Authoritarian rule of the Admins
Contrary to the beliefs on many members of this website, people who value freethinking and discussion, the admins seem to be quite the opposite. Multiple posts of mine have been deleted before I was even notified why, and I am not surprised if there are some which have been deleted without my current knowledge. Due to this website being of a large size, it is only rational to assume it has also happened to others without their knowledge either. I find no real motive for this but to silence people who disagree with them, or have conflicting views.
Comments (26)
The motive is always to ensure quality.
Surely it's a truism that the most active posters have the most posts?
That's the entire post. The reason it was deleted wasn't because the ideas contained within were intolerable somehow, or anything against you personally, it was because as an OP it falls short in a few ways which are set out on the site guidelines thread. Firstly, the thread purported to be about a serious issue, and so is moderated in accord with this guideline:
so it has to meet a higher standard than things in the less philosophical subforums. Also, the remainder of the guidelines are:
We can tick (a), you seem interested. (b), not so much, you did not illustrate any idea clearly or advance any argument unambiguously in your post. (c) seemed fine. (d) also fine.
Try to put yourself in your readers' shoes. Do you understand the following:
We all know that Debord made many parallels when writing his Society for the SI. But there are a few specific parts where corporatism is specifically mentioned.
I doubt it. If you are unsure how to write a good starting post for a thread, I advise checking out a few topics to get a feel for what is minimally expected.
To my mind it's asking to discuss times in the bible where Matthew compared Jesus to Moses and a comparison of the two as mythical figures; and possibly the significance of that analogy for Christianity. But I do agree it is still written unclearly, and the topic @Count Radetzky von Radetz wishes to speak about isn't described very well.
Otherwise, we might as well start conversations about the color of the sky :s
I deleted your most recent attempt Count. Seems I'm the only mod on and active. I'm quoting your OP here so you can work on it some more before broaching the discussion again:
The reason I chose to delete it was because being on the borderline of intelligibility isn't sufficiently intelligible for an opening post.
What’s wrong with that?
It's not a quality conversation, and it doesn't have clear aims, so there is almost no potential for it even to become a quality conversation.
It's okay to start a conversation about the color of the sky if you want to discuss some philosophical issue related to epistemology (for example - I imagine Banno would be someone who would do this), but it's not okay to do so without adequately framing the discussion, such that participants can understand the aim of the conversation and the topic under discussion.
There's no automatic notification system for alerting posters of these changes. That's a software issue. And we don't require such notification of mods, or at least it's discretionary, as it could be considered an unreasonable addition to the workload, and might even discourage moderation, which is the last thing we want.
Anyway, I don't see what opinions you've expressed that we would want to suppress. Part of the problem is that you've barely expressed anything. That's not an issue exclusive to you, and we don't catch all of these, but you've seen the guidelines now, so please make a bit more effort. I'm sure that single short paragraph is not the best you can do.
Says Professor Agustino.
Quoting CuddlyHedgehog
Quoting Agustino
Unless @Banno asks it, in which case it inexplicably reaches 100 pages.
Quoting Agustino
:rofl: I already said that.
That is not a surprise :rofl:
I thought Count Radetzky supported authoritarianism and crushed revolutions. You clearly seem to be leading a revolution this time.
There have been a lot of discussions about how the site is moderated. Personally, I'm generally satisfied. I think things have improved significantly recently. It does seem to me that a quick PM telling someone their discussion has been deleted and maybe why is a reasonable request. The argument that's too much trouble is unconvincing. If two minutes is too much time, then don't delete the post.
On the other hand, as some of the moderators have pointed out on this thread; it is frustrating, annoying, and inconsiderate to start a discussion without putting some effort of your own into the original post.
Agreed.
Lol.
I will use my tyrannical post modern devouring mother archetype powers to suggest that you read them at some point.
Oh, sorry. Carry on then. :D
?