You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Jamal

Comments

It was moved to the Lounge. I gave the reasons here: https://thephilosophyforum.com/discussion/comment/880144
February 13, 2024 at 05:36
You’re the best, prax!
February 12, 2024 at 17:12
Nice. I had a look at the epistemology section of the SEP page for Cudworth and he does seem remarkably Kantian.
February 12, 2024 at 16:27
I'm quite open to the Hegelian criticism/solution, but I just haven't got around to reading him yet. I'm a bit more familiar with Wittgenstein's angle...
February 12, 2024 at 16:09
Thank you Zero, that definitely gives me feelings.
February 12, 2024 at 15:30
See above: https://thephilosophyforum.com/discussion/comment/880144
February 12, 2024 at 15:28
Seems reasonable. A rational being for Kant is one with that active faculty, your number (2), i.e., the understanding, which is the spontaneity of the...
February 12, 2024 at 15:24
:up:
February 12, 2024 at 13:44
Some moderate malarkey is acceptable.
February 12, 2024 at 13:39
@"ssu" Yes, I should point out that I don’t mean to say those threads contain nothing but low quality bickering, rather that, as Baden says, there is ...
February 12, 2024 at 12:12
Yes, non-philosophical discussions were dominating the main page and were the most active. The idea of putting current affairs, science, etc. on the m...
February 12, 2024 at 12:02
The noumenon? It’s a critical concept: philosophers like Leibniz built systems around noumena, and Kant is diagnosing this disease. He also thinks he ...
February 12, 2024 at 09:49
Good, difficult questions. I’m trying to use it as Kant did, to refer to universally valid judgements about the objects of experience. By “universal” ...
February 12, 2024 at 08:58
:up: Is it that it lies in an uncanny valley or a liminal space between the pre-modern and the modern? That it’s strange and familiar at the same time...
February 11, 2024 at 06:26
On second thoughts, I don’t think it is worded very well. At least, it’s not precise enough. It might be asking a general question about perception: d...
February 10, 2024 at 21:08
If you need to contact me privately, use private messages here on the website, not email. Go to my profile and click “send a message”.
February 10, 2024 at 19:14
I suggest you take a break from this particular thread, Mark. Maybe it’s just not for you, you know? More off-topic responses will be deleted.
February 10, 2024 at 19:03
Looks like the person who formulated the question has that background in mind. Whether Owen’s daughter is expected to know that or has any such readin...
February 10, 2024 at 18:59
Still works. For “unperceived” you could think “continued, when we’re not perceiving it”. The question as asked is just very condensed and terse. @"Ow...
February 10, 2024 at 17:42
Unlike others, I don’t see anything wrong with the wording of the question. It’s out of Hume.
February 10, 2024 at 16:54
@"OwenB" You will probably get many answers that are useless or worse, like the one I’ve quoted here. I hope someone will come along and suggest a goo...
February 10, 2024 at 16:42
Great post. I particularly appreciate two things: the analogy of writing, which I’d never thought of before (I’ll probably use that in future); and th...
February 09, 2024 at 16:24
This was the very first response in the discussion and it might still be the best one. It eschews a direct engagement with the OP's argument and inste...
February 09, 2024 at 07:21
I got it straight from this: Here, you imply that we cannot see objects, for the reason that light intervenes between the objects and the visual syste...
February 08, 2024 at 20:54
I'm not going to get into it this time. This is partly because I don't like the debate any more, but also because since you developed your more reason...
February 08, 2024 at 11:54
Yes, I understand. You can be a phenomenalist or indirect realist without making mistakes like “all we see is light”. So yeah, your view is more advan...
February 08, 2024 at 10:05
Thanks, I’d never heard of it. I see it’s on YouTube: https://youtu.be/ZPIysn6JOcU?feature=shared As is the 1971 Soviet adaptation. Curious how they c...
February 08, 2024 at 09:11
Ah, so you’re one of those guys! —I can see rain over there behind that hill —Actually, you can’t —What? —All we see is light! —Oh my God, this shit a...
February 08, 2024 at 06:20
Yes, that’s probably his second most popular book. It was made into a very good TV movie in the 1980s, which I actually like better than the book: htt...
February 08, 2024 at 05:28
Finished. Score: 4.2/5. Susanna Clarke must have been influenced by it when she wrote Piranesi. Next: Thus Were Their Faces by Silvina Ocampo Inverted...
February 08, 2024 at 01:34
I liked it a lot. It has a kind of mainstream aesthetic, but many of the memorable scenes and locations fitted with what I’d imagined (and improved up...
February 08, 2024 at 00:52
Stream of consciousness is cool in modernist fiction but confusing in this context. :wink: Anyway, it’s rhetorical bluster with a hint of bullshit, bu...
February 08, 2024 at 00:16
OK, just one more I promise: /uploads/resized/files/ul/iop7ieg0wiywkilf.jpg Western philosophy and dairy farming.
February 07, 2024 at 08:38
I asked ChatGPT to make an image illustrating indirect realism. /uploads/resized/files/5e/69m7jdx3fjc3ch5r.jpg It's got it about right :grin:
February 07, 2024 at 08:17
You reap what you sow. Since I invited you a couple of months ago you've been arrogant, snarky and insulting to people. And you like to throw around t...
February 07, 2024 at 06:16
Initially you seemed to be asking for someone to correct your interpretation of Kant if you’d got anything wrong, which is the only reason I commented...
February 07, 2024 at 05:20
Mine was something else. I liked the Pevear & Volokhonsky translation of War and Peace so that’s the one I’ll try when I come to reread M&M.
February 06, 2024 at 17:53
:up: Maybe I didn’t get on with the translation, so next time maybe I’ll try another one.
February 06, 2024 at 17:37
Tomorrow I’m going to see the new film adaptation of The Master and Margarita by Bulgakov. This is interesting for a few reasons. The director, Michae...
February 06, 2024 at 17:28
It was really annoying so I abandoned it. The Invention of Morel by Adolfo Bioy Casares.
February 06, 2024 at 03:37
We Who Are About To... by Joanna Russ.
February 05, 2024 at 21:51
Ok, and my last reply was also humorous, but now you’ve broken the spell. You need to stick around here for more training.
February 05, 2024 at 21:03
Wayfarer leaves for a few weeks and suddenly you want to put an end to the human race?
February 05, 2024 at 20:53
If anyone has any ideas about how we’re going to manage without Wayfarer for the rest of the month, feel free to start a new thread.
February 05, 2024 at 19:12
Remind me who you are? I’m so droll. But seriously, you’re a likeable chap so don’t be so hard on yourself. Hey wait a minute. If you were fishing for...
February 05, 2024 at 19:09
Yes.
February 05, 2024 at 18:22
Preliminary to answering Camus in full, we can say that a necessary condition for a life worth living is being free to choose how your own toilet pape...
February 05, 2024 at 17:38
Finding happiness requires a whole bunch of circumstances to align just right, but there are infinitely many ways that it can remain unattained. Or, u...
February 05, 2024 at 08:57
Ah, that’s not so bad then :smile: Yes, I regret doing that, since there was another way I could have hidden it from the internet. By the way, the Sym...
February 05, 2024 at 05:06
I have never claimed anything like that, so I don’t know why you’d be looking for it from me. Of course, I actually do. You’ve said it yourself: you t...
February 05, 2024 at 00:12