You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Average

Comments

I don't know anything about amplifiers to be honest so your simile isn't something I can understand but I'd like to ask you a question. Would you agre...
February 23, 2022 at 22:45
Do you have anything to say about intelligence? I'd love to hear your perspective.
February 23, 2022 at 01:25
Yes. I think I might’ve found the answer.
February 21, 2022 at 00:19
I guess nobody is interested in this conversation.
February 20, 2022 at 08:09
“The archer ought not to hit the mark only sometimes, he ought to miss only sometimes. That which takes effect by chance is not an art.” -Seneca
February 19, 2022 at 23:23
You make it sound so sinister.
February 19, 2022 at 03:36
I really don't know anything about morality.
February 19, 2022 at 02:39
I can't think of a situation that would be an example of what you are describing. Perhaps I simply lack imagination.
February 19, 2022 at 02:23
I wasn't trying to argue that it was similar to math. I was trying to give you an example of the kinds of things I would constitute as correct and inc...
February 19, 2022 at 02:11
I guess I was preaching to the choir.
February 19, 2022 at 01:52
You don't strike me as rude. Maybe I just haven't worked out my epistemological axioms as thoroughly as I should have before attempting to answer your...
February 19, 2022 at 01:42
I guess for example if you needed to solve an equation in order to pay your bills properly but you miscalculated and were therefore unable to do so or...
February 19, 2022 at 01:35
I'm not sure that I understand your question so I can't provide you with an answer in good conscience.
February 19, 2022 at 01:25
If the beliefs that you base your lifestyle upon are false then I would say that your lifestyle is wrong necessarily. If the beliefs that you base you...
February 19, 2022 at 00:45
I wish you would have made that broader point explicit. That way it would be difficult to miss and It would be easier for me to understand. I hope you...
February 18, 2022 at 22:42
I'm not interested in debating the functionality of drug use so I'll yield to you on this subject
February 18, 2022 at 22:30
I apologize. Your argument is a subtle one but I would appreciate it if you could explain to me how your argument is connected to a definition of inte...
February 18, 2022 at 22:28
It's funny because definitive is definitely related to definition etymologically.
February 18, 2022 at 21:43
What do you think is the best way to generate definitions? Is it even a good idea to develop your own definitions? Should we accept the definitions we...
February 18, 2022 at 20:14
That strikes me as unnecessary.
February 18, 2022 at 18:41
Why do you believe intelligence is connected to the ability to outperform others?
February 18, 2022 at 18:35
Isn't He also the dumbest person?
February 18, 2022 at 18:30
Without peers wouldn't intelligence be impossible according to this argument?
February 18, 2022 at 18:28
Do you mean that intelligence is similar to calling someone short or tall? In other words you're tall if you're taller than most people and you're sho...
February 18, 2022 at 18:23
It shouldn't even be theoretically possible.
February 18, 2022 at 18:19
According to your definition of intelligence he couldn't possibly be intelligent because intelligence is by definition "the ability to apply knowledge...
February 18, 2022 at 18:17
Couldn't someone who was unable to apply knowledge or learn knowledge due to some twist of fate still be intelligent? For example someone who was impr...
February 18, 2022 at 18:08
What do you think "high level" means exactly?
February 18, 2022 at 17:50
Is this what you believe?
February 18, 2022 at 17:45
No it doesn't. I believe that what is good and bad for individuals can be determined objectively. Individuals can be mistaken. If someone believes tha...
February 18, 2022 at 17:19
This is something I disagree with but it doesn't really seem like it's connected to the development of a definition of intelligence so I won't argue w...
February 18, 2022 at 17:12
I'm not interested in morality. I'm interested in intelligence.
February 18, 2022 at 17:07
Do you have a reason why you believe this? If you don't I have no reason to believe your claim.
February 18, 2022 at 15:38
I’m not sure what you’re trying to communicate with this sentence but it strikes me as strange to say the least. Let’s substitute drug abuse with some...
February 18, 2022 at 14:31
This is precisely the point I’m trying to make.
February 18, 2022 at 14:24
If this really is the case then just substitute heroin for alcohol.
February 18, 2022 at 14:23
Your question baffles me but perhaps that’s because I don’t fully understand it and if that’s the case I apologize in advance. Does the mere fact that...
February 18, 2022 at 08:13
I figured. It was a trick question so I deliberately decided not to answer.
February 18, 2022 at 01:34
I agree.
February 18, 2022 at 01:02
What if the result you were aiming for is bad for you?
February 18, 2022 at 00:48
I'm not sure why anyone would use this as some kind of sign of intelligence.
February 18, 2022 at 00:46
He was 34 when she was 17. If she is 23 now then six years have past. I'll let someone else do the math.
February 18, 2022 at 00:39
Do you have some sort of reasoning you could use to support this conclusion or is it simply something we are supposed to accept without evidence? Mayb...
February 18, 2022 at 00:33
lol Idk. I mean I'd like to give you something but I suspect that it would be a waste of time. I think intelligence is probably connected to outcomes ...
February 18, 2022 at 00:25
But what is intelligence? Is it the ability to "figure out how to act in a way that will lead to a good outcome in so far as it is the outcome that is...
February 18, 2022 at 00:11
The correct answer to what? What do you mean by "correct"? What do you mean by "answer"? without some kind of context, even if only hypothetical, I ca...
February 18, 2022 at 00:07
I agree in theory but I'm not sure what you mean given the previous definition you gave of a "good outcome". Maybe you have a revised definition by no...
February 17, 2022 at 23:57
Unless I'm mistaken it would then be impossible for any intelligent person to be unable to "determine the correct answer" because this is by definitio...
February 17, 2022 at 23:42
According to your definition of a "good outcome" there could never be a case of someone intending to produce a bad outcome for themselves because any ...
February 17, 2022 at 23:32