You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Human

['Member']Joined: October 21, 2015 at 07:49Last active: October 22, 2015 at 15:151 discussions30 comments

Discussions (1)

Comments

In: What draws people to an online forum anyway?  — view comment
Somebody liked it though.
October 22, 2015 at 15:18
In: What draws people to an online forum anyway?  — view comment
I've known you for some time Tiff, I couldn't remember you saying anything of philosophical interest, but I thought I'd check the records. I wasn't su...
October 22, 2015 at 13:11
In: What draws people to an online forum anyway?  — view comment
I just looked at the discussions you have started at PF over the years Tiff. You might find it interesting to have a look yourself. I couldn't find a ...
October 22, 2015 at 12:53
In: What draws people to an online forum anyway?  — view comment
That is pretty much what I don't come to a philosophy forum for Tiff.
October 22, 2015 at 12:00
In: Do we really have to have "likes"?  — view comment
I strongly agree with the Mayor about the downside of "likes".
October 22, 2015 at 09:12
In: Exactly what do you understand as 'Woo'?  — view comment
Your Grandma's horoscope is commercial, she buys the newspaper to read it. "Woo" is sometimes used to refer to the commercial exploitation of supersti...
October 22, 2015 at 07:46
In: Do we really have to have "likes"?  — view comment
But we don't all agree on that, and people wouldn't stick to the agreement even if we did. And it's difficult to ignore them, as they are stuck in a p...
October 22, 2015 at 07:37
In: Why be moral?  — view comment
You ask us to accept at the outset that a moral obligation can be a fact, but I think that would involve a category error, a moral obligation is not t...
October 21, 2015 at 23:04
In: Exactly what do you understand as 'Woo'?  — view comment
Is "Woo" really a category now? What do I understand by "woo"? It can mean "to court". More recently it has been used to mean something like "supersti...
October 21, 2015 at 22:38
In: Do we really have to have "likes"?  — view comment
From now on I am only going to give "likes" when I really dislike something. So you'll never be sure if you are really liked or not. This subversion w...
October 21, 2015 at 16:15
In: Do we really have to have "likes"?  — view comment
I've given you one Sapentia.
October 21, 2015 at 16:04
In: Do we really have to have "likes"?  — view comment
Only idiots give "likes" so anybody with a lot of "likes" is popular with idiots. It's the same as the American electoral system I think.
October 21, 2015 at 16:04
In: Do we really have to have "likes"?  — view comment
I regard my tiny number of likes as a badge of honour.
October 21, 2015 at 15:58
In: Do we really have to have "likes"?  — view comment
Pathetic.
October 21, 2015 at 15:46
In: Do we really have to have "likes"?  — view comment
I'm less bothered now the "Leaderboard" has gone, that was truly pathetic, still don't like likes, and I don't use a phone for this purpose.
October 21, 2015 at 15:41
In: Do we really have to have "likes"?  — view comment
Nothing to stop you making a quick comment in the thread. Internal replies throw everything out of sequence, people tend to use them to make silly com...
October 21, 2015 at 15:06
In: The Future of the Human Race  — view comment
Hanover, how far into the future does your concern with the fruit of your loins extend?
October 21, 2015 at 14:50
In: Missing features, bugs, questions about how to do stuff  — view comment
No no no, no internal replies, they are terrible, NOOOOOOOOOO! They add nothing but confusion!
October 21, 2015 at 14:08
In: Missing features, bugs, questions about how to do stuff  — view comment
Ok, so you're assuming that this will be a (quite possibly benevolent) dictatorship. But that is only an assumption. I think it is a matter that merit...
October 21, 2015 at 13:30
In: Missing features, bugs, questions about how to do stuff  — view comment
How do you mean "likely" Sapentia?
October 21, 2015 at 13:18
In: Missing features, bugs, questions about how to do stuff  — view comment
Thanks Benkei, I was just about to ask about quoting.
October 21, 2015 at 13:14
In: Missing features, bugs, questions about how to do stuff  — view comment
Two discussions: one philosophical, the other about the rules here.
October 21, 2015 at 13:09
In: Missing features, bugs, questions about how to do stuff  — view comment
It's a moot point whether free speech should have limits. Personally I am in favour of complete freedom in a forum like this, as long as there are no ...
October 21, 2015 at 13:02
In: The Future of the Human Race  — view comment
Great, I voted again. What about you?
October 21, 2015 at 12:49
In: The Future of the Human Race  — view comment
It's not really a Yes/No question is it? I mean I care a bit about how my actions might affect people in the future, but not very much.
October 21, 2015 at 12:43
In: Missing features, bugs, questions about how to do stuff  — view comment
I believe very strongly in free speech. Do you realise Sapentia that you are advocating banning people for not believing in Hell?
October 21, 2015 at 12:36
In: What draws people to an online forum anyway?  — view comment
I guess it is mostly people googling "philosophy forum". And Wosret.
October 21, 2015 at 10:15
In: Do we really have to have "likes"?  — view comment
Will you agree to give me lots of likes then?
October 21, 2015 at 09:33
In: Do we really have to have "likes"?  — view comment
Well done. Is there an option to disable "likes" altogether?
October 21, 2015 at 09:11
In: Missing features, bugs, questions about how to do stuff  — view comment
It would be good to keep all the religious nonsense in one place.
October 21, 2015 at 07:54
⇧