Jamal

Then you are misusing the platform. I'm suspending you for a week.

Standard preferences to properly orientate the LLM at the beginning of every conversation are good. Like this: So you keep this somewhere easy to find...

No, the idea is to encourage specific good practices in the use of LLMs, assuming they're going to be used. We are not encouraging people to use it if...

I think we should also really emphasize the stuff on confabulation. People seem to be unaware how much LLMs literally just make things up.

This is the thing I have a problem with. I dislike the reduction of philosophy to a set of arguments, with philosophers like puppets being made to fig...

Thanks, this is the kind of discussion we need. I like this. I asked Deepseek to incorporate it into a set of guidelines based on the existing AI disc...

It was probably hogget or mutton so that would explain the toughness. I love shoulder generally, just haven't had it grilled or fried before and took ...

Despite what I said I actually tend to think of the automation of tasks as something you take advantage of after you've learned how to do it manually,...

Oh it was lamb all right. I got the whole front leg and shoulder and butchered it myself without really knowing what I was doing, so maybe that was th...

Introduction: EXISTENTIALISM @"Moliere" I'm not jumping the gun here; I just want to look at something I'm particularly interested in, namely the role...

I thought lamb shoulder was just for slow cooking. I made the mistake of grilling some in the summer and it was very tough.

It can do, but not necessarily. Copernicus said "If AI helps me compose more correctly", so it's Copernicus who is doing the composing. Why believe th...

Nice.

Note that the term translated by Redmond as substantiality is Inhaltlichkeit. This is translated by Thorne and Menda as content. They also say the fol...

I think it's just about possible to argue that the popularity of Marx's philosophy might have been partly based on ressentiment—and that actions by so...

Or it might be more accurate to say that it is based on AI. Apparently it uses a variety of tools, all of them coming under the general AI categories ...

I mean, do you actually think this is all people are doing when they use ChatGPT or Deepseek? I'm sure that many are doing so (students using them to ...

It is AI, yes. Of course! This is the problem with the debates about AI: this idea that an AI tool is necessarily a replacement for thinking. That is ...

I guess you changed your mind about AI eh? I expect we'll see a lot of this. First people moan about AI, then a year later they're using it and have s...

@"Moliere" I'm interested to see what you think of the next section, which seems to be mainly about Sartre. Me, I haven't read any Sartre, so I'm not ...

I'm not convinced we disagree, but as @"frank" says, this kind of talk can get convoluted. It's at least partly a fractal kind of thing: you have this...

Intentional.

You can't.

Diapers are the original cargo pants.

Introduction: SUBSTANTIALITY AND METHOD The idea here goes back to a concern of Adorno's that has come up before: the required unity of form and conte...

And if it's delivered in my trousers, are my trousers cargo pants?

Yes. Substantiality is the domain of social mediation: And the content of that substantiality is social particulars, i.e., "the particular to be analy...

I see what you mean. As MU said...

To take breakfast might be old-fashioned but it is said.

Yeah, that doesn't help.

Sorry Copernicus, I warned you already, and you ignored me. You don't yet know how to properly participate here; maybe this will encourage you to lear...

One month.

Do it again. Do that again too.

That's correct. No particular limit. It's time for you to join other discussions or try to thoughtfully engage with your interlocutors in the discussi...

Here is something I find quite interesting. I have noticed, reading Jospeh Conrad and Vladimir Nabokov, that their English has a non-native feel to it...

Yep. And since Darkneos is refusing to edit the OP, I'm closing this discussion.

This is very childish. You actually chose to ignore these comments: I suggest you carry on discussing your OP, because I won't be posting in this disc...

I'll post in this topic as much as I want. That said, since it became clear yesterday (or whenever it was) that you were, in an arrogant and ridiculou...

My God frank, you are mightily obnoxious today. I am very well aware of the opinions of the moderator in question. But Hanover didn't deny that transw...

Is it any wonder people are flocking to LLMs for good conversation?

It's not outrageous to ask someone on a philosophy forum to back up an eccentric and implausible statement.

So I actually have to ask you to point me to where it was said, or to explain what was said? Because I'm pretty sure you're wrong.

I don't think so.

I don't want to know where it's from. I want you to edit the OP to properly identify the source of the quotation.

At least we now know that the North Georgia mountains exist. :up:

Plenty can be lobbed your way. It's just not worth it. I have my sanity and peace of mind to preserve.

That is a really stupid post.

Obviously if "man" is only about sex, trans men are not men. But this "if" is what is being debated, so you're just begging the question. The debate h...

:cool:

This is useful information. I had it in my mind that it didn't use the spaces, so I started using spaces to distinguish myself. I guess I'll go back t...