You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

What is this error in debating logic called

951Michael February 20, 2019 at 02:44 2500 views 6 comments
I was in a debate with somebody and I made arguments about a certain topic and then at the end I said a sentence and then based upon that one sentence, which really wasn't relevant to what I said before, he said that since I said that one sentence it destroys everything I said. I think this is a red herring but perhaps it is something more specific than that.

Comments (6)

Streetlight February 20, 2019 at 03:01 #257817
Non-sequitur? Red herring works fine too through.
951Michael February 20, 2019 at 03:11 #257821
You're right, I forgot about that one. Definitely does work better. There are so many blunders in debate I lose track. Is there a good list online?

Thanks
creativesoul February 20, 2019 at 03:20 #257822
Google formal debate fallacies. There's many. Opt for an academic sourced list.
TheMadFool February 20, 2019 at 04:22 #257841
Reply to 951Michael Maybe you did destroy your argument by contradicting yourself. Or maybe not
Terrapin Station February 20, 2019 at 22:06 #258000
Quoting 951Michael
and then based upon that one sentence, which really wasn't relevant to what I said before,


Take it out of the argument if it's not relevant.
Artemis February 21, 2019 at 00:34 #258018
I'd really have to know what the argument was and what the sentence was.