Marx's mature work (i.e. the Contribution, the Grundrisse, and Capital) gives us a different picture of what the "pauperization" of the proletariat wi...
So ... a few things. 1. Marx distinguishes his method from Hegel's in many ways. He is clear, for instance, that for him the method of scientific disc...
Yeah, there are many reasons not to take Davidson's line on this point. For fun: On the one hand, we might follow philosophers like Haim Gaifman and X...
There are definitely interesting things to be said about the relationship between the metaphysical subject/object distinction and the grammatical subj...
This seems right to me. I should have been more cautious with my language! Speaking of "alternative theories of cognition," etc is not the right way t...
I wouldn't be surprised if the answers you're getting here are dissatisfying to you. Here's the closest we'll get to a direct answer to the question. ...
Thanks for tagging me! There are a number of interrelated issues here. I think the problem you indicate is real, but that it doesn't really turn on th...
Sellars, at least, was much influenced by the later Wittgenstein, so he's pretty sensitive to the multifariousness of language. A distinction that mig...
I'm not surprised to hear that Nagel holds some commitments along these lines, but the interesting source is Sellars. Though not widely known outside ...
Even in "an entirely literal sense," this seems wrongheaded to me. It's true that Brassier now recognizes the reality of meaning, but this is meaning ...
Agreed. Sorry about the tone, there. Just meant to communicate to others that Bryant's rather milquetoast remarks weren't representative. Your summary...
Brassier is decidedly not a purveyor of mainstream secularism. To this end, StreetlightX, I think you're off the mark reading Brassier's extinction st...
Comments