You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Tom Storm

Comments

:up:
February 22, 2024 at 02:07
Appreciated. Thanks.
February 22, 2024 at 00:43
Indeed. I'm not arguing this. I'm just saying they are not propositional and are not as clearly beholden to local axioms as a more fully developed lin...
February 21, 2024 at 22:03
This is an intriguing position and I am sympathetic to embodied cognition. I'm not sure what it means to 'exceed' culture. Does he mean that bodily ex...
February 21, 2024 at 22:00
I'm quite partial to incoherence, but it depends on the context. I think between language and silence there are also grunts, growls and purring....
February 21, 2024 at 21:40
I would have thought language depends or is grounded upon the logical axioms: identity, non-contradiction and excluded middle. Without which... incohe...
February 21, 2024 at 20:34
That clarifies things. I don't think this example counts as philosophy - unless you are using the word metaphorically. It's an allegory using irony to...
February 21, 2024 at 19:15
I was thinking similarly. :wink:
February 21, 2024 at 00:25
I'm curious - you don't think reality is one of these - or do you have a presupposition about the nature of reality which informs the others?
February 20, 2024 at 22:44
Is this a serious OP? Would it not be obvious that no one can be familiar with all philosophies, let alone agree with them all? What does it mean to s...
February 20, 2024 at 21:27
I'd expect that. My original quesion was intended to understand how that rather lose category of ideas called postmodernism might understand maths. Ma...
February 20, 2024 at 04:13
Interesting. Although I suspect that like religion this may in practice operate at two levels - there are the literalists who believe the conspiracies...
February 20, 2024 at 01:09
That's interesting. How did they consider poetry was able to do this - by aesthetic distraction and emotionality? Poetry as truth's false gold?
February 19, 2024 at 23:51
:up:
February 19, 2024 at 23:06
That's very elegantly put. Thanks.
February 19, 2024 at 21:50
Please send a hello and best wishes to T Clark for me.
February 19, 2024 at 20:51
In crude terms, the various strands of thinking often loosely described as postmodern seem to be a form of skepticism and a disavowal of metanarrative...
February 19, 2024 at 20:31
I hear you. I find the range of ideas which flow around the categories of post structuralism and post modernism very interesting. The antipathy they f...
February 19, 2024 at 19:50
Yes, I am aware of this - it's generally one of the first things people say when you use the term postmodernism. I chose to keep it broad to see what ...
February 19, 2024 at 19:09
Thanks. I thought Plato saw poetry as immoral, distracting folk from truth. Doesn't he also agree that poetry has a role some later works? How are we ...
February 19, 2024 at 00:42
Nice - can you expand a little?
February 18, 2024 at 21:34
I don't find any of this surprising and I don't think professed worldviews tell us much. I've met many atheists who believe in clairvoyance, astrology...
February 18, 2024 at 20:33
Yes, I'm interested in this too.
February 18, 2024 at 10:23
I did read have a cursory read of Izmirli's piece which you provided. Aside from the historical survey I wasn't quite sure what the piece was saying. ...
February 18, 2024 at 10:20
It's unclear to me what you are attempting to say other that there are different ways of knowing and that you believe in god because of personal exper...
February 17, 2024 at 22:13
Yes, I was familiar with the Sokal affair. More that this, people seem to resent pomo without taking much trouble to understand it. The subject seems ...
February 17, 2024 at 21:56
I was just talking about this to someone at home. Language does us a great disservice when we use terms like 'laws' of logic or 'laws' of nature in as...
February 17, 2024 at 12:21
I’ve come to a similar view. This is beautifully explained.
February 17, 2024 at 01:08
X 2
February 17, 2024 at 01:01
There's no good evidence of this but I think it is safe to say the myth came to us via one or two messianic preachers of the time. There were many doi...
February 17, 2024 at 00:13
Interesting. I once posited here somewhere (perhaps unwisely Kantian) that maybe maths may be part of our cognitive apparatus - like space, perhaps a ...
February 16, 2024 at 08:43
:up:
February 16, 2024 at 05:53
I wish they were more cunt and less post. PS - That was a dumb thing of me to write. I was in a tram packed with very loud Swifties. Big concert tonig...
February 16, 2024 at 05:05
Ha, Nietzsche can be such a cunt.
February 16, 2024 at 04:59
Thanks and Christ! It’s a can of worms…
February 16, 2024 at 04:48
I'm interested in what I might get from member's responses. As I said at the top, time is limited and I have no education in any of this, so I am just...
February 16, 2024 at 04:10
A conversation between both would be interesting (and perhaps incomprehensible). Nice. Ok. I'd like to hear what @"joshs" might say in response to thi...
February 16, 2024 at 03:50
Could be. But no one is claiming PM is entirely original in this. I'm sure, but no one is saying it is. If this is what they do. But I don't think it ...
February 16, 2024 at 03:45
Does your language here suggest that you take post modernism to be a posturing deceit? I'm not aware of a maths specific critique. Just taking as the ...
February 16, 2024 at 01:57
That's the issue right there isn't it. If there are variations in how maths is done, this does not appear to undermine its capacity to produce consist...
February 16, 2024 at 01:25
Do you mean this below? As you say an odd example. I think this is just a strange way of defining the idea of flawless. You may as well say that perfe...
February 15, 2024 at 23:17
:up: This is the matter I'd like to hear more about from someone with more specialized understanding of the subject. It's in the realm of social const...
February 15, 2024 at 22:56
Ditto. Thank you for an interesting conversation. I've appreciated your approach. :up:
February 15, 2024 at 22:14
I am not sure my point leads here but I am sympathetic to this regardless. I am a reluctant anti-foundationalist and consider human knowledge to be co...
February 15, 2024 at 21:02
That I would like to see. Apparently their horns contain magic... But you are quite right to say that a perfect circle and a unicorn have little in co...
February 15, 2024 at 20:25
But I didn't say that a perfect circle is no more real than a unicorn. I said we can't rely upon the mechanism you identified since it can also imagin...
February 15, 2024 at 20:13
Nice. :up: A way of thinking we really need to overcome. Any thoughts on that?
February 15, 2024 at 19:15
Nice. I hear you but i don't think this is all that useful a formulation. We can find any number of minds to agree and visualise a unicorn but it stil...
February 15, 2024 at 08:01
Exactly. Can we demonstrate perfection in any thing? A perfect circle is still an abstraction even if there is no such thing as one in real life. Abst...
February 15, 2024 at 07:23
Fair enough. You are entitled to that reaction. But have I said that objectively perfect things do not occur? I actually don't think this, so if you c...
February 15, 2024 at 06:57