You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Thanatos Sand

Comments

Well said. For Hillary, keeping American influence in the world meant voting for the disastrous Iraq war, toppling the Libyan government and pushing a...
August 09, 2017 at 19:13
Critics actually watch/read/listen to acts of creation for their own acts of creation. As Wilde put it, artists look at the world and infuse it into t...
August 09, 2017 at 19:07
I've already don't that many times, and you've failed to address me every time. So, we're done and good night. I won't be reading any more of your ran...
August 09, 2017 at 05:08
Sorry, Cavacava, corporations, governments, and economic systems have been skewing the truth for centuries. So, none of what you mentioned points to o...
August 09, 2017 at 05:07
That was a semi-coherent mess with not one shred of truth to it. You're coming unhinged, Creative. I suggest you call it a night before you embarrass ...
August 09, 2017 at 04:57
I've never debated that. I've just correctly said that isn't evidence of a "Post-Truth" world.
August 09, 2017 at 04:47
LOL. Oh, boy, who ever taught you philosophy sure scammed you...:)
August 09, 2017 at 04:32
Did anyone ever teach you to actually read?
August 09, 2017 at 04:30
Good you recognize that since the only gratuitous assertions have been yours.
August 09, 2017 at 04:28
That's an erroneous summary of Pragmatism and its development and it fails to address its various strains, such as the Pragmatism of William James and...
August 09, 2017 at 04:19
Now, unless you can actually address my arguments, which you haven't done yet, or you start a new argument about Post-Truth, you and I are done. If yo...
August 09, 2017 at 03:55
That was quick, apparently you lied about letting the chips fall where they may. And what is actually happening is you formulated an erroneous definit...
August 09, 2017 at 03:54
Sigh No, you've shown it's easiest to formulate an erroneous definition of a questionable term based on your erroneous reasoning. You've shown nothing...
August 09, 2017 at 03:50
Do you recognize that's not the problem here or the problem with your reasoning? Don't answer that, I already see you're lost on this.
August 09, 2017 at 03:36
Its' not interesting that I should admit that since you asked what "Are you objecting to the rise of pragmatism?" when I never said anything about Pra...
August 09, 2017 at 03:35
I already have in my many arguments on this current thread/discussion,. Can you actually address those arguments for once?
August 09, 2017 at 03:33
No, I've shown that your explanation for our world being a Post-Truth one does not show we live in a Post-world one. So, I've shown your usage is erro...
August 09, 2017 at 03:32
It doesn't exist, and you have failed mightily in your attempts to show it does.
August 09, 2017 at 03:26
This is another huge non-sequitur. It doesn't establish a Post-Truth world at all...just like the rest of your erroneous arguments.
August 09, 2017 at 03:26
What you claim about "all folk" is irrelevant since it would have to be at least "most folk", and it's not in your hypotheses, for it to be a Post-Tru...
August 09, 2017 at 03:24
Of course it does, since if only some/a minority of the people are not using the term "Truth,' it's not a Post-Truth word. So, the only non-sequitur w...
August 09, 2017 at 03:22
As I said before, some folk doesn't mean all folk or even most folk. No Post-Truth.
August 09, 2017 at 03:02
See my last post on that. It's clear now I can't do anything to help you. Goodbye, Creative.
August 09, 2017 at 02:54
And you fail to back up your erroneous concern. Ge back to me when you actually address my arguments. Otherwise, I'll let you flail in your silliness.
August 09, 2017 at 02:45
Try and actually make your point by addressing my arguments. You've been scared to do so so far.
August 09, 2017 at 02:43
No, that's you. Everything I've said applies to what I was reporting on, and you haven't shown otherwise.
August 09, 2017 at 02:43
And you sure proved that, Rook.
August 09, 2017 at 02:38
You clearly are...;) Thanks for showing you couldnt' show my post was a non-sequitur
August 09, 2017 at 02:33
Sorry, not even close to a non-sequitur, and you haven't shown it was. Try Again.
August 09, 2017 at 02:31
Not knowing what exactly "Truth" means does not mean we're in a Post-Truth world. In fact, that means we've never lived in a "Truth" world, so we can'...
August 09, 2017 at 02:30
"Some folk" doesn't even come close to constituting all folk or even most folk. So, no Post-Truth.
August 09, 2017 at 02:27
The Western powers are far from humane. They joined with America to effectively destroy Iraq and kill millions of Iraqis, leaving the nation a disastr...
August 09, 2017 at 00:57
Sure, and that's a great combination of having no financial incentive to try and cower NK--the military's main purpose is to keep banks and corporatio...
August 09, 2017 at 00:50
Exerting military power over or making specific military threats to NK doesn't bring the profits shamefully toppling regimes in countries like Iraq, S...
August 09, 2017 at 00:44
This is a Slate opinion piece by a journalist with a B.A. It doesn't establish anything. And even the author says this: "As president, Trump has pursu...
August 08, 2017 at 22:22
Again you fail to back up your erroneous negative claims about me. So, at this point, you're just trolling. And the format doesnt' do the job perfectl...
August 08, 2017 at 22:16
There is great disagreement about many of these freedoms: Freedom of religion: Many people believe their freedom of religion should allow people to br...
August 08, 2017 at 22:05
Since I only use the boldings when my longer posts require them (or rarely when I'm pointing out an interlocutor's particular post), and you haven's s...
August 08, 2017 at 21:59
If you misuse "conscious" that way, it renders the word useless, since nothing is now not conscious.
August 08, 2017 at 21:08
You seem sure of this. So go ahead and name them.
August 08, 2017 at 19:28
I never said that. Stop straw-manning me. This is what I actually said in response to your post: "Jake Tarragon Nevertheless, the desire for freedom i...
August 08, 2017 at 19:16
No, it's not because people all have their owndefinitions of freedom, and one person's freedom is another person's imprisonment; so, they don't all de...
August 08, 2017 at 18:08
Freedom of choice constitutes far more than freedom from slavery, hence the great variations in people's definitions of the phrase.
August 08, 2017 at 14:34
It's not 'whataboutism;" it's pointing out the preceding president, Obama, did exactly what you called Trump malevolent for. So, since I assumed you d...
August 08, 2017 at 10:42
Sorry, streetlight. I posted before I saw the line
August 08, 2017 at 10:37
Then Obama is certainly malevolent, as well. Since he not only said that, but he actually drone struck and killed a 16 year old son of a terrorist. He...
August 08, 2017 at 10:34
It's hostile personal attacks like this that make it funny Banno (and others) is talking about me. I've certainly never called anyone a dickhead, and ...
August 08, 2017 at 10:32
I appreciate your comments, Erik, but I'd also appreciate if you could show me where I was initially cranky. I'm not saying you're lying, but I'd just...
August 08, 2017 at 10:30
Then you and Noble Dust must feel really (and undeservedly) good about yourselves...:)
August 08, 2017 at 10:02
Dear god, dude. You just made a bunch of personal attacks on me, and you didn't back up a single one. So, you're just sadly trolling with rage and vit...
August 08, 2017 at 10:01