You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Jamal

Comments

Fair enough. We shall see.
February 26, 2024 at 12:46
I may get around to replying to you down the line.
February 26, 2024 at 12:45
The proper response is “Oh! I get it now, thanks for clearing that up.”
February 26, 2024 at 12:43
I take @"Luke" to be saying that indirect realists think perception would have to be “untainted by representation” for it to be direct. More generally...
February 26, 2024 at 12:24
Thanks for letting us know.
February 26, 2024 at 07:02
https://youtu.be/8CmcEzRhcEY
February 25, 2024 at 23:03
https://youtu.be/-LEDq7iAGy0
February 25, 2024 at 22:51
https://youtu.be/L33XI7ZnNjQ
February 25, 2024 at 22:32
https://youtu.be/mpkN8nR0EEg
February 25, 2024 at 22:16
https://youtu.be/xfvjRPiGj5g Yeah, I know I’ve posted it at least five times already.
February 25, 2024 at 22:06
https://youtu.be/RaXZc41ldKk
February 25, 2024 at 21:52
https://youtu.be/wNkximLmFXE https://youtu.be/-wYJkiBYN00
February 25, 2024 at 21:11
Excellent, thanks. So maybe @"wonderer1"’s mention of a “connotation of animism” was quite relevant. I’d read that Barfield essay if I could find it.
February 25, 2024 at 07:43
Gerbil.
February 24, 2024 at 13:35
Yes, I’m beginning to think @"Baden" is actually quite a good writer.
February 24, 2024 at 07:24
Scurrilous accusations. It isn’t true of the German philosophers I’ve read. Kant, Schopenhauer, Nietzsche, Marx, Husserl, and Adorno didn’t do it. The...
February 24, 2024 at 07:02
Yes, and the shifting of the river bed of certainties, which points to historical change, as opposed to Kant’s often ahistorical time—time as the form...
February 24, 2024 at 06:47
Nice summary. I was—or @"Banno" was—hung up on the connoted attribution of agency to an object that “presents itself.” It wasn’t clear to me how we go...
February 24, 2024 at 06:33
I deeply regret my failure to make this point myself.
February 23, 2024 at 18:29
:ok: :razz:
February 23, 2024 at 18:28
Good luck!
February 23, 2024 at 16:03
You’re right, I haven’t been paying attention, and now it’s only just hitting me, like a space cock to the head.
February 23, 2024 at 16:02
Great stuff. There is no shame in hitting the wall of paralogisms and antinomies. Or maybe there is.
February 23, 2024 at 13:40
Are you confusing sublimation with Hegel’s sublation? That said, I see from Googling around that there’s been some talk of sublimation as expressing s...
February 23, 2024 at 13:32
I like it for that reason, but I’m struggling to justify it. I think it’s to do with an ecological, relational, reciprocal sort of idea of perception....
February 23, 2024 at 08:28
Since it’s not the lack of evidence that leads me to believe that God is not, maybe I’d need more than evidence to persuade me that He is. What I mean...
February 23, 2024 at 08:12
The Crunch of my Walk Alone I went for a walk some time ago this year. A glance at the outdoor thermometer showed twenty-five degrees below zero. I co...
February 23, 2024 at 07:29
:nerd: :razz: Some space news now. I saw this on the Guardian website this morning: Does anyone else think this is really weird? I’m not talking consp...
February 23, 2024 at 07:04
I changed back to a starling, yes, and a different one from before. I’ll update it to a mynah again next time I’m in central or south Asia.
February 23, 2024 at 05:17
It would be more boring. Incoherent rambling can be a good beginning, philosophically. Haphazardly throw down the clay, set it in motion, then shape i...
February 22, 2024 at 22:19
:up:
February 22, 2024 at 18:31
Very amusing, MU.
February 22, 2024 at 18:21
If your point is that according to Wittgenstein there are multiple forms of life, then of course I agree. My point—which was just an aside—was that in...
February 22, 2024 at 17:51
It's probably worth pursuing it.
February 22, 2024 at 08:46
Yeah. Well sure, everyone from octopuses to planet-encompassing sentient oceans is welcome. I was throwing "human" around carelessly.
February 22, 2024 at 08:36
Cthulhu?
February 22, 2024 at 08:30
Almost a good point, but I think it can be used in a non-passive sense. The back of the house presents itself to you when you go round and look. Your ...
February 21, 2024 at 23:46
Like explaining for the thousandth time that we see cups, not light?
February 21, 2024 at 23:30
I mean, given the right circumstances, I and the hunter gatherer can work out how to live together and talk to each other. Could we do this if there w...
February 21, 2024 at 23:18
I feel like denying that “the only common form of life is the basic biological form”, but I’m not ready to pursue it right now. Anyway, you might be r...
February 21, 2024 at 23:12
I like it. It encapsulates direct realism in a way that acknowledges the points made by these naive indirect realists about the physicality of percept...
February 21, 2024 at 23:07
Thank you for the detailed points. I’m not really interested in promoting the view that Wittgenstein was a linguistic idealist, especially not with re...
February 21, 2024 at 22:49
I agree. I don’t think I implied anything like that, but it’s certainly worth emphasizing. As it happens I’ve been reading the paralogisms recently. B...
February 21, 2024 at 21:53
Hume lov’d those apostrophes. Mayhaps ‘twas an ink-saving measure, e’s using more ink than ’’s.
February 21, 2024 at 20:27
:up:
February 21, 2024 at 18:58
I'd like to read that. Patricia Kitcher is great. I see the abstract mentions McDowell's linking of Kant and late Wittgenstein but I haven't read that...
February 21, 2024 at 18:54
I forgot about this bit. I'm not sure what that would look like. Wittgenstein is sceptical not only of other philosophers, but even of his own philoso...
February 21, 2024 at 18:44
Interesting question. They were both engaged in critical projects directed at exposing the emptiness of philosophy, especially metaphysics, but wherea...
February 21, 2024 at 18:40
«This is a quote too», and “so is this”, and ‘so is this’, and „so is this“.
February 21, 2024 at 13:52
So it's it is offensive for you to see contractions, and by association you find apostrophes themselves offensive too?
February 21, 2024 at 13:39