You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Jasmine

['Member']Joined: November 24, 2020 at 03:03Last active: January 03, 2021 at 01:473 discussions7 comments

Discussions (3)

Comments

In: Original position by John Rawls scenario  — view comment
you make some great points. I agree that we can't just wipe all injustices and pretend to live in a happy world where we are all equal and have equal ...
December 09, 2020 at 02:20
In: Original position by John Rawls scenario  — view comment
I am from New Zealand, your close haha
December 09, 2020 at 00:53
In: Original position by John Rawls scenario  — view comment
thank you for this! You just need to be able to explain why you chose the option that you did, in your case option 6. So you don't need to convince th...
December 09, 2020 at 00:32
In: Original position by John Rawls scenario  — view comment
this is the original activity https://crookedtimber.org/2004/03/18/game-on-rawlss-second-principle/ . I am just re-asking it here to try and gauge oth...
December 09, 2020 at 00:17
In: Original position by John Rawls scenario  — view comment
this is nothing to do with psychology. I'm just an ex psychology student who is doing a philosophy course currently and trying to adapt my thought pro...
December 08, 2020 at 23:09
In: Nozicks entitlement theory  — view comment
Thanks everyone. After further thought, I think the first principle is the most important. Because without the initial acquisition, the other two prin...
December 08, 2020 at 01:20
In: Nozicks entitlement theory  — view comment
Sure thing. In regards to distributive justice, the three main principals are 1) justice in acquisition - which is about the initial acquisition of ho...
November 24, 2020 at 03:44
⇧