You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Deleteduserrc

Comments

Or put another way: the nat-geo thing about which breasts are showable, and which celebrity is what race - these are pervasive and organic. All the se...
November 12, 2016 at 03:55
Well, it's certainly liberals who elaborate whiteness in the ways you point out. But I think that same academic bubble you decry may, despite your bes...
November 12, 2016 at 03:46
Doesn't the 'one-drop rule' speak to a more complicated, quasi-metaphysical understanding of whiteness? (Note: I'm definitely not saying that the idea...
November 12, 2016 at 03:12
i agree that pc speech is all too often a class signifier used to identify and keep down poor ppl.
November 10, 2016 at 05:31
Oh, I definitely agree, but I think we differ on why the unspeakable stuff in it is funny.
November 10, 2016 at 05:21
I think that's actually a super complicated question. Couldn't you flip this and say the taboo on racial slurs is an expression of white racial securi...
November 10, 2016 at 05:16
I still don't think that makes the white people the underdog, tho, certainly not enough to explain the humor of the vid.
November 10, 2016 at 05:11
Oh ok, yes, I agree minorities are allowed to attack white people in ways white people aren't allowed to attack minorities.
November 10, 2016 at 05:10
I guess I don't see that as an underdog/overdog thing. It's an ethos thing. And a public/private thing. There are certain taboos in any culture. Both ...
November 10, 2016 at 05:07
I'm not sure what you mean. I think by and large white people are in power, yeah, but there are important social/class things that come into play and ...
November 10, 2016 at 05:03
Like I said, the video is funny bc white ppl already do this exact same thing but code it (like a movie! like a french novel! like jane austen!) but t...
November 10, 2016 at 04:59
Nah, most rich successful white ppl are repressed as fuck. It's a psychological minefield, every day, of what's speakable and what's not.
November 10, 2016 at 04:58
I disagree with this reading. It's funny because it expresses the unspoken and unspeakable emotional undercurrents two powerful white ppl (say a news ...
November 10, 2016 at 04:53
I think it works as best as neither criticism nor sincere expression, but as just a kind of strange crossing of two realms that would never otherwise ...
November 10, 2016 at 04:48
And, as you've already said, alt-righters are all too eager to get serious and sacrifice the humor.
November 10, 2016 at 04:09
It's not bad at all. But it gets infinitely less funny if you view it as a serious attack on PC speech-policing (since it then turns into a sincere lo...
November 10, 2016 at 04:08
I've always thought Trump was funny, and not just in a funny-for-me-as-a-smart-ironic-liberal guy way. But yeah, no crocodile tears, I think you have ...
November 10, 2016 at 03:45
Yeah, this is where I'm at. I love the anarchic comedic spirit (I've mentioned him before but Donald Barthelme is my saint here and is far funnier (an...
November 10, 2016 at 03:34
I respect that type of humor and deeply sympathize with it. It makes me real nostalgic for High School. That's my shit! Those are my ppl! & I also und...
November 10, 2016 at 03:24
no, clickhole is funnier than all that, tho I do agree with you re: Louis CK, Amy Schumer et al. Not all that funny. (I'll be honest, I didn't watch t...
November 10, 2016 at 03:13
I agree with you - funny for me trumps all. But I think clickhole is funnier than most 4chan stuff. The alt-right memes quickly become as predictable ...
November 10, 2016 at 02:57
I agree - even look at OWS. I'd love to never hear a confused reference to Hardt&Negri again. But satisfaction at being smarter - or more aware - than...
November 10, 2016 at 00:40
We're very much in agreement, I think, but I still don't like that Horowitz video, for the same reason I don't like daily show vids about dumb trump s...
November 10, 2016 at 00:08
I do agree humans are animals, I worded the question poorly. Would you say that a turtle remain the same turtle throughout its life?
November 09, 2016 at 20:57
I made no dualist assumptions in my early conversation. If one believes that "identity" does not persist over time (which is a quote verbatim) then th...
November 09, 2016 at 20:48
One last thing re: liberals polling and interviewing minorities (or poor whites.) There's often a slightly bullying aspect to it. The undertone is you...
November 09, 2016 at 20:06
That's fair, I agree with most of that. One quick question before delving in: Do you think animals have personal identity? Or just humans?
November 09, 2016 at 20:00
The people shocked at Trump's Latino support really don't get it either. Have they talked to latinos? Beyond asking them stock questions for 15 minute...
November 09, 2016 at 19:55
Yeah, I'm pretty upset with the results, but I agree with this 100% (There were a few prescient voices among liberals, but they were drowned out by th...
November 09, 2016 at 19:49
Sure, that's fair and I'll admit it was too strong to say based simply on the physical/conceptual opposition that you were in disagreement with the qu...
November 09, 2016 at 19:44
Great, concepts are physical. And they're real too right?
November 09, 2016 at 19:35
Excellent, so after 3 pages, you've arrived at the response Willow was able to formulate immediately. (See above) Can I assume that you think concepts...
November 09, 2016 at 19:32
There's one word that sticks out to me a bit.
November 09, 2016 at 19:28
"Personal identity is the concept you develop about yourself that evolves over the course of your life." Nothing about this quote strikes you as sugge...
November 09, 2016 at 19:28
To be fair, I'm not sure which quote is from where, since you didn't cite your sources, but the first sentence of your first quote is this: "Personal ...
November 09, 2016 at 19:25
Wait, you are referring to definition you quoted, right?
November 09, 2016 at 19:20
You asked me for examples of inconsistency earlier? Here ya go
November 09, 2016 at 19:15
So tho the SEP explicitly defines it in that way - and tho you quoted them to demonstrate the conventional definition - in fact their definition is be...
November 09, 2016 at 19:14
So you cited the SEP as a way to explain how personal identity is defined conventionally, but you disagree with how they define the term?
November 09, 2016 at 19:12
You may have trouble spotting bolded words, a possibility I hadn't considered, so I apologize for trying to to get you to do that. So my point (which ...
November 09, 2016 at 19:06
I know I should give up, but I just can't.
November 09, 2016 at 18:50
? Yes, I am absolutely 100% saying that. Part of reading and talking and thinking is understanding how sentences fit together. (And you wouldn't have ...
November 09, 2016 at 18:38
Do you think that sentence had any relationship to what came before it? What came before that sentence?
November 09, 2016 at 18:27
Bonus hint: Read Willow's response defending you (it didn't go over his head)
November 09, 2016 at 18:24
Re-read it again (hint: look at the bolded words)
November 09, 2016 at 18:22
Man, I guess not. Keep going!
November 09, 2016 at 18:18
You're literally playing out in slow motion my initial post going over your head, so I'm glad to indulge you. Go on...
November 09, 2016 at 18:17
No
November 09, 2016 at 18:16
Yes, the SEP has a relationship to philosophy. Now that we've gotten that out of the way, let's circle back (again) Ok, right, so you think that I was...
November 09, 2016 at 18:15
So, now that we've had a unnecessary exchange of posts because you wanted to also be the one talking about things going over people's heads, even if i...
November 09, 2016 at 18:10