppies) are born the a new perspective on the shared world is creat...
April 19, 2021 at 05:12
I'd say yes and no. In my view there's always at least a slight risk in dismissing an ambiguous other. Deciding that a poster here or someone at the w...
April 19, 2021 at 05:00
I relate to thinking that so-and-so basically doesn't get it, that so-and-so is following the wrong breadcrumbs, relative to my interpretation anyway....
April 19, 2021 at 04:54
http://fs2.american.edu/dfagel/www/Class%20Readings/Quine/TwoDogmasofEmpiricism.htm This passage came to mind as I was thinking about controversial th...
April 19, 2021 at 03:22
:up: Wow. Tribalism. Not pleasant. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/husserl/ Husserl was taught by mathematical greats, had a PhD in math. Half-natu...
April 19, 2021 at 02:52
What do you make of this? The ghost in the machine is an absurd or an insane posit, yet it looked plausible, because we ignored how much it depended o...
April 19, 2021 at 01:42
I agree, but surely you are also aware of the anti-intellectualism that seizes on this kind of statement. It's too general. Who's unsimple in the bad ...
April 19, 2021 at 01:36
Consider though that you introduced the theme of rushing. Reading lots of thinkers is something one does over a lifetime. Personally I've tended to be...
April 19, 2021 at 01:32
Continuing as before to branch out from W to similar thinkers: https://lenguajeyconocimiento.files.wordpress.com/2014/06/sobre-brandom.pdf These thing...
April 19, 2021 at 00:53
In this post I'll try to link Wittgenstein to other thinkers. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/social-ontology/history.html
April 19, 2021 at 00:17
In: Pronouns  — view comment
I'm not sure, but perhaps that post is a parody? Since 'it' is so objectifying ('it rubs the lotion on its skin'), it's easy to think this is a joke. ...
April 18, 2021 at 23:54
Actually don't know much about that stuff, but it makes sense that his work would be useful.
April 18, 2021 at 23:51
I agree that those questions make little or no difference. Well I'm too much of a snob to read them (more seriously, I can't bear the style) but my wi...
April 18, 2021 at 23:06
:up:
April 18, 2021 at 22:54
:up: :up: :up: :up: :up: :up: I think even the later Witt (in PI) is still swatting down prejudices about language that get in the way of our everyday...
April 18, 2021 at 22:54
The mind-body problem was (seems to me) made possible by a theoretical invention with serious flaws that tends to be taken for granted, rather than as...
April 18, 2021 at 22:49
It seems to me that it's (only a) game if no one uses it to make serious decisions. IMV, politics is deeply intertwined with philosophy (is applied ph...
April 18, 2021 at 22:34
This is the guild thing again. Let's say there's a genuine or pure Buddhism but there's no way to check. You know it directly or not at all. The doctr...
April 18, 2021 at 22:24
:up: Note that you mention guilds. Those make perfect sense to me. That's peer review! That's not the isolated insight that doesn't communicated itsel...
April 18, 2021 at 22:18
:up: The difficult point for me is that some of my favorite philosophers conceptually make a case against dualism. One is led dialectically from crude...
April 18, 2021 at 22:05
:up: Right, and you make a good point. Language is huge, but it doesn't substitute for everything.
April 18, 2021 at 22:04
I sympathize with the value of slow, patient study. But imagine a fanboy of X who's just stuck in the charisma and perspective of a few thinkers. IMV,...
April 18, 2021 at 22:03
I agree, but why/how? I speculate that it's part of the language we're trained into being able to use with others.
April 18, 2021 at 22:01
Indeed. We might ask why we all think that pain-killers can be effective if no one can check in the secret box of the other where pain is supposed to ...
April 18, 2021 at 22:00