If we consider the question in a DNA context, the question is: what came first, the protein-based ribosome, or the proteins constructed by them? The answer is, the protein. Which is the chicken.
We could say non-egg laying chicken evolved into egg-laying chicken and be done with it, ja?
Nee. For the chicken to evolve it needs a next generation to be born. By creating an egg. The egg is an extension of the ribosome that once developed in protein life structures. These resemble the proto chicken. The primordial chicken came first.
Dose assumption come first or does another opinion come first: Like theory or some other fact finding?
Your question was lost in the rush to mediocrity. The answer, of course, is that you cannot have one without the other; an assumption is an opinion, yet an opinion can only stand on that which it assumes. This is not a vicious circularity so much as a holism.
After the opinion is established, if the egg is laid, it is said that the reality the opinion is about has functioned like the chicken that was there first.
The rooster came first, as males often do, which fertilized the egg, which was then laid, which was then sat upon by the hen, which resulted in a hot little chick, who was eventually noticed by another rooster, and the laying cycle began again.
Present awarenessMarch 27, 2022 at 02:50#6740690 likes
The chicken is just an eggs way of making another egg.
The answer, of course, is that you cannot have one without the other; an assumption is an opinion, yet an opinion can only stand on that which it assumes. This is not a vicious circularity so much as a holism.
Neither can come first, hence neither does; the problem can only be an error in conceptualisation.
The answer, of course, is that you cannot have one without the other; an assumption is an opinion, yet an opinion can only stand on that which it assumes. This is not a vicious circularity so much as a holism
Seems the egg, the opinion, comes after that what the opinion is about, the rooster. Without the rooster fertile opinions can exist, laid by mother the hen, but it still needs a rooster to let the opinion touch with the reality it's based on. Which leads to the ultimate question: which came first, the rooster or the sperm? Seems the answer is obvious.
Comments (34)
Yes, egg. Im curious if your reasoning is the same as mine though. Care to share?
But viruses were there long before the fish.
Your posts are for the most part garbage.
That's where the most interesting things are found, my dear@
We could say non-egg laying chicken evolved into egg-laying chicken and be done with it, ja?
Did the fish lay the chicken? There oughta be a law.
Nee. For the chicken to evolve it needs a next generation to be born. By creating an egg. The egg is an extension of the ribosome that once developed in protein life structures. These resemble the proto chicken. The primordial chicken came first.
Your question was lost in the rush to mediocrity. The answer, of course, is that you cannot have one without the other; an assumption is an opinion, yet an opinion can only stand on that which it assumes. This is not a vicious circularity so much as a holism.
:up:
To formulate a theory, assumptions are necessary.
To make assumptions, one needs a context (a theory).
Which came first, assumptions or theories?
Excellent question. I don't have a ready answer OP.
As I said, Quoting Banno
Neither can come first, hence neither does; the problem can only be an error in conceptualisation.
Ok, that means there's a tertium quid (a third, unknown). Do you have a theory as to what that could be?
RUBBISH
It's the chicken that comes first. The proto chickens looked eeagerlyfor new ways. Then they invented the proto egg and the proto rooster. Voila!
I prefer the rooster. sprays life into the egg.
https://www.newscientist.com/question/came-first-chicken-egg/
So was I! A popular subject on the PF! Rooster, when he has had a good life, brings life to the egg.
More seriously, proteins were there before the ribosomes. The first ribosomes were the proto eggs.
@Possibility :point: P-O-T-E-N-T-I-A-L!!!
Can you describe this error to us? I'm all ears.
Bingo!
Which came first? Chicken or egg?
I did, and as so often, you missed it. I'll not do it a third time.
The potential is virtual. The rooster is real.
No, you didn't. Where is it then? Links would help.
:up:
Expand and elaborare...please. :smile: