You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Daniel Sjöstedt

['Member']Joined: June 27, 2017 at 08:41Last active: August 20, 2017 at 19:073 discussions21 comments

Discussions (3)

Comments

Absence of free will does not equal absence of intentions, so again, I have to disagree.
August 20, 2017 at 18:46
Yes. Why would it be impossible to speak about consciousness if it were an epiphenomena?
August 20, 2017 at 16:07
Seems fair so far, but what then is the role of consciousness? Couldn't all of this be done without conciousness? Or would it be impossible?
August 20, 2017 at 14:39
Is your view that there is something immaterial about consciousness? Or that there is at least something about it that does not follow the classical l...
August 20, 2017 at 13:53
Sorry for any confusion; English is not my first language. The laws I am talking about are the laws that determine the motion of bodies in the univers...
August 20, 2017 at 13:43
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Newton%27s_laws_of_motion
August 20, 2017 at 13:31
I think that the laws of nature have been pretty well defined. And I don't think I'm ready to dispense with them without some sort of alternative. Do ...
August 20, 2017 at 13:14
I think the argument is that the brain recieves information from the outside world, but both the brain and the outside world is deterministic. But, yo...
August 20, 2017 at 12:57
You believe that the choice has a deeper origin? In the will? What, then, controls the "will"?
August 20, 2017 at 12:31
On the contrary, a determined universe seems really terrifying, which is why I am trying to look for a strong counter argument ^^ But how do you addre...
August 20, 2017 at 12:05
Sure, but wouldn't that imply that we have no basis for knowing anything about free choices? A sort of kantian "thing in itself"? And what is the diff...
August 20, 2017 at 11:27
So how do you respond to scientists who have carried out studies where they are able to predict the choices of people, before they have "made the choi...
August 20, 2017 at 09:08
I don't see why free will is necessarily connected to praise / blame. Mostly, the purpose of praise and blame is to negatively/positively reinforce ce...
August 20, 2017 at 08:59
Evolutionary theory does indeed answer the question of why things act as they do. I was not looking for an evolutionary answer per se, I was looking f...
August 18, 2017 at 08:06
Natural selection may not have a purpose but it certainly has reasons. Every human that I know of is able to experience this kind of beauty, so I am w...
August 18, 2017 at 07:04
No, but it is still a "good" feeling :) And that's why I asked about tragedy - I wonder what the reason might be for getting a "good" feeling from som...
August 18, 2017 at 06:12
I actually think I would describe those experiences as pleasing.
August 18, 2017 at 05:59
I completely agree :D But I am trying to understand the origin of a specific behavior, so it makes sense to ask why it developed in the first place.
August 17, 2017 at 20:58
I know, I can't find an evolutionary reason for developing a sense of beauty before tragedy, but logically, shouldn't there be an evolutionary answer ...
August 17, 2017 at 20:46
On the metaphor, then: maybe someone can elaborate on how Nietzsche uses the metaphor of women? :)
June 28, 2017 at 08:24
Ah, well I happen to be a fan of his poetry, so I guess that's why I'm interested in discussing the quote ^^
June 27, 2017 at 13:50