You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

j0e

Comments

:up: I think it's still that, even for some professional philosophers, even for atheists. By some perhaps, but even despisers of the 'spiritual' are c...
April 22, 2021 at 05:31
Yes. I guess that's the central problem. Politically, decisions must be made. So we vote. Almost no one gets exactly what they want, but it's better t...
April 22, 2021 at 04:04
To many it was a great accomplishment (perhaps 'the' intellectual accomplishment) to achieve such a view of nature as a system of 'laws' or tendencies...
April 22, 2021 at 03:48
'A rectangular whittling silver lovely little French old knife' does sound weird. Interesting (but unsurprising?) that it's opinion(value) first. Grea...
April 22, 2021 at 03:39
:up: I like this way of looking at the issue.
April 22, 2021 at 03:36
These days reason as is 'animating principle' is likely to look like anthropomorphism. We're back to the idea of nature as an encompassing 'machine' t...
April 22, 2021 at 03:32
I think there's a version of this in Kojeve, since he describes stoicism and skepticism as escapism for the slaves who are afraid to challenge their w...
April 22, 2021 at 03:26
That seems to be part of it, maybe even most of it, but I don't see why making distinctions isn't a skill.
April 22, 2021 at 03:18
That seems highly likely. https://www.newworldencyclopedia.org/entry/Alexandre_Koj%C3%A8ve Kojeve's work 'naturalizes' Christian mysticism in some way...
April 22, 2021 at 03:10
Just consider how zygotes end up composing philosophy. Does a zygote possess the faculty of reason? If so, then why not earthworms? Is it even correct...
April 22, 2021 at 03:02
The 'rules' are just structures in the way we talk. Before we develop a complex tradition of studying the ways we talk (like trying to clarify what 't...
April 22, 2021 at 02:58
:up: I completely agree. I think the only thing that's generally resented or feared about mysticism is its perceived tendency to invade others' 'spiri...
April 22, 2021 at 00:31
I think this is just a good analysis of the everyday notion of meaning. 'It's raining outside.' 'Little drops of water are falling from the sky.' We h...
April 21, 2021 at 23:55
OK, but you've just ignored or neglected my points about language.
April 21, 2021 at 21:34
Excellent reply and I pretty much agree. I do think it's hard though to avoid the unequal valuation of people.
April 21, 2021 at 21:23
I do wonder whether it's exactly ultimate truths that we're seeking or rather a role for ourselves in this mess of a world. Who should I be? How shoul...
April 21, 2021 at 21:21
To 'naturalize' esotericism would be to take it as myths and metaphors. To the degree that cognition is intrinsically metaphorical and that metaphor d...
April 21, 2021 at 21:14
:up:
April 21, 2021 at 21:08
Thanks!
April 21, 2021 at 21:08
Yes. It's very hard to escape this structure. Is it possible to decide what is a gift (valuable knowledge, freely offered) and what is self-praise? Pr...
April 21, 2021 at 10:25
How do you respond to this point? (from the Blue Book thread.)
April 21, 2021 at 10:15
As you know, smart people have held that view. What does 'real in their own right' mean exactly? There's no way to anchor something like 'pure meaning...
April 21, 2021 at 10:11
Earlier in the thread, I suggested that (naturalized) inner circles are actually common. You mention math, a good example, but even in philosophy ther...
April 21, 2021 at 09:53
I'm just suggesting that the concept of the 'totality' (all of the reality) is problematic. I'm not saying that we can't or shouldn't use it but that ...
April 21, 2021 at 09:42
Nice point. This fits in with the idea that esoteric statements are (serious) 'poetry' expressing worldviews and self-concepts. The sage is often unwo...
April 21, 2021 at 08:03
I've bumped into John Wisdom for the first time in an anthology of analytic philosophy. Good stuff! Online texts are sparse, but... https://iep.utm.ed...
April 21, 2021 at 07:56
Consider this (more from Hof): http://worrydream.com/refs/Hofstadter%20%20Analogy%20as%20the%20Core%20of%20Cognition.pdf
April 21, 2021 at 07:23
Right. But, roughly, a proposition and a jazz performance aren't false in the same way. 'True' and 'false' seem to me just as flexible as 'real.' For ...
April 21, 2021 at 07:11
I think concepts/analogies work just as well.
April 21, 2021 at 07:07
To me this leads into social ontology, the manner of being of 'public' entities like meanings. My view on this is predictably Wittgensteinian (and Feu...
April 21, 2021 at 06:58
We might think of a species (form) as compared to organisms of that species (particulars). Roughly we talk in terms categories/concepts. 'A dog tried ...
April 21, 2021 at 06:51
I thought I'd share this passage on Plato's Forms to see what you (and others) make of it. https://home.uchicago.edu/~wwtx/plato.pdf
April 21, 2021 at 05:26
Very relevant text. Isn't authenticity a quiet theme here? How does one distinguish between spontaneous friendship (which is bound to be selective, I ...
April 21, 2021 at 04:18
I think some version of the sage is dear to every philosopher. Not I but Reason thru me. Not I but Science thru me. The sub-sage self is a distortion ...
April 21, 2021 at 03:52
Right, and we might think if Nietzsche, the philosopher-artist , who spoke of 'rank' and the 'pathos of distance.' The great philosopher is a creator,...
April 21, 2021 at 03:20
Agreed. At least with the mechanic you can see if your car starts. I suppose a person could get high on the aura of a guru and their 'car starts' in t...
April 21, 2021 at 03:13
Almost dinner time, but I'm intrigued by this.
April 21, 2021 at 00:15
I don't put all sage-types on the same level. I've checked some of them out. Anyone who gets famous just by talking has some kind of skill and insight...
April 21, 2021 at 00:12
I didn't have any particular theory in mind and I'm not trying to link you to creationism. To what degree are esoteric statements functioning as quasi...
April 21, 2021 at 00:07
That's the clever way to do it! I googled Osho last night out of curiosity and saw the front page of the website. I find it nauseating, such blatant c...
April 20, 2021 at 23:58
To me this seems like a point-at-infinity, an impossible ideal to strive toward. The image reminds me of a god or of God, a serene and benevolent tran...
April 20, 2021 at 23:55
I haven't studied Teilhard, but I'd probably agree with you. I have enjoyed some sophisticated theology at times.
April 20, 2021 at 23:47
I think there's a naturalized esotericism that's defensible (like an inner circle that gets some metaphor as a metaphor, or an inner circle that gets ...
April 20, 2021 at 23:45
Same here.
April 20, 2021 at 23:40
:fire: :flower: :death: (I'm enthusiastically agreeing.)
April 20, 2021 at 23:28
:up: I agree that it mostly fails as a concept. That being the case, maybe a 'total' explanation also fails as a concept?
April 20, 2021 at 23:25
Same here. I've actually ordered the paperback version of Lange's History of Materialism and just last night The Garden of Epicurus by Anatole France....
April 20, 2021 at 23:23
I wish someone had told me that before I chewed up my copy of his essays. :starstruck: :sweat: :grimace: :vomit:
April 20, 2021 at 23:20