Coercive control on an individual versus individual level would be much more aggressive in nature compared to the sort of control a society would impo...
What if the person in question has no interest in contributing to society? What if that society was seen as evil according to that person's moral code...
If viewed on a practical rather than theoretical level it still means that mass production of animal products would probably be considered unethical b...
Agreed, not a threat, merely a further sign of democracy's decline, its inability to properly evolve with the information age. But even so it is still...
"...need/want meat and other animal products." Quite a crucial difference. Need or want? If you think humans 'need' to eat animal products to live the...
You don't have to drive a car to survive, you don't have to eat animal products to survive. These are choices that facilitate a more comfortable/easie...
The arrest of Assange is just another nail in the coffin of democracy. The only way democracy can function is with a strong and free press. It is a ba...
Yes it is unethical if your ethics include the idea that you should not be cruel to animals. If you believe it is ethical to torture animals as such b...
Destruction is another word for death and pretty much everyone is deathly afraid of death which means destruction = bad. Hey I feel ya, your argument ...
What if your disagreement with the other person is not based on the idea that the other has made a mistake but is a search for an answer? This could b...
What about a more practical look at an argument for antinatalism that could work for you? I don't think such a philosophy would ever be strong enough ...
Comments