You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Tom Storm

Comments

I think this is right. Is it Norman Rockwell versus Salvador Dali...? too obvious and pat, maybe. I've come to think that rival aesthetical perspectiv...
April 11, 2023 at 20:47
Appreciated. I now remember encountering this some time ago. Given the role an ethical system might have on the suffering of conscious creatures can w...
April 11, 2023 at 20:40
Nicely done. Yes, Nietzsche is like the loyal opposition, a human adversary against which to sharpen their beliefs. But a lot of Christians seem to li...
April 11, 2023 at 20:00
Could be. Rationalisation sounds like a more precise account of it. Indeed. I think that's what I'm saying - the aesthetics of atheism and nihilism is...
April 11, 2023 at 19:48
Feel free to use any Australianism you want, Mate. Enjoy. Occasionally, when I am in the outback, I am struck by the extraordinary star scape. The Aus...
April 11, 2023 at 11:59
You're a guy who loves life and has a sense of the numinous, whilst recognising the tragedies and pitfalls all around us, and you don't even believe i...
April 11, 2023 at 11:33
The point is they don't like sudden, far reaching changes. It's a preference, it's not as simple as right or wrong. I work in an organisation which ha...
April 11, 2023 at 11:29
The 'aesthetic faithful' was referring to the group of people we were talking about in the OP. This was a separate point to where we ended up - talkin...
April 11, 2023 at 11:19
Why did you capitalise because? Anyway... it's a very simple belief. They don't like sudden and big changes that are imposed by others through war, go...
April 11, 2023 at 11:10
I don't think the point I am making about the aesthetic faithful is connected to the loving life people. Many of those confounding folk who love life ...
April 11, 2023 at 11:05
Huh? I have not given my view on this subject, just an account of how some people think. I learned many years ago that some people adore life and cele...
April 11, 2023 at 10:57
I wouldn't think that example works, but you might find a better one that does. Radical change from the past is accommodated and becomes the tradition...
April 11, 2023 at 10:41
Literally, it seems.
April 11, 2023 at 10:33
In: Bannings  — view comment
You got to stop posting pictures of Jordan Peterson, Prax. People will talk.
April 11, 2023 at 10:32
I find the thing in life is to remember that people don't share my experiences, my views or my accounts of reality and why should they? I suspect that...
April 11, 2023 at 10:29
Ha! That would be taking things too literally, even if it did make me laugh. I think conservatives are gradualists and understand that life has been u...
April 11, 2023 at 10:23
Well, they either don't see it or they choose aesthetic relief as per terror management theory. Most people I've met over the years think life is a pr...
April 11, 2023 at 10:14
Thanks. I guess my question is pondering the extent to which people find theism and, for want of a better term, the 'supernatural' attractive because ...
April 11, 2023 at 09:55
Not at all. Now that's interesting, I don't do games at all. But I have no interest in them. I played a few boardgames as a kid and that's it. No card...
April 11, 2023 at 07:09
I hadn't noticed. Digression. Do you think there is a math brain or a type of person to whom math speaks? I ask simply because I can't do any math at ...
April 11, 2023 at 06:26
It's a phase for some and a psychological affliction for others. I had a stage when I was around 10-11 of thinking everything was a simulation - altho...
April 11, 2023 at 01:23
A lot of things can go wrong in the introspection phase it seem to me...
April 11, 2023 at 01:14
:up: I can see that. Interesting. Thanks for the clarification. A useful distinction.
April 11, 2023 at 01:13
Wasn't thinking of you to be honest. But why not?
April 11, 2023 at 00:11
I hear you. It's a wicked problem. Even the notion of consciousness is something I'm pretty sure we couldn't conceive of without language. But I can't...
April 11, 2023 at 00:05
All I know about H is that for a human being to be is to exist temporally in the stretch between birth and death. Being is time. How in essence does H...
April 10, 2023 at 23:39
Seems appropriate. But at some point experience becomes language and visa versa. Experience ends up being understood through language and I struggle t...
April 10, 2023 at 23:20
I will sometimes ask how a person is using a particular term as this is more useful than a 'correct' definition. People who get stuck on specific defi...
April 10, 2023 at 21:17
Thank you. I enjoy these kinds of discussions, perhaps because I'm from outside philosophy. You are an engaging and informed interlocutor. Agree. It i...
April 10, 2023 at 09:47
Ok. That's surely an outlier position, but let's get back to this later. You seem to have argued essentially that you don't like Darwinism because it ...
April 10, 2023 at 08:35
So you are still not providing arguments, you're just trashing Dawkins and now it's his fault that some bookshops put his work in the 'Religion' secti...
April 10, 2023 at 08:03
. As we all know Dawkins is not a philosopher. But none of this answers whether we have evidence that evolution is directed by a designer, however we ...
April 10, 2023 at 07:35
I'm no expert on Dawkins work but whenever I have read or heard him talk about the 'appearance of design' he is generally providing a rebuttal to some...
April 10, 2023 at 07:11
This just sounds like the rhetoric of resentment or an ad hominem based on impugning motives. It by no means provides us with any evidence that evolut...
April 10, 2023 at 07:00
Yes, I've read it and used to own it. I already said it was a polemical title, but you'll note the book is full of descriptions of a highly complex in...
April 10, 2023 at 06:47
Perhaps. I just watched him defend human morality as constrained by innate structural limitations - or something of the sort - against arguments by th...
April 10, 2023 at 06:27
I read him as saying you should not project transcendent meaning/purpose on evolution as the only correct way to understand it.
April 10, 2023 at 05:43
Yes; perhaps it's a distraction from the fact that we are going to die; a terror management system. :smile:
April 10, 2023 at 05:09
Comrade, you helped to remind me of this. :wink:
April 10, 2023 at 02:51
I saw a t-shirt with a likeness of the Buddha on it. Underneath it said, 'Try not to be a cunt: The Buddha.' I think that's about as profound as I can...
April 10, 2023 at 02:08
Not just religious institutions. People who believe in transcendent meaning do it. It's not a point we can overlook if we are willing to put atheists ...
April 10, 2023 at 01:31
Just to clarify - humans rights are a construct and we can see them violated all over the West too. Try being an Aboriginal community member in this c...
April 10, 2023 at 01:23
Well, all that happens regardless of what we believe or what the truth might be, right? North Korea? Parts of Africa? But the consequences of an idea ...
April 10, 2023 at 01:15
Nice. I wonder though why we would need to build a metaphysics on such a transitory experience of surprise. Why pull out this emotional reaction and n...
April 10, 2023 at 01:05
:up:
April 10, 2023 at 00:50
Finding Dennett's account unappealing is an aesthetic response, surely? Personally, I've not discovered a reason to think humans are anything more tha...
April 10, 2023 at 00:48
No doubt you know this one. I'm amused by this becasue I have a dull, literalist mind. :wink: This Be The Verse BY PHILIP LARKIN They fuck you up, you...
April 10, 2023 at 00:40
This I understand. I think we are whatever we fancy ourselves to be. Or nothing in particular (which is my position).
April 10, 2023 at 00:37
What if it is true? I don't hold to this view (or dismiss it) but I don't find it demeaning.
April 10, 2023 at 00:17