Floyd Mayweather vs Conor McGregor
Floyd Mayweather is the legendary boxer who has a record of 49 wins and no losses. Conor McGregor is the most famous UFC fighter who is the former feather weight champion and is the current light weight champion. Both men will fight in boxing in August, 2017. Who will win???
Comments (41)
It's like putting a champion tennis player up against a champion badminton player in a...tennis match.
Mayweather hasn't fought professionally in almost two years, and hasn't knocked anyone out since 2011. And don't forget - he has a tiny head!
They were saying the same about Pacquiao.
It's all about the gs you deliver to buddy's head, not how hard your hand is. It's about causing their brain to collide with the skull, making them forget often not just the whole fight, but the whole damn day. Get up and keep fighting on instinct while their brains are all scrambled.
The way everyone is expecting Mcgregor to lose makes me want him to win now.
More like putting the best triathlete currently in existence up against a well-aged champion distance runner who hasn't competed in quite some time in a distance race.
Go McGregor!
I'm rooting for whoever is a disappointment or a spontaneous pacifist.
No, he has a normal head. McGregor has an abnormally massive head. In any case a small head is a smaller target, and says nothing about skull thickness or bone density.
Zika wasn't around yet.
Probably a result of maternal drug abuse. But he had a fine childhood.
McGregor, on the other hand seems not to have had a depraved or deprived life. Didn't get screwed by an Irish priest, didn't have a drunken Irish father who beat him. He
He was spoused about 9 years ago and just had a son (well, his spouse actually "had" the child). He speaks Irish fluently, which is surely a plus, and probably speaks English quite well too. Haven't heard him talk. He started a plumbing apprenticeship. Don't know if he finished. I need a plumber. Maybe he'll be free after his match.
I'm betting on McGregor.
Ha, McGregor!
Well you know Mayweather's boxing style is as close to pacifist as a prizefighter can get. His body seems to adjust in real time to the entire space of physically possible near-future configurations of the two bodies in the ring. He is always just slightly impossible to hit. His mind/body system has totally figured out boxing. His whole style is that he can't be hit.
Mayweather's a pacifist! But I don't think I'd say that to his face!!
"A casual stroll through an insane asylum demonstrates that faith doesn't prove anything." - Nietzche
"The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves, and wiser people so full of doubts." - Russell
They even have tested it, and shown that people that think they'll do the best on a test do like the worst, and people that think they'll do the worst do the best. The wisdom traditions are all about checking your ego, which is a defense against your vulnerabilities and mediocrities.
Watching people "read body language" and cold-read out a hundred conclusions per minute is fun and all, but a waste of time when their premises are ridiculously flawed, and with such volume they're bound to be right about something, none of which will ultimately matter, as even what they're right about doesn't mean a damn thing anyway.
With regards to taking tests, exams and the like, I can say this is true based on my experience. I thought I will fail many tests and exams, and I passed them with honors. And there were a few rare exceptions when I felt overconfident, and in one of those cases I even failed.
Quoting Wosret
But I'm not sure about this. Personally, I'm someone who appears outwardly confident (nobody who knows me in real life would say I'm not confident) but I'm very inwardly pessimistic and totally lacking in confidence on the inside. But I fear that if I didn't appear outwardly confident, then my failure rate would be much greater. Appearances do matter - not to me, but to others they do. And I need to influence others, otherwise almost nothing can be done in the world.
Being outwardly confident but inwardly full of doubt gives you the best of both worlds I think. You're not going to underestimate the obstacles, but you'll still get people to believe you.
But there is a sense in which confidence is very important. And it's important in getting you to act - someone who is very confident on the inside, is very quick to act. That can be an advantage. For me, I'm extremely slow to act. Once I act on an idea or thought I'm unrelenting and determined, but starting something new, etc. I'm slow to make my moves. I like to brood over matters over a long time. Despite this, so far I have found that my success rate on what I aim is quite very high, but I presume it is so simply because I take extreme caution compared with many other people I know.
In terms of philosophy sure, but what about, say, in terms of building a family? Are your words and actions in that case not directed towards the well-being of the family instead of to truth?
Only someone that doesn't understand that philosophy is lived, and not simply lipped would say "pfft, maybe in philosophy, but what about your real life?".
Well I think at least that I understand that philosophy is lived, but the practice of living doesn't deal in truth, it deals in actions. Those actions are only guided (but not wholly determined) by truth.
McGregor isn't even a boxer. He's an MMA fighter. And even he's retired.
So this is a spectacle for the masses, who are going to pay ninety-nine bucks each to watch this exhibition. What does this say about the masses? They are not interested in actual excellence, or competition. Only in the spectacle. Then what of philosophy? Would a philosopher say that the very falseness of this event, its lack of fundamental integrity, renders it an object to be scorned and criticized?
Or would they just take the hedonist line and lay down their ninety-nine bucks like the rest of the rubes just to watch the show?
(Y)
http://www.vipbox.live/boxing/485533/8/money-belt-:-floyd-mayweather-vs-conor-mcgregor-12-rounds-super-welterweight-live-stream-online.html
But, McGregor won on points until the last two rounds.
30 million for McGregor. 100 million for Mayweather. They both win. The people who thought it was a real fight lose.
It was a real fight from McGregor, much more than from Mayweather, until round 6 when Mayweather took control of the match from McGregor, by just outlasting him and fighting smart. Most of the commentary, until round 6 was something of the sort: *Mayweather, is a shadow of himself or isn't fighting like he usually does*.
In reality, he just outlasted McGregor.
So, he played with McGregor for a few rounds then when he felt like it, beat the crap out of him. That sounds like business not sport. Anyway, whatever, I'm not a fan.
Fact that McGregor lasted so long, didn't get KO'd and was tied on points for the majority of the fight shows that he's not all talk and show.
Edited: Mixed up something.
Well, either you're irrevocably naive or I'm irrevocably cynical. So, dead end.
Yeah, the bull does most of the fighting though, so gotta praise or commend the bull for being the real fighter.
Mayweather played it smart, and played defensively without barely throwing a punch in the first few rounds, waiting for him to lose energy, and get past the point where Mcgregor could actually throw dangerous shots, and then closed in.
Though I will say that Mayweather claimed that he wouldn't play it defensively, and would come after him from the get go, but didn't.
All the pre-fight psychological games were interesting, where they posture shirtless and get up in each others faces to trash talk etc. I wonder how much of that is actually effective.
Well, yeah, that's kind of an accurate description of it! >:O >:O >:O