TonesInDeepFreeze

I don't care to confine my posting based on imperatives uttered by you.

I addressed it amply. So, I take it that you can't adduce premises added to P1 and P2 that entail C.

Well, I thought I was done with P1. What does "informed" mean? A baby has the sensory data of a shiny object. I don't take it that the baby uses reaso...

You claimed that I posted gish gallop. I detailed exactly how you are incorrect about that. Instead, you shifted to claiming that you don't post gish ...

I read it and studied it. It's bunk.

Even more fundamentally, but along the same lines: The Objectivist argument is: 1. Reason is the essential attribute that provides for a human's survi...

You skipped again my response. If you are going to keep doing that, then there is no hope that you'll ever get around to addressing my point. You have...

First, you elide my point. Whether P1 or P2 are true, they do not entail C. You keep skipping my reply to that: So if any mental state is reason, then...

I don't take myself to be obligated to reply to only one of your many claims at a time. You can reply or not to whatever you like. If you would like a...

What are you talking about? You listed P1, P2, and C: I pointed out that it is a conditional statement, not an argument. But then I allowed that you p...

As said another way: You need to answer that better than you barely do . / So you should not have suggested that it is. (1) Reason depends on the biol...

Humans do have physical attributes including feet, legs, endurance running, five senses, teeth, fingernails, fingers, opposable thumbs, et. al. Indeed...

That's not a definition of 'selfish'. It's a conditional statement of the form: If P1 and P2, then C. I take it though that you mean it as an argument...

Obviously, just saying "ZFC" is not a meaningful answer to the questions I asked. https://thephilosophyforum.com/discussion/comment/659140

Obviously, just saying "demographics" is not a basis for claiming:

What is your basis for that claim?

Again, there is no object that is infinity (other than such things as points of infinity on extended numbrer lines). There are sets that have the prop...

I'm not familiar with that. Where can I read about it? I've never seen such a "first axiom of mathematics" as you describe it. Is it something you've ...

Mathematical logic and modal logic are related and interact sometimes. But Godel's argument about God is not mathematical in the sense that the modal ...

Godel uses modal logic and certain modal assumptions. His argument is not "mathematical computation"

Condensed: 1. sime's claim of what Brouwer meant is the OPPOSITE of the basic notion of potential infinity, and sime has shown no source that supports...

Look in virtually any introductory textbook or set of lecture notes on computability. And we don't need a notion of 'potential infinity' to explain th...

So I guess you mean type theory couched in category theory. I don't know enough about that to evaluate your claims about it, but there are some genera...

Simply: Where do you find "eventually finitely bounded" in Brower, or even any secondary source, on potential infinity? Please cite a specific passage...

It would be nice if you addressed my points directly aside from (or at least in addition to) whatever other meandering about various subjects you have...

I've never seen that in type theory or elsewhere. it seems to make no sense. Please say where you have ever seen that as type theory? * There's no men...

That article egregiously misstates Godel. "Godel was famous for proving mathematically that all mathematical systems are incomplete" No, Godel proved ...

We await Metaphysician Undercover's rigorously presented new mathematics that realizes what he considers "the correct way to divide space and time acc...

Again, what is the definition of 'exact'? Pi is an irrational number. That doesn't make it not exact.

With pi you have all the information you need to write its digits for as long as you want to write them. What is the definition of "fully known"? Pi i...

I'll let him know you're available. And cheap - just two bits a digit and two digits max.

The poster has deleted any form of the puzzle from his original post

There are no passages in the article that support your misrepresentations. If you think there are passages that support you, then you can cite them sp...

He said there are no tricks. I don't know whether ambiguity should be taken as a trick.

The puzzle doesn't stipulate that "how many" must be answered with a numeral.

If someone answered it is "1+1" (everything is itself) or "4-2" or "sqrt(4)" then those would all be correct answers. But not correct if the question ...

How is it not misleading to talk at all about URLs now when URLs have nothing to do with it? If URLs were relevant and not merely incidental, then you...

That's exactly what you said.

For potential infinity. Though, in ZFC, we can describe sequences of finite sets. Problematic for some people, not for others. And I am pretty sure th...

Set theory is extensional. A set is determined solely by what are its members (what its extension is). But you are using 'extensional' in the sense of...

Like mathematics generally.

Well that settles it then. Next time Elon needs some calculations to land a craft, he should just call you for your results rounded to two decimal poi...

So you contend that previous answers, though correct, do not suffice because they have variations, while the desired answer has no variations, and tha...

He would be tarred and feathered if he left that out though it's relevant. He wouldn't have.

It can't have anything to do with URLs, because the original post, before it was edited, described the puzzle without mentioning URLs and supposedly s...

It's a good thing that whoever determined the solution to this puzzle is not among the referees of the P v NP contest. Someone would give a correct so...

The third character is 'o' not 'u'.

1

What is not correct here?: noneplussevenn I wrote n oneplusseven n first character = n third character = n different characters = eight = one plus sev...

noneplussevenn I wrote n oneplusseven n first character = n third character = n different characters = eight = one plus seven