You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Dharmi

Comments

He's a crypto-atheist. So is Hegel really. Marx was a true Hegelian. By sophistication, I mean the idea that what we see is roughly what exists. That'...
March 09, 2021 at 18:12
Okay. Many scholars disagree with you. Even people who know German and are translators get confused by Hegel. But, I'll take your word for it.
March 09, 2021 at 18:03
Religion isn't the problem, corruption of religion is the problem. All of the Abrahamic cults are corruptions of goatherders from the bronze age who h...
March 09, 2021 at 18:02
Hegel was an Idealist. He was not a materialist. And I don't have his writings in my library. I have an introduction to Hegel book though.
March 09, 2021 at 17:58
That's how the scientific dictatorship works. When you don't respect the sacredness of the planet, of life, of the universe and you don't respect the ...
March 09, 2021 at 17:56
Ideally, society and the whole world would be ran by natural law. Just as the rest of the Omniverse is. Animals don't need to be told what their natur...
March 09, 2021 at 17:51
No. It's a question of whether those groups are lead by a central principle. What's called the Dao, the Logos, Dharma, natural law. If society all wor...
March 09, 2021 at 17:42
Because materialists are philosophically unsophisticated.
March 09, 2021 at 17:22
I don't say that, science is methodological. It goes on without God, if you're interested in philosophy of science on the other hand, then yes, you ne...
March 09, 2021 at 16:20
Sure you would. Doubting something by itself doesn't lead to nothing, only doubting that's untempered by being realistic about what you can and cannot...
March 09, 2021 at 16:17
Uh, no. Socrates wasn't a sophist. Socrates questioned beliefs, which is correct, but he wasn't a skeptic for skepticism's sake. That's not Socratic, ...
March 09, 2021 at 16:16
Obviously. Everyone has a bias, that's part of the contingency of knowledge. You can't escape your culture, history, etc. when you are making claims o...
March 09, 2021 at 16:14
I know, Buddhism is an incomplete system.
March 09, 2021 at 01:19
Okay, but then making things even more unclear doesn't help anyone solve those problems. This is one thing Wittgenstein is right about. Trying to conj...
March 09, 2021 at 01:13
No, you just clearly say what you mean.
March 09, 2021 at 01:06
It seems like you're just a usual academic obscurantist.
March 09, 2021 at 00:57
Yeah? So? Ideas operate regularly too, they partake of an eternal unchanging Form, of course they would operate regularly.
March 09, 2021 at 00:37
No, science doesn't assume matter exists. Metaphysics is not the domain of science.
March 09, 2021 at 00:26
This book Hindus agree with 3 of 4 of those concepts. Emptiness is the only one we disagree with.
March 09, 2021 at 00:23
Because it's true, they are not-self. There's the false self (ahamkara) and the true self (atman). It is true that the aggregates of sense perception ...
March 09, 2021 at 00:17
Yes, Buddh-ism says that. Buddha only said it's because those things are impermanent, never said what the nature of those things was. He refused to, a...
March 09, 2021 at 00:07
True, but that's not the only thing our philosophy teaches. Four Noble Truths, the yoga system, which the Buddha effectively revived, the impermanence...
March 08, 2021 at 23:58
Have you read this book? I just finished it. https://www.4evangiles.fr/pdf/Wilber/1984%20-%20Quantum%20Questions%20-%20Mystical%20writings%20of%20the%...
March 08, 2021 at 23:56
No, you're 100% right. Buddha's teaching was to focus on the teaching of the Four Noble Truths, he was not willing to talk about atman or anatman beca...
March 08, 2021 at 23:51
Sure. Good for them. I guess.
March 08, 2021 at 23:41
Yes. Because Buddha was an Apophatic thinker. Via Negativa.
March 08, 2021 at 23:40
Scholars disagree, what else is new?
March 08, 2021 at 23:33
Atman is permanent. In the Ananda Sutta, he denies he teaches anatman. Anatman is a later Buddh-ist teaching. Ahamkara, false ego, is impermanent.
March 08, 2021 at 23:30
I cited the article, the article has scholars in it. Of course it's not an illusion. Right, Hinduism teaches impermanence too. Emptyness is a later fo...
March 08, 2021 at 23:23
No, I don't accept the Bible. I don't believe the Buddha was mistaken, because I don't. His teaching on impermanence and the Four Noble Truths is tota...
March 08, 2021 at 22:37
This is just a way of finding an "ever-receding pocket of scientific ignorance." Finding excuses after excuses in order to deny what the actual state ...
March 08, 2021 at 22:27
There's no need to support it's pretty generally accepted that the Buddha was a Hindu philosopher, and that Buddhism was created by King Ashoka, and t...
March 08, 2021 at 22:25
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pre-sectarian_Buddhism#Teachings_of_earliest_Buddhism
March 08, 2021 at 22:23
No, even secular scholarship will admit that the Buddha's original teaching was not emptiness or non-Self. I don't need yoga to figure that out.
March 08, 2021 at 22:18
That's certainly not what we say. Religious authorities, especially in Hinduism, are typically frauds and liars. We go by the Vedic method of knowing ...
March 08, 2021 at 22:13
Yeah, that's right. Because it's only one process of change to the next, there's no enduring self. Just the fleeting aggregates that arise from depend...
March 08, 2021 at 21:59
No, change is the essential feature of Buddhism. In our system too, the gods (except for the Supreme God, Vishnu) are material beings who are under ma...
March 08, 2021 at 21:37
In Parmenides' system, change is merely illusory. In the spectral world, that's how change operates. The spectral world is non-different from God, and...
March 08, 2021 at 21:25
No, it doesn't. Parmenides went over this a long time ago. The Buddha wasn't wrong, certain things attributed to the Buddha are wrong, Buddh-ism is wr...
March 08, 2021 at 21:10
You can act contrary to what you believe, that happens. Assuming I'm understanding what you're saying.
March 08, 2021 at 21:06
No it isn't. There's a false ego and a true ego. Within the material world, all is transcient. But in the world of Forms, the spectral world, Vaikunth...
March 08, 2021 at 19:36
I'm doing whatever means I can. This is also for my own growth, I am doing Socratic dialogue. But I have a Youtube channel coming up, and I'm also wor...
March 08, 2021 at 19:10
That's right. There either is a Self or there is no-Self. But the Buddha himself didn't teach non-Self. It's a Buddh-ist doctrine. The Buddha's teachi...
March 08, 2021 at 19:08
This is, of course, true. As long as we're bound to the prison of materiality, the three modes of material nature, then this will always be the case. ...
March 08, 2021 at 18:30
I'm just here trying to find those very few souls, as God says, who are beloved by him. I'm not interested in most people. I know most people aren't i...
March 08, 2021 at 18:28
Are you really going to argue that a brain stem without a cortex or hemispheres is a brain? You're free to do that, but that's very reaching. You're f...
March 08, 2021 at 18:24
Well, I know there is a Post-Keyensian explanation for it. I think they'd say that if you'd had taxed the money out of the economy, then prices would ...
March 08, 2021 at 18:14
My practice is inclusive. This is a philosophy forum, I'm simply debating. If you accept my view, fine, if you don't fine. I'm not trying to convert a...
March 08, 2021 at 18:11
I can explain this discrepancy, the reason is simple, nihilism is created through ideology. Modernism is an ideology. Modernism was created via Christ...
March 08, 2021 at 18:09
LOL Right, here we go. Materialists reinterpreting scientific evidence to fit their false paradigm. Go ahead and believe what you want to believe. Lor...
March 08, 2021 at 18:03